[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20652) Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks

2018-05-28 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16493089#comment-16493089 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20652: -- Thanks Ted! > Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20592) Create a tool to verify tables do not have prefix tree encoding

2018-05-28 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16493088#comment-16493088 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20592: -- bq. Why I'd prefer to have this tool in 2.0+ is to reduce the number of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20652) Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks

2018-05-28 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16493083#comment-16493083 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20652: -- Can someone please commit this for me. Thanks :) > Remove internal uses of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20592) Create a tool to verify tables do not have prefix tree encoding

2018-05-26 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16491903#comment-16491903 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20592: -- So in this patch, looks like it's meant to be run against 2.0 jars? But

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20592) Create a tool to verify tables do not have prefix tree encoding

2018-05-26 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16491902#comment-16491902 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20592: -- Oh no, i forgot to look for existing jiras before starting to work on this.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20594) provide utility to compare old and new descriptors

2018-05-26 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16491901#comment-16491901 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20594: -- LGTM. +1 Glad that i searched for jira before starting to work on this

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20652) Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks

2018-05-26 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20652: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20652) Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks

2018-05-26 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20652: - Attachment: HBASE-20652.master.001.patch > Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-20652) Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks

2018-05-26 Thread Appy (JIRA)
Appy created HBASE-20652: Summary: Remove internal uses of some deprecated MasterObserver hooks Key: HBASE-20652 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20652 Project: HBase Issue Type:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-16 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16477912#comment-16477912 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20567: -- Oh damn, my old ssh keys are in hard disk which is at home, so can't setup

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-11 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Attachment: HBASE-20567.master.002.patch > Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-11 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Attachment: (was: HBASE-20567.branch-2.001.patch) > Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-11 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16472874#comment-16472874 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20567: -- Dammit, it was stuck at the password phase of my submit-patch.py script.

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-11 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Attachment: HBASE-20567.branch-2.001.patch > Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-11 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16472760#comment-16472760 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20567: -- Makes sense. Uploaded v2. Added back old methods for backward compatibility.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16471482#comment-16471482 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20567: -- I don't think we can get this into 2.0.1. Does it make sense to backport it

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Attachment: HBASE-20567.master.001.patch > Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Attachment: (was: HBASE-20567.branch-2.001.patch) > Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Attachment: HBASE-20567.branch-2.001.patch > Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Summary: Pass both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace (was:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20567) Give both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20567: - Summary: Give both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace (was:

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-20567) Give both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy reassigned HBASE-20567: Assignee: Appy > Give both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for > table

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-20567) Given both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace

2018-05-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
Appy created HBASE-20567: Summary: Given both old and new descriptors to pre/post hooks of modify operations for table and namespace Key: HBASE-20567 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20567

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17449) Add explicit document on different timeout settings

2018-04-12 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16435975#comment-16435975 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17449: -- please mention the jira number too, so people following discussion here can

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20330) ProcedureExecutor.start() gets stuck in recover lease on store.

2018-04-11 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16434684#comment-16434684 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20330: -- Gave +1 on RB yesterday. > ProcedureExecutor.start() gets stuck in recover

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20243) [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table

2018-04-11 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16434677#comment-16434677 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20243: -- Beautiful. +100 > [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20350) NullPointerException in Scanner during close()

2018-04-10 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16432882#comment-16432882 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20350: -- That's probably because poll() can return null value when PQ heap is empty,

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20350) NullPointerException in Scanner during close()

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20350: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > NullPointerException in Scanner during close() >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20350) NullPointerException in Scanner during close()

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20350: - Attachment: HBASE-20350.master.001.patch > NullPointerException in Scanner during close() >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20350) NullPointerException in Scanner during close()

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16429213#comment-16429213 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20350: -- bq. Can we check the return value from scanner.peek() before calling

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17449) Add explicit document on different timeout settings

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16429173#comment-16429173 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17449: -- Update, i have tests to prove that it works. Still working on fixing few

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20350) NullPointerException in Scanner during close()

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20350: - Summary: NullPointerException in Scanner during close() (was: RegionServer is aborted due to NPE when scanner

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20330) ProcedureExecutor.start() gets stuck in recover lease on store.

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16429131#comment-16429131 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20330: -- RB down for me. [~uagashe] try the suggestion, you'll see what i am saying.

