[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15963493#comment-15963493
]
stack commented on HBASE-17128:
---
Thanks for update [~gbaecher]; let me resolve as solved by pointed to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15963489#comment-15963489
]
Graham Baecher commented on HBASE-17128:
Apologies I never updated here. Performance looked much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15737336#comment-15737336
]
Bryan Beaudreault commented on HBASE-17128:
---
Thank you [~stack]. Much appreciated. We're gonna
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15718324#comment-15718324
]
Bryan Beaudreault commented on HBASE-17128:
---
[~stack] yep, this is on top of cdh5.9. That would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15717532#comment-15717532
]
stack commented on HBASE-17128:
---
[~gbaecher] HBASE-17072 is pretty small change. This is on top of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15713475#comment-15713475
]
Graham Baecher commented on HBASE-17128:
Testing with G1GC enabled and the patches from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15706747#comment-15706747
]
Appy commented on HBASE-17128:
--
Nice, that looks good [~gbaecher], keep us posted.
Btw, here's a copy of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15706682#comment-15706682
]
Graham Baecher commented on HBASE-17128:
I re-ran workload A today against clusters that were
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15706106#comment-15706106
]
Graham Baecher commented on HBASE-17128:
Thanks Appy. Looks like I don't have permission to view
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15704202#comment-15704202
]
stack commented on HBASE-17128:
---
There is also HBASE-17072 [~gbaecher] You able to patch your hbase?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15703777#comment-15703777
]
Appy commented on HBASE-17128:
--
Hi [~gbaecher], thanks for sharing the details.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15703646#comment-15703646
]
Graham Baecher commented on HBASE-17128:
Thanks stack.
We noticed these today:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15703606#comment-15703606
]
stack commented on HBASE-17128:
---
Thanks for the detail. Will help.
> Find Cause of a Write Perf Regression
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15702601#comment-15702601
]
stack commented on HBASE-17128:
---
Our [~appy] has been rereunning compares with workload A and is finding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15680091#comment-15680091
]
stack commented on HBASE-17128:
---
Thanks [~gbaecher]. Hopefully by the time you are back I will have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15678456#comment-15678456
]
Graham Baecher commented on HBASE-17128:
Thanks, stack.
The YCSB workload that's regressed for
16 matches
Mail list logo
