zacharymorn commented on pull request #101:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/101#issuecomment-840934854
Hi @jpountz, upon further reviewing the result above, I found one issue for
this particular scorer implementation (but not for the other BulkScorer based
implementations).
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17344183#comment-17344183
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-9956:
-
Yeah, I think it's worth seeing if {{rewrite}} can be used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17344171#comment-17344171
]
Gautam Worah commented on LUCENE-9956:
--
+1 on exposing the {{getDrillDownQueries}} API for
gautamworah96 opened a new pull request #138:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/138
# Description
It would be great if users could access the baseQuery of a DrillDownQuery. I
think this can be useful for folks who want to access/test the clauses of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17344134#comment-17344134
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-9956:
-
Another thought on this, which may-or-may not be applicable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17344047#comment-17344047
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-9956:
-
It seems reasonable to me to make this method public, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nhat Nguyen resolved LUCENE-9935.
-
Fix Version/s: 9.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Bulk merges for stored fields when index sorting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nhat Nguyen reassigned LUCENE-9935:
---
Assignee: Nhat Nguyen
> Bulk merges for stored fields when index sorting is enabled
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17343995#comment-17343995
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9827:
-
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-9827:
Fix Version/s: 8.9
> Small segments are slower to merge due to stored fields since 8.7
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17343895#comment-17343895
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-9827:
-
Commit
rmuir merged pull request #2495:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17343864#comment-17343864
]
Greg Miller commented on LUCENE-9944:
-
Adding a comment here mostly for myself so I don't forget:
I
neoremind commented on pull request #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/91#issuecomment-840385022
Comment addressed.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jpountz commented on pull request #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/91#issuecomment-840377637
Can we test it in TestStableMSBRadixSorter too? It would be a pity if bugs
in StableMSBRadixSorter were only caught by tests for points.
--
This is an automated message from the
neoremind commented on pull request #91:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/91#issuecomment-840373136
> This looks good to me. Can we better check that the sort is actually
stable in the tests? E.g. maybe we could verify that the arrays are not only
equal after sorting with
rmuir commented on pull request #2495:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2495#issuecomment-840359926
Also tested a basic worst-case performance check with geonames (the
standalone Indexer.java from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9827)
which uses
17 matches
Mail list logo
