[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-05 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15363610#comment-15363610 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16157: SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-1.4 #273 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-05 Thread Enis Soztutar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15363212#comment-15363212 ] Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-16157: --- [~ted_yu] is this committed? Why it is still open with no

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-05 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15363008#comment-15363008 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16157: FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-Trunk_matrix #1174 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-05 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15362806#comment-15362806 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-16157: +1 on v4. > The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-05 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15362799#comment-15362799 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-16157: Failed tests:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-04 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15361766#comment-15361766 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16157: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-04 Thread ChiaPing Tsai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15361627#comment-15361627 ] ChiaPing Tsai commented on HBASE-16157: --- Do I need to delete the older patch before re-attaching ?

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-04 Thread Ted Yu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15361620#comment-15361620 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-16157: ChiaPing: If you re-attach the patch, QA would run the tests. > The

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-01 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359978#comment-15359978 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16157: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-01 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359801#comment-15359801 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16157: FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-Trunk_matrix #1151 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-01 Thread ChiaPing Tsai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359521#comment-15359521 ] ChiaPing Tsai commented on HBASE-16157: --- It seem to me the v4 patch is better. The reasons are

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-01 Thread Hudson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359510#comment-15359510 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16157: FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-Trunk_matrix #1150 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-01 Thread Hadoop QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359488#comment-15359488 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-16157: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-01 Thread ChiaPing Tsai (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359358#comment-15359358 ] ChiaPing Tsai commented on HBASE-16157: --- The TestLruBlockCache#testCurrentSize may fail because the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16157) The incorrect block cache count and size are caused by removing duplicate block key in the LruBlockCache

2016-07-01 Thread Enis Soztutar (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15359310#comment-15359310 ] Enis Soztutar commented on HBASE-16157: --- lgtm. Is the test stable enough? Looks like it might end