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20350) RegionServer is aborted due to NPE when scanner lease expired on a region

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16429127#comment-16429127 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20350: -- This bug is breakdown of our very basic invariant - scanner.next() doesn't

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20286: - Fix Version/s: 1.5.0 2.1.0 > Improving shell command compaction_state >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20286: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Improving shell command compaction_state >

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy reassigned HBASE-20286: Assignee: Csaba Skrabak > Improving shell command compaction_state >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16429086#comment-16429086 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20286: -- Precisely... :) Thanks [~cskrabak]. +1 Pushing to repo. > Improving shell

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20149) Purge dev javadoc from bin tarball (or make a separate tarball of javadoc)

2018-04-06 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16429045#comment-16429045 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20149: -- What's the possibility - technically, policy-wise if any, user expectation,

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19488) Move to using Apache commons CollectionUtils

2018-04-05 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-19488: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Move to using Apache commons

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426208#comment-16426208 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20286: -- That issue is unrelated, it's about how to handle values returned by

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19488) Move to using Apache commons CollectionUtils

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-19488: - Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 > Move to using Apache commons CollectionUtils >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-19488) Move to using Apache commons CollectionUtils

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-19488: - Summary: Move to using Apache commons CollectionUtils (was: Remove Unused Code from CollectionUtils) > Move to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20243) [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426172#comment-16426172 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20243: -- QA still not happy.  Would have been fine committing it if qa was green,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426113#comment-16426113 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17730: -- Pushed header addition to design doc and changes to upgrade section. Thanks

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy resolved HBASE-17730. -- Resolution: Fixed > [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors > > >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426098#comment-16426098 ] Appy edited comment on HBASE-17730 at 4/4/18 8:04 PM: -- Oh! Thanks [~psomogyi] for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-04 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16426098#comment-16426098 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17730: -- Oh! Thanks [~psomogyi] for pointing it out. Correcting it.   > [DOC]

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20243) [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table

2018-04-03 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16424832#comment-16424832 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20243: -- Patch looks good, few comments. * don't we need shell test too? * use a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-03 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16424764#comment-16424764 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17730: -- Uploaded patch v1 which adds section "3.1.2. Upgrading Coprocessors to 2.0"

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-03 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-17730: - Attachment: HBASE-17730.master.001.patch > [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors >

[jira] [Work started] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-03 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Work on HBASE-17730 started by Appy. > [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors > > >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17730) [DOC] Migration to 2.0 for coprocessors

2018-04-03 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16424710#comment-16424710 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17730: -- Uploaded ascii doc of [Coprocessor design

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20330) ProcedureExecutor.start() gets stuck in recover lease on store.

2018-04-03 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16424703#comment-16424703 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20330: -- we can probably fix this easily by refreshing the list of log files in start

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20330) ProcedureExecutor.start() gets stuck in recover lease on store.

2018-04-03 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20330?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16424695#comment-16424695 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20330: -- Hard to reproduce problem. Our hypothesis was, if a master during startup

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19488) Remove Unused Code from CollectionUtils

2018-04-02 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16422917#comment-16422917 ] Appy commented on HBASE-19488: -- Sorry for late reply, was on long vacation. bq. I don't want to have to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20276) [shell] confirm shell REPL change and document

2018-04-02 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16422815#comment-16422815 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20276: -- Sorry guys for the mess i started. :( Another alternate is - Remove the

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-20304) Flip default "return-values" in shell from false to true

2018-04-02 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy reassigned HBASE-20304: Assignee: (was: Josh Elser) > Flip default "return-values" in shell from false to true >

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-20304) Flip default "return-values" in shell from false to true

2018-04-02 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy reassigned HBASE-20304: Assignee: Josh Elser > Flip default "return-values" in shell from false to true >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20304) Flip default "return-values" in shell from false to true

2018-04-02 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16422800#comment-16422800 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20304: -- Good one. Just saw this, was on week leave. Sorry for mess i started. >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-03-30 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20286: - Component/s: shell > Improving shell command compaction_state > > >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-03-30 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20286: - Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug) > Improving shell command compaction_state >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-03-30 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16420366#comment-16420366 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20286: -- This will change the return value of command function. Not sure if users

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20286) Improving shell command compaction_state

2018-03-30 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20286: - Priority: Minor (was: Major) > Improving shell command compaction_state >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-20243) [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table

2018-03-23 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16411105#comment-16411105 ] Appy edited comment on HBASE-20243 at 3/23/18 9:56 AM: --- bq. I think it would be

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20243) [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table

2018-03-23 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20243: - Priority: Minor (was: Major) > [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20243) [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table

2018-03-23 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20243: - Fix Version/s: 2.1.0 > [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20243) [Shell] Add shell command to create a new table by cloning the existent table

2018-03-23 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20243?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16411105#comment-16411105 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20243: -- bq. I think it would be more convenient if we had a command to clone the

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20249) Investigate behavior of hbase.client.operation.timeout

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20249: - Priority: Critical (was: Major) > Investigate behavior of hbase.client.operation.timeout >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20249) Investigate behavior of hbase.client.operation.timeout

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20249: - Description: hbase.client.operation.timeout should be hard limit on client operations, and independent of

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17449) Add explicit document on different timeout settings

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16409122#comment-16409122 ] Appy edited comment on HBASE-17449 at 3/22/18 7:22 AM: --- So I did some testing to

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20249) Investigate behavior of hbase.client.operation.timeout

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20249: - Fix Version/s: 2.0.0 > Investigate behavior of hbase.client.operation.timeout >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-20249) Investigate behavior of hbase.client.operation.timeout

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
Appy created HBASE-20249: Summary: Investigate behavior of hbase.client.operation.timeout Key: HBASE-20249 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20249 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-17449) Add explicit document on different timeout settings

