[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411314#comment-15411314
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
[~ashish singhi] Any other concerns?
Thanks,
> Push entries to peer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-12770:
--
Affects Version/s: 1.4.0
2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-12770:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16285:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16285-v7.patch
Retry and ping [~stack].
> Drop RPC requests if it must be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-9465:
-
Attachment: HBASE-9465-v6.patch
Retry.
> Push entries to peer clusters serially
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411516#comment-15411516
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
[~yangzhe1991] Can you please upload a rebased patch? Thanks.
> Push
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411369#comment-15411369
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
Good. Thanks for reviewing.
Will commit shortly.
> Push entries to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411466#comment-15411466
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-12770:
---
The failed UT is unrelated. Will commit shortly.
Thanks.
> Don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15411796#comment-15411796
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
Is TestReplicationSourceManager related？
> Push entries to peer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15402986#comment-15402986
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16209:
---
It is forceNewPlan, which means we must generate a new plan even
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16323:
-
Summary: Introduce a new type of filter for compaction scan
Key: HBASE-16323
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16323
Project: HBase
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9465?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15403507#comment-15403507
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-9465:
--
Also +1 on v3.
[~stack] [~lhofhansl] [~enis] Any concerns?
Thanks.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16320:
-
Summary: Revisit scan semantics and implementations
Key: HBASE-16320
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16320
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Umbrella
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16322:
-
Summary: Dsiable filter for raw scan
Key: HBASE-16322
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16322
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Affects Version/s: 1.4.0
2.0.0
Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16324:
-
Summary: Remove LegacyScanQueryMatcher
Key: HBASE-16324
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16324
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15403183#comment-15403183
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16209:
---
Why do you want to call invokeAssignLaterOnFailure in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15403184#comment-15403184
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16196:
---
Can we try printing out which dependency misses a license?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15403214#comment-15403214
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16196:
---
Good.
> Update jruby to a newer version.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15403193#comment-15403193
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16209:
---
And in my experience， there is no NPE. The problem is that the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch)
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16225:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16225-branch-1-v1.patch
Retry.
> Refactor ScanQueryMatcher
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15358668#comment-15358668
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
The failed tests are unrelated. Any other concerns? Thanks.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15358260#comment-15358260
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
oldsources is a {{CopyOnWriteArrayList}}, its iterator does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15358416#comment-15358416
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
I can not reproduce it locally. The strange log output is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15358344#comment-15358344
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
You can file another issue to do refactoring.
> PeerClusterZnode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15358391#comment-15358391
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
Let me check the failed UT.
> PeerClusterZnode under rs of
Duo Zhang created HBASE-16165:
-
Summary: Decrease RpcServer.callQueueSize before writeResponse
causes OOM
Key: HBASE-16165
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16165
Project: HBase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15358726#comment-15358726
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16165:
---
One possible way to fix this is to decrease call queue size after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16135-v3.patch
Haven't found the root cause yet, but peer id '2' is only introduced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16135-branch-1.1.patch
> PeerClusterZnode under rs of removed peer may never be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16135-0.98.patch
> PeerClusterZnode under rs of removed peer may never be deleted
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16135-branch-1.2.patch
> PeerClusterZnode under rs of removed peer may never be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15356292#comment-15356292
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15454:
---
I haven't tested this in a real cluster yet...
And one thing I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Affects Version/s: 1.2.2
1.4.0
1.3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15356506#comment-15356506
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
Ping [~ashu210890] and [~ghelmling], let's commit if you guys do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15356594#comment-15356594
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16110:
---
Ping [~busbey]
> AsyncFS WAL doesn't work with Hadoop 2.8+
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16165:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Decrease RpcServer.callQueueSize before writeResponse causes OOM
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359877#comment-15359877
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16165:
---
We hit this recently, but only happens on our legacy 94 clusters.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15360740#comment-15360740
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16135:
---
Will commit this evening(GMT+8) if no objections.
Thanks.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Attachment: (was: HBASE-16135-branch-1.patch)
> PeerClusterZnode under rs of removed peer may
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16135-branch-1.patch
Patch for branch-1.
> PeerClusterZnode under rs of removed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-16135:
--
Attachment: HBASE-16135-branch-1.patch
Missed one @Test annotation...
> PeerClusterZnode under rs of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15423827#comment-15423827
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15921:
---
OK, you use it in this patch...
I left a comment on rb, I do not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15423786#comment-15423786
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-15798:
---
Sorry a bit late, but how do you use the {{AsyncRpcChannel}} in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15425911#comment-15425911
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-16388:
---
How do you deal with the async call? Although it is not used right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15849784#comment-15849784
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
{quote}
How hard to do this?
