dungba88 opened a new pull request #254:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/254
# Description
There is an issue which causes an `AssertionError` in the backtrace step of
`JapaneseTokenizer`. If there is a text span of length 1024 (determined by
`MAX_BACKTRACE_GAP`) where
Anh Dung Bui created LUCENE-10059:
-
Summary: Assertion error in JapaneseTokenizer backtrace
Key: LUCENE-10059
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10059
Project: Lucene - Core
madrob commented on pull request #200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/200#issuecomment-902273699
@rmuir - do you have thoughts on this, since it looks like you were the last
person in this code way back in 2014
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401848#comment-17401848
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
Commit
msokolov merged pull request #252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/252
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
msokolov closed pull request #252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/252
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
msokolov commented on a change in pull request #252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/252#discussion_r692447161
##
File path: lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/IndexFiles.java
##
@@ -153,6 +163,10 @@ public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
dweiss commented on a change in pull request #252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/252#discussion_r692388454
##
File path: lucene/demo/src/java/org/apache/lucene/demo/IndexFiles.java
##
@@ -153,6 +163,10 @@ public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401799#comment-17401799
]
xiaoshi commented on LUCENE-10051:
--
This error is the same as LUCENE-10058, I will fix it there.
>
xiaoshi2013 opened a new pull request #253:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/253
When running ./gradlew lucene:benchmark:run, the default thread name is main
not ParallelTaskThread, StringIndexOutOfBoundsException error is thrown.
I set the threadIndex default value to 0 to
uschindler commented on pull request #252:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/252#issuecomment-902087301
This looks very well, now the dict file is created using IndexOutput and
read in using IndexInput. And it is also stored in index directory. I am not
sure if storing in index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401732#comment-17401732
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
I tweaked Dawid's patch here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
xiaoshi updated LUCENE-10058:
-
Labels: newdev (was: )
> lucene main run ./gradlew lucene:benchmark:run error
>
xiaoshi2013 closed pull request #2556:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/2556
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
xiaoshi created LUCENE-10058:
Summary: lucene main run ./gradlew lucene:benchmark:run error
Key: LUCENE-10058
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10058
Project: Lucene - Core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401717#comment-17401717
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10052:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401715#comment-17401715
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10052:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10052?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401716#comment-17401716
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10052:
--
Commit
mikemccand commented on a change in pull request #251:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/251#discussion_r692192328
##
File path: lucene/core/src/test/org/apache/lucene/search/TestKnnVectorQuery.java
##
@@ -350,7 +350,9 @@ public void testDeletes() throws IOException {
jtibshirani commented on pull request #251:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/251#issuecomment-901987142
I think that if k <= n, the number of documents, then ideally we'd always
retrieve k neighbors. I opted to disable the assertion for now instead of
making a fix, since we're
jtibshirani opened a new pull request #251:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/251
TestKnnVectorQuery#testDeletes assumes that if there are n total documents,
we
can perform a kNN search with k=n and retrieve all documents. This isn't true
with our implementation -- due to
gsmiller commented on a change in pull request #240:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/240#discussion_r692105614
##
File path: lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java
##
@@ -659,9 +614,12 @@ public TopFieldDocs reduce(Collection
collectors)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401680#comment-17401680
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-10057:
Hi, the fix to use directory looks fine. I don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401673#comment-17401673
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
I think it works because those tests prepare the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401672#comment-17401672
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
Oh! You are indeed correct, this logic is flawed.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401666#comment-17401666
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
If you leave an unclosed mapped buffer then no - closing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401661#comment-17401661
]
Michael Sokolov edited comment on LUCENE-10057 at 8/19/21, 12:24 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401661#comment-17401661
]
Michael Sokolov commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
Oh, did my stab at this not work? I was unable to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401172#comment-17401172
]
Mayya Sharipova edited comment on LUCENE-10054 at 8/19/21, 11:44 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401172#comment-17401172
]
Mayya Sharipova edited comment on LUCENE-10054 at 8/19/21, 11:42 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401172#comment-17401172
]
Mayya Sharipova edited comment on LUCENE-10054 at 8/19/21, 11:22 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401172#comment-17401172
]
Mayya Sharipova edited comment on LUCENE-10054 at 8/19/21, 11:16 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401615#comment-17401615
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
Well, this works but I scratch my head over whether it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dawid Weiss updated LUCENE-10057:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-10057.patch
> Replace direct mmaped buffer with Lucene abstractions in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17401576#comment-17401576
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-10057:
--
Uwe:
{code}
To fix the demo issue: In KNNVectorDict demo
Dawid Weiss created LUCENE-10057:
Summary: Replace direct mmaped buffer with Lucene abstractions in
KnnVectorDict
Key: LUCENE-10057
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10057
Project:
36 matches
Mail list logo