[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-02-10 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 Thx for your work. I will get back to you soon. Right now I am working on branch SUREFIRE-1463 which contains few fixes. I plan to finish this, including build script, and then I would

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-02-09 Thread bindul
Github user bindul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 @Tibor17 I have reviewed the Maven Coordinates documentation you mentioned, and I can switch the order of elements in the parameter easily. However, I think I would disagree with

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-01-13 Thread bindul
Github user bindul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 @Tibor17, Sorry I misunderstood your first comment. Thank you again for taking the time to review the changes and for your patience. I will rework the pull request using your

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-01-13 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 @bindul Then we have to support also other alternatives: `groupId:artifactId:version`, and `groupId:artifactId:packaging:