[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13708839#comment-13708839
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8909:
--
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12592365/hbase-8909_v3.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in .
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6344//console
This message is automatically generated.
HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support
it for BC
--
Key: HBASE-8909
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Enis Soztutar
Assignee: Enis Soztutar
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2
Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch, hbase-8909_v2.patch,
hbase-8909_v3.patch
HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new
configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the
old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old
value. Remove it in 1.0.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709236#comment-13709236 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-8909: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #4256 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4256/]) HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (add missing file) (enis: rev 1503488) * /hbase/trunk/hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TestHBaseConfiguration.java HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (enis: rev 1503484) * /hbase/trunk/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/ClientScanner.java * /hbase/trunk/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HBaseConfiguration.java * /hbase/trunk/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java * /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch, hbase-8909_v2.patch, hbase-8909_v3.patch HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709249#comment-13709249 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-8909: --- FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.95 #327 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/327/]) HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (add missing file) (enis: rev 1503486) * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TestHBaseConfiguration.java HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (enis: rev 1503485) * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/ClientScanner.java * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HBaseConfiguration.java * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch, hbase-8909_v2.patch, hbase-8909_v3.patch HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709273#comment-13709273 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-8909: --- SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #617 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0/617/]) HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (add missing file) (enis: rev 1503488) * /hbase/trunk/hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TestHBaseConfiguration.java HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (enis: rev 1503484) * /hbase/trunk/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/ClientScanner.java * /hbase/trunk/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HBaseConfiguration.java * /hbase/trunk/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java * /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch, hbase-8909_v2.patch, hbase-8909_v3.patch HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13709292#comment-13709292 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-8909: --- FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2 #180 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2/180/]) HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (add missing file) (enis: rev 1503486) * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/TestHBaseConfiguration.java HBASE-8909. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC (enis: rev 1503485) * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/client/ClientScanner.java * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HBaseConfiguration.java * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/HConstants.java * /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/HRegionServer.java HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch, hbase-8909_v2.patch, hbase-8909_v3.patch HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13707839#comment-13707839 ] stack commented on HBASE-8909: -- +1 Make sure above test failure is transient before commit. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch, hbase-8909_v2.patch HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13707554#comment-13707554
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8909:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12592104/hbase-8909_v1.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified tests.
{color:red}-1 patch{color}. The patch command could not apply the patch.
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6318//console
This message is automatically generated.
HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support
it for BC
--
Key: HBASE-8909
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Enis Soztutar
Assignee: Enis Soztutar
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2
Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch
HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new
configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the
old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old
value. Remove it in 1.0.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13707557#comment-13707557 ] Devaraj Das commented on HBASE-8909: The patch looks good overall. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13707641#comment-13707641
]
Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-8909:
--
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12592114/hbase-8909_v2.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified tests.
{color:green}+1 hadoop1.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
1.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 hadoop2.0{color}. The patch compiles against the hadoop
2.0 profile.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 lineLengths{color}. The patch does not introduce lines
longer than 100
{color:green}+1 site{color}. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.
{color:red}-1 core tests{color}. The patch failed these unit tests:
org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestCheckTestClasses
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
Findbugs warnings:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6321//console
This message is automatically generated.
HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support
it for BC
--
Key: HBASE-8909
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909
Project: HBase
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Enis Soztutar
Assignee: Enis Soztutar
Priority: Critical
Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2
Attachments: hbase-8909_v1.patch, hbase-8909_v2.patch
HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new
configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the
old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old
value. Remove it in 1.0.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13703989#comment-13703989 ] Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-8909: -- I wonder whether we should do a sweep of the other configuration changes, if there are any. HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-8909) HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13704019#comment-13704019 ] Devaraj Das commented on HBASE-8909: bq. I wonder whether we should do a sweep of the other configuration changes, if there are any. +1 - that would save some upgrade-to-96 hiccups (at least in some cases). HBASE-6170 broke hbase.regionserver.lease.period config, we should support it for BC -- Key: HBASE-8909 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8909 Project: HBase Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Enis Soztutar Assignee: Enis Soztutar Priority: Critical Fix For: 0.98.0, 0.95.2 HBASE-6170 replaces hbase.regionserver.lease.period with the new configuration hbase.client.scanner.timeout.period. We should support the old configuration at least in 0.96. We can put a WARN and deprecate the old value. Remove it in 1.0. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
