[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2019-12-13 Thread Hive QA (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16995693#comment-16995693 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-9736: --- Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2019-12-12 Thread Mithun Radhakrishnan (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16995221#comment-16995221 ] Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-9736: [~zshao], sorry I missed your comment. You're

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2019-01-25 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16752550#comment-16752550 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-9736: --- Here are the results of testing the latest attachment:

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2019-01-25 Thread Zheng Shao (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16752547#comment-16752547 ] Zheng Shao commented on HIVE-9736: -- Are we sure that FileSystem.listStatus(Path[]) is faster than a loop

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-06-16 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588792#comment-14588792 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-9736: --- {color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-06-16 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14588814#comment-14588814 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: Looks like we have a regression :

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-09 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14536981#comment-14536981 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-9736: --- {color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-08 Thread Lefty Leverenz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14534035#comment-14534035 ] Lefty Leverenz commented on HIVE-9736: -- Doc note: This adds configuration parameter

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-08 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14535528#comment-14535528 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: I did not find this in the precommit

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-07 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14532252#comment-14532252 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: Sorry about the null-check, yup, I meant

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-06 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531704#comment-14531704 ] Sergio Peña commented on HIVE-9736: --- Hi [~mithun] This patch is causing the above tests

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-06 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531722#comment-14531722 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: Hi Sergio, thanks for the catch, have

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-06 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531800#comment-14531800 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: The problem, as Sergio mentions, is that

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-06 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531809#comment-14531809 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: Also, since this is a performance patch

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-06 Thread Mithun Radhakrishnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531885#comment-14531885 ] Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-9736: @[~sushanth]: Quick question about

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-06 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531961#comment-14531961 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - I apologize for missing this in my code review.

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-06 Thread Mithun Radhakrishnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14531851#comment-14531851 ] Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-9736: [~spena], [~sushanth], thanks for

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-05 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528348#comment-14528348 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-9736: --- {color:red}Overall{color}: -1 at least one tests failed

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-05 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528696#comment-14528696 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: +1 : Have looked through patch and it

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-05 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14528724#comment-14528724 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - [~sushanth], thank you for your review and the

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-04 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14527362#comment-14527362 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - Just as a reminder, we were asked to check the

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-04 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14527506#comment-14527506 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - I verified with both {{-Phadoop-2}} and

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-04 Thread Mithun Radhakrishnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14527314#comment-14527314 ] Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-9736: Thanks for the review, Chris.

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-05-04 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14527348#comment-14527348 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - I figured we could make

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-30 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14522338#comment-14522338 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: (Note that given that HIVE-9681 has now

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-29 Thread Mithun Radhakrishnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14518834#comment-14518834 ] Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-9736: Hello, Chris. bq. ... we can

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-29 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14518943#comment-14518943 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: Hi, just so this gets into the precommit

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-29 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14520508#comment-14520508 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: [~thejas], could you please review this

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-29 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14520892#comment-14520892 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - I have one remaining comment in Review Board

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-29 Thread Hive QA (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14520852#comment-14520852 ] Hive QA commented on HIVE-9736: --- {color:red}Overall{color}: -1 no tests executed Here are

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-28 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14518695#comment-14518695 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - Hi [~mithun]. Thank you for uploading a new

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-13 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14492966#comment-14492966 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - Thank you for the rebased patch. It looks great

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-08 Thread Sushanth Sowmyan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14486151#comment-14486151 ] Sushanth Sowmyan commented on HIVE-9736: I've not looked at this patch in detail

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-08 Thread Chris Nauroth (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14486193#comment-14486193 ] Chris Nauroth commented on HIVE-9736: - Hi [~mithun]. Great ideas in this patch! I'd

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-9736) StorageBasedAuthProvider should batch namenode-calls where possible.

2015-04-08 Thread Mithun Radhakrishnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-9736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14486260#comment-14486260 ] Mithun Radhakrishnan commented on HIVE-9736: @[~cnauroth]: Good to meet you,