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy reassigned HBASE-17449: Assignee: Peter Somogyi (was: Yu Li) > Add explicit document on different timeout settings >

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-17449) Add explicit document on different timeout settings

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy resolved HBASE-17449. -- Resolution: Fixed > Add explicit document on different timeout settings >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17449) Add explicit document on different timeout settings

2018-03-22 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16409122#comment-16409122 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17449: -- So I did some testing to verify functionality. It seemed to be working as

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17449) Add explicit document on different timeout settings

2018-03-20 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16406019#comment-16406019 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17449: -- yes. Tried understanding retrying caller. We have a tracker to keep track

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20212) Make all Public classes have InterfaceAudience category

2018-03-18 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403922#comment-16403922 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20212: -- Checked the plugin code (https://github.com/revelc/warbucks-maven-plugin),

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20151) Bug with SingleColumnValueFilter and FamilyFilter

2018-03-17 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403853#comment-16403853 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20151: -- That sounds coherent to kinds of issues i saw with filter last time. Post a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20212) Make all Public classes have InterfaceAudience category

2018-03-17 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16403310#comment-16403310 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20212: -- yeah, can do few modules at a time to chunk up the work. > Make all Public

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-15809) Basic Replication WebUI

2018-03-16 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16402171#comment-16402171 ] Appy edited comment on HBASE-15809 at 3/16/18 4:50 PM: --- Checked UIs. They look

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15809) Basic Replication WebUI

2018-03-16 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16402171#comment-16402171 ] Appy commented on HBASE-15809: -- Checked UIs. They look great and will be very useful for many users. +1 >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-20188) [TESTING] Performance

2018-03-15 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16399970#comment-16399970 ] Appy edited comment on HBASE-20188 at 3/15/18 6:24 AM: --- bq. You going to have

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20188) [TESTING] Performance

2018-03-15 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16399970#comment-16399970 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20188: -- bq. You going to have pretty graphs of GC usage, i/os, CPU too? Can't this

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20185) Fix ACL check for MasterRpcServices#execProcedure

2018-03-15 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20185: - Resolution: Fixed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Fix ACL check for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19770) Add '--return-values' option to Shell to print return values of commands in interactive mode

2018-03-15 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16399959#comment-16399959 ] Appy commented on HBASE-19770: -- wdys? default return-value to true (And rename option to --no-return-value)

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-19770) Add '--return-values' option to Shell to print return values of commands in interactive mode

2018-03-14 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-19770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16399947#comment-16399947 ] Appy commented on HBASE-19770: -- bq. I think flipping the default to true is something we could consider if

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20185) Fix ACL check for MasterRpcServices#execProcedure

2018-03-14 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398610#comment-16398610 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20185: -- Thanks for reviews [~elserj] and [~stack]. Pushed to master, branch-2,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20185) Fix ACL check for MasterRpcServices#execProcedure

2018-03-14 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398583#comment-16398583 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20185: -- bq. Leave a TODO comment around the "pre" CP hooks to mirror Makes

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20188) [TESTING] Performance

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398100#comment-16398100 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20188: -- I was planning to do the same - test with YCSB. How does following plan

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17919) HBase 2.x over hadoop 3.x umbrella

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398096#comment-16398096 ] Appy commented on HBASE-17919: -- sounds right. Let's discuss further on HBASE-20188. > HBase 2.x over hadoop

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20181) Logging and minor logic improvements in BackupLogCleaner

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20181: - Fix Version/s: 3.0.0 > Logging and minor logic improvements in BackupLogCleaner >

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-20181) Logging and minor logic improvements in BackupLogCleaner

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy resolved HBASE-20181. -- Resolution: Fixed > Logging and minor logic improvements in BackupLogCleaner >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20181) Logging and minor logic improvements in BackupLogCleaner

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398091#comment-16398091 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20181: -- [~yuzhih...@gmail.com] reason i committed it was, his style is doing one

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20181) Logging and minor logic improvements in BackupLogCleaner

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Appy updated HBASE-20181: - Summary: Logging and minor logic improvements in BackupLogCleaner (was: Code Review for BackupLogCleaner) >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-20181) Code Review for BackupLogCleaner

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398086#comment-16398086 ] Appy edited comment on HBASE-20181 at 3/14/18 4:27 AM: --- +1 Thanks [~belugabehr] for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20181) Code Review for BackupLogCleaner

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398086#comment-16398086 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20181: -- +1 Thanks [~belugabehr] for nice fixes...keep them coming! Let me commit

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20151) Bug with SingleColumnValueFilter and FamilyFilter

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16398078#comment-16398078 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20151: -- Thanks sir! > Bug with SingleColumnValueFilter and FamilyFilter >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-20151) Bug with SingleColumnValueFilter and FamilyFilter

2018-03-13 Thread Appy (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397079#comment-16397079 ] Appy commented on HBASE-20151: -- Trying to understand the nature of bug morehere's more data.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >