[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15858948#comment-15858948
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17603:
---
And IMO the patch is not acceptable. You should not call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17608:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17608-v1.patch
Fix findbugs and javadoc issues. Add missing annotations to newly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17608:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-17608-v1.patch)
> Add suspend support for RawScanResultConsumer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15859037#comment-15859037
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17603:
---
My concern is, even without HBASE-17508, what if we delete the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17608:
--
Description:
Now for the AsyncResultScanner, we can only close the scanner if we reach the
cache size
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15859064#comment-15859064
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17608:
---
Done sir.
The problem is even if we bring the mvcc read point
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Description:
For now if we set scan.allowPartial(true), the partial result returned will
have the
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17584:
-
Summary: Expose ScanMetrics with ResultScanner rather than Scan
Key: HBASE-17584
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17584
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15849915#comment-15849915
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17584:
---
[~stack] FYI.
When reading the code, I found that an important
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17583:
-
Summary: Add inclusive/exclusive support for startRow and endRow
of scan for sync client
Key: HBASE-17583
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17508-v5.patch
Fix TestMobRestoreSnapshotFromClient.
> Unify the implementation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Task)
Parent: HBASE-17143
> Unify the implementation of small scan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17583:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17583.patch
> Add inclusive/exclusive support for startRow and endRow of scan for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17583:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Add inclusive/exclusive support for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15857220#comment-15857220
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
Any other concerns? Thanks.
> Use mayHaveMoreCellsInRow instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17608:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17608.patch
> Add suspend support for RawScanResultConsumer
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17608:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Add suspend support for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15857751#comment-15857751
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17608:
---
[~stack] PTAL sir. I think this is the last necessary feature for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15857925#comment-15857925
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17583:
---
Too many concurrent issues... I almost forget this one...
I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17603:
--
Summary: Rest api for scan should return 404 when table not exists (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17603:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-17607.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicated by HBASE-17603.
> Rest api for scan should return 404 when table
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17508-branch-1-v1.patch
Fix failing UTs.
> Unify the implementation of small scan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852758#comment-15852758
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17511:
---
LGTM. +1.
> Implement enable/disable table methods
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17508-v7.patch
Fix a bug which is found when prepare the patch for branch-1. When
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17508-branch-1.patch
> Unify the implementation of small scan and regular scan for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17583:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17583-v1.patch
Fix the failing UTs.
> Add inclusive/exclusive support for startRow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853447#comment-15853447
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17596:
---
+1. Let's wait for the pre commit job.
> Implement
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17599:
-
Summary: Also set the partial flag of Result to true if we reach
the batch limit
Key: HBASE-17599
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17599.patch
Let's see the pre commit result.
> Also set the partial flag of Result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853719#comment-15853719
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
So here we need two 'partial' flags? One is to indicate that this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853722#comment-15853722
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
{quote}
Does this issue want to set flag in proto of response
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853547#comment-15853547
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17583:
---
{quote}
Can you fill out the description of the JIRA ?
{quote}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17583:
--
Description: Implement the same feature of HBASE-17320 for sync client.
> Add inclusive/exclusive
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853743#comment-15853743
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
May introduce a new flag? Maybe 'hasLastCell'? The word 'partial'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853780#comment-15853780
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
What about 'mayHaveMoreCellsInRow'?
> Also set the partial flag
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17407:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Component/s: wal
> Correct update of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17407:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833840#comment-15833840
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
{quote}
I think we need only synchronize the acquirement of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17471:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17471-duo.patch
Try a pre commit check. Remove pre assign related code.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17471:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17471-duo-v1.patch
Fix TestWALActionsListener.
> Region Seqid will be out of order
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833788#comment-15833788
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17407:
---
Will commit shortly.
> Correct update of maxFlushedSeqId in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833816#comment-15833816
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
I still do not think we need a configurable preAssign...
We can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17471:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17471-duo-v2.patch
Fix failed UTs except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834181#comment-15834181
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
[~allan163] I've already modified the UTs to always construct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834187#comment-15834187
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17367:
---
+1.
> Make HTable#getBufferedMutator thread safe
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834030#comment-15834030
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
Most UTs are failed because of NPE which is caused by lack of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834047#comment-15834047
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
{quote}
The main different is that, I think we don't have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17489:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-17489-v5.patch)
> ClientScanner may send a next request to a RegionScanner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15832973#comment-15832973
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17497:
---
Mind explaining why returns a CompletableFuture instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15832976#comment-15832976
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17489:
---
{quote}
The patch makes valiant effort and trying to clean up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17489:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17489-v5.patch
> ClientScanner may send a next request to a RegionScanner which has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17489:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17489-v5.patch
Address comments on rb.
> ClientScanner may send a next request to a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15834205#comment-15834205
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
{quote}
some unit tests haven't complete them after append
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837004#comment-15837004
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17045:
---
OK. Let me commit this and open a new issue to discuss the pread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837375#comment-15837375
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17346:
---
Oh I missed the comment...
{quote}
Is the above order of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837409#comment-15837409
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17346:
---
Seems we haven't run the new UTs added in hbase-endpoint module?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837226#comment-15837226
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
I think the problem is the parameter name 'inMemstore'. If the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837237#comment-15837237
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17471:
---
{quote}
If not 'inMemstore', mvcc is just used for seqid assign,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17346:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17346-v2.patch
Implement AsyncAggregationClient.
> Add coprocessor service support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15839678#comment-15839678
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17545:
---
[~stack]. FYI.
> 'mvn test' does not run all the tests in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17545:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17545.patch
> 'mvn test' does not run all the tests in hbase-endpoint
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17545:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> 'mvn test' does not run all the tests in hbase-endpoint
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15839650#comment-15839650
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17346:
---
{quote}
Is it a ClientCoprocessorRpcController ? There is nothing
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17545:
-
Summary: 'mvn test' does not run all the tests in hbase-endpoint
Key: HBASE-17545
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17545
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15843937#comment-15843937
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17346:
---
{quote}
Do s/done/callback/g I'd say. 'done' I don't get when I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17346:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17346-v3.patch
Add javadoc for newly added mehods and classes.
> Add coprocessor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15843908#comment-15843908
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17346:
---
The failed UT also fails on master.
> Add coprocessor service
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15843808#comment-15843808
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17346:
---
[~stack] I've add (a lot of) comments for the new methods and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837753#comment-15837753
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17346:
---
We have this in hbase-endpoint/pom.xml
{code}
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17505:
-
Summary: Do not issue close scanner request if RS tells us there
is no more results for this region
Key: HBASE-17505
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17505
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833227#comment-15833227
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17497:
---
I think we can just return a RawAsyncTable here.
And as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17489:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17489-v6.patch
Fix TestClientScanner.
> ClientScanner may send a next request to a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833232#comment-15833232
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17489:
---
Filed HBASE-17505 for the follow on work. Will commit later if no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-17497.
---
Resolution: Fixed
The problem can be addressed in follow on issues.
> Add first async
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17489:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17489-branch-1.patch
Patch for branch-1.
> ClientScanner may send a next request to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833361#comment-15833361
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17489:
---
The 'new' javac issue is exactly the 'fixed' one...
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833363#comment-15833363
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17489:
---
And for branch-1.3, {{TestMetaWithReplicas}} fails without the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17489:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17489-branch-1.3.patch
Patch for 1.3.
> ClientScanner may send a next request to a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17045:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-17405-v6.patch)
> Unify the implementation of small scan and regular scan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833421#comment-15833421
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17507:
---
Consider WAL, what if the order of mvcc differs from the order of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833438#comment-15833438
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17507:
---
{quote}
The preAssignMvccLock is per-region level while w/o mvcc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17489:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17045:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17405-v6.patch
Rebase after HBASE-17489.
> Unify the implementation of small scan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17045:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17405-v6.patch
With HBASE-17489 we do not need to modify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833403#comment-15833403
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17507:
---
Can we always do preassign? I do not think the document can help
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15833454#comment-15833454
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17507:
---
And I think we already have a lock in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17045:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17045-v7.patch
Add annotation for Scan.ReadType.
> Unify the implementation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17407:
--
Assignee: Eshcar Hillel
> Correct update of maxFlushedSeqId in HRegion
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15842727#comment-15842727
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17552:
---
{quote}
Include the Jira issue id in the commit message, along
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15840708#comment-15840708
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16785:
---
At least It works for hbase-endpoint. Without the removal we only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15836840#comment-15836840
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17045:
---
Any other concerns sir [~stack]?
Thanks.
> Unify the
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17528:
-
Summary: Remove the Scan.ReadType flag introduced in HBASE-17045
Key: HBASE-17528
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17528
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17045:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15837029#comment-15837029
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17045:
---
Filed HBASE-17528 for the follow-on work.
> Unify the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875745#comment-15875745
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16990:
---
I think a better way is to retain the ACLs along with snapshot,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875916#comment-15875916
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16990:
---
Sounds reasonable.
Is it possible to add a test for it?
Thanks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17069:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17069:
--
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
> RegionServer writes invalid META entries for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15869323#comment-15869323
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17069:
---
Will commit shortly if no objections.
> RegionServer writes
1001 - 1100 of 18521 matches
Mail list logo
