[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-07 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269398#comment-13269398 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- Update the addendum for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-07 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269797#comment-13269797 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- Could some one review this?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-07 Thread Zhihong Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269827#comment-13269827 ] Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5584: --- TestAccessController passes with addendum. +1 on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-07 Thread Zhihong Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269960#comment-13269960 ] Zhihong Yu commented on HBASE-5584: --- It is very late in India. Addendum integrated to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-07 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13270032#comment-13270032 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-5584: --- Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-security #195 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-06 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269135#comment-13269135 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- Committed to trunk. Thanks

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-06 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269149#comment-13269149 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-5584: --- Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #2853 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-06 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269198#comment-13269198 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-5584: --- Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-security #194 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-06 Thread Matteo Bertozzi (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269204#comment-13269204 ] Matteo Bertozzi commented on HBASE-5584: This change breaks the security build,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-06 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13269350#comment-13269350 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- I will prepare an addendum

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-05 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268998#comment-13268998 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-5584: --- +1 Patch looks good Ram.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-04 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268536#comment-13268536 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- Removed the commented

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-04 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268569#comment-13268569 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5584: -- +1 overall. Here are the results of testing the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-03 Thread Andrew Purtell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268022#comment-13268022 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-5584: --- bq. Please consider making a note in the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-05-03 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13268121#comment-13268121 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- @Andy Thanks for your time

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-04-19 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13257668#comment-13257668 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- @Andrew If you have some

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-04-03 Thread stack (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13245392#comment-13245392 ] stack commented on HBASE-5584: -- @Andrew One for you when you have a moment

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-22 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13235622#comment-13235622 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5584: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-21 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234153#comment-13234153 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5584: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-21 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234250#comment-13234250 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- The test cases are passing

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-21 Thread Andrew Purtell (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234806#comment-13234806 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-5584: --- In the patch I don't see where the unit

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-20 Thread Hadoop QA (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233909#comment-13233909 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-5584: -- -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-20 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234075#comment-13234075 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- I am looking into the test

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-20 Thread stack (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234086#comment-13234086 ] stack commented on HBASE-5584: -- Load up the patch and resubmit the patch Ram. See if it

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-20 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234091#comment-13234091 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- @Stack Its better i handle

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-20 Thread stack (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234100#comment-13234100 ] stack commented on HBASE-5584: -- Oh, you know whats wrong? It is indeed broke?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-15 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230157#comment-13230157 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- One more reason for doing

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-15 Thread Mingjie Lai (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230368#comment-13230368 ] Mingjie Lai commented on HBASE-5584: Ramkrishna. One thing you need to take into

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-15 Thread Andrew Purtell (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230385#comment-13230385 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-5584: --- Ram, What Mingjie said. The coprocessor

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-15 Thread ramkrishna.s.vasudevan (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230889#comment-13230889 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-5584: --- @Mingjie/Andrew Thanks for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-15 Thread Anoop Sam John (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230890#comment-13230890 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-5584: --- +1 on additional hooks. Different usecases

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-5584) Coprocessor hooks can be called in the respective handlers

2012-03-15 Thread Andrew Purtell (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13230894#comment-13230894 ] Andrew Purtell commented on HBASE-5584: --- Yes Ram that sounds good. Please consider