[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16928672#comment-16928672
]
Sakthi commented on HBASE-19320:
I think we should get this one in.
> document the mysterious direct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16924533#comment-16924533
]
Karthik Palanisamy commented on HBASE-19320:
Thanks, [~huaxiang] for the note. Users
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16834885#comment-16834885
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-19320:
-
current patch doesn't include any of the good advice from our
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16834349#comment-16834349
]
Biju Nair commented on HBASE-19320:
---
Looks like there few +1s for the patch. Can this be merged?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16736707#comment-16736707
]
Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-19320:
-
sounds like a great addition to the ref guide, at least for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16736706#comment-16736706
]
wengliemiao commented on HBASE-19320:
-
Thank you [~stack] for the review. For the users whom are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16736119#comment-16736119
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
---
Thank you [~wengliemiao] for the analysis. What you suggest? Turn off use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16735638#comment-16735638
]
wengliemiao commented on HBASE-19320:
-
Our hbase client version is 1.2.3. Recently we run into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16636322#comment-16636322
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
Let me update the doc a bit. With hbase 2.0, it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16560458#comment-16560458
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
I am going to commit the patch, thanks [~stack].
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16364523#comment-16364523
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
---
Is it harmless if it is in place? Can be different issue. +1 on committing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16364473#comment-16364473
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
thanks [~saint@gmail.com] for review. It needs some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16364451#comment-16364451
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
---
It is beautiful [~huaxiang] +1 How about enabling it by default?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16295416#comment-16295416
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
Yeah, I was searching for the max count in NIO and did not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16292061#comment-16292061
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19320:
And 'maxCacheSize ' for NIO is 5 I believe. Forgot any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16292059#comment-16292059
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19320:
I see.. This is per BB size. hmm
bq. So the max
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16291236#comment-16291236
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
-Djdk.nio.maxCachedBufferSize sets the maximum size for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16290672#comment-16290672
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19320:
Patch LGTM.
To clarify- '-Djdk.nio.maxCachedBufferSize'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16290093#comment-16290093
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
[~saint@gmail.com], [~Apache9], [~anoop.hbase], mind
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16279220#comment-16279220
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
The initial result from our testing result looks positive.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16269052#comment-16269052
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
Thanks [~anoop.hbase] for confirm.
Hi [~ashishujjain],
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16268142#comment-16268142
]
Ashish Singhi commented on HBASE-19320:
---
We have faced this issue couple of times in our clusters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16268124#comment-16268124
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19320:
bq. I think Anoop mentioned the read path, how about the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16267824#comment-16267824
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
I went through the off-heap docs briefly. I think the answer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16267189#comment-16267189
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
Sorry for the late response, [~anoop.hbase] and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16263379#comment-16263379
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
---
[~huaxiang] (when you back), how did this manifest in the situation you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16262909#comment-16262909
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19320:
Ya 2.0 only work with DBBs. 1.x by default work with on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16262815#comment-16262815
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
---
[~anoop.hbase] Yeah. This would be hbase2 only, right? What [~huaxiang] is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16262006#comment-16262006
]
Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-19320:
In 2.0 we have direct BB pool to which we read reqs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261955#comment-16261955
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
---
bq, Yes, I thought this was the plan...
Its not default [1]. Filed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261878#comment-16261878
]
Yu Li commented on HBASE-19320:
---
bq. Can we also make the netty rpc server default for 2.0?
Yes, I thought
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261862#comment-16261862
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19320:
---
OK a config to limit the size, better than nothing...
And for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261852#comment-16261852
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
The fix is in jdk8u102 and jdk9, FYI.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261849#comment-16261849
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
That is great to learn [~Apache9]! Netty by default for 2.0?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261796#comment-16261796
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-19320:
---
I observed this problem years ago in java6, so until now the Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261779#comment-16261779
]
huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-19320:
--
Attach two screenshots for this issue.
The first one is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16261769#comment-16261769
]
stack commented on HBASE-19320:
---
@fyi [~anoop.hbase] This is a good one sir.
> document the mysterious
37 matches
Mail list logo