{quote}
I haven't read the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15851169#comment-15851169
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17552:
---
Sorry for being late. +1. Nice work [~appy].
> Update developer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17508-v6.patch
Address the comments on rb.
> Unify the implementation of small scan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15851163#comment-15851163
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
Any other concerns sir? [~stack]
If no big concern, let me start
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852520#comment-15852520
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
Filed HBASE-17595 to track it. [~stack].
Let me prepare patch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852515#comment-15852515
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
{quote}
Only concern is the follow-on JIRA that will ensure we
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17595:
-
Summary: Add partial result for small/limited scan
Key: HBASE-17595
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17595
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15848372#comment-15848372
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
Fix TestSyncTable. The problem is in the syncRange method, we use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17508-v3.patch
> Unify the implementation of small scan and regular scan for sync
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17508-v4.patch
Some minor cleanups.
> Unify the implementation of small scan and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17599-v1.patch
Will open a new issue to clean up the usage of isPartial.
> Use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17402:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17402.patch
The fix is simple.. I forgot to record toSend in pendingRequest in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17402:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
Status: Patch Available (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Also set the partial flag of Result
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Summary: Use mayHaveMoreCellsInRow instead of isPartial (was: Also set the
partial flag of Result to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855111#comment-15855111
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
Any concerns on the new approach? [~stack] [~anoop.hbase]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17597:
--
Affects Version/s: 1.3.0
1.2.4
1.1.8
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855175#comment-15855175
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
{quote}
This is a little unsettling.
{quote}
Yeah for end user
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17606:
-
Summary: Fix failing tests introduced by HBASE-17508
Key: HBASE-17606
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17606:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17606.patch
> Fix failing TestRpcControllerFactory introduced by HBASE-17508
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17606:
--
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> Fix failing TestRpcControllerFactory introduced by HBASE-17508
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17402:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17607:
-
Summary: Rest api for scan should return 404 when table not exists
Key: HBASE-17607
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17607
Project: HBase
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855256#comment-15855256
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
Filed HBASE-17606 and HBASE-17607.
> Unify the implementation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855291#comment-15855291
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17606:
---
Will commit later if no objections.
> Fix failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855112#comment-15855112
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17402:
---
Will fix the star import and commit shortly.
> TestAsyncTableScan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17606:
--
Summary: Fix failing TestRpcControllerFactory introduced by HBASE-17508
(was: Fix failing tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15855192#comment-15855192
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
Thanks [~tedyu] for pointing out this. Let me open a issue to fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17606:
--
Description: (was: TestRpcControllerFactory and TestScannerResource.)
> Fix failing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17597:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Push
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17402:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17402-v1.patch
> TestAsyncTableScan sometimes hangs
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17606:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.4.0)
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.4.0)
> Fix failing
Duo Zhang created HBASE-17608:
-
Summary: Add suspend support for RawScanResultConsumer
Key: HBASE-17608
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17606:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Pushed to master. branch-1 does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17583:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17583-v2.patch
Add more comments.
> Add inclusive/exclusive support for startRow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15853009#comment-15853009
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
The failed UT is branch-1 only and introduced in HBASE-17238. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17508:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
Release Note: Now the scan.setSmall method is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17597:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17597-branch-1.patch
Rewrite the test with HTU.waitFor.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17597:
--
Assignee: Duo Zhang
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17508?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15852996#comment-15852996
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17508:
---
Let me check the failed UT.
> Unify the implementation of small
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17595:
--
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
When implementing other stuffs for scan I found that it is not easy to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-17505.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
The logic has been implemented by HBASE-17508.
> Do not issue close scanner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17505:
--
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.3.0)
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.1)
> Do not issue close
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15856119#comment-15856119
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17571:
---
After reviewing the API, I do not think we need to provide a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17599-v2.patch
Moved the implementation hint to the comment of the field. Rename
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15858909#comment-15858909
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17603:
---
What if the table is deleted after the existence check but still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17599-v3.patch
Fix comment.
> Use mayHaveMoreCellsInRow instead of isPartial
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17599:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17599-branch-1.patch
Patch for branch-1.
> Use mayHaveMoreCellsInRow instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15858908#comment-15858908
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17599:
---
{quote}
We should just remove it in the patch for master branch?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15858943#comment-15858943
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17603:
---
I mean the http code for rest-client.
> Rest api for scan should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15858973#comment-15858973
]
Duo Zhang commented on HBASE-17603:
---
Yes it is possible. But if you bypass the meta cache the meta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Duo Zhang updated HBASE-17608:
--
Attachment: HBASE-17608-v1.patch
Missed the two new files.
> Add suspend support for
901 - 1000 of 18439 matches
Mail list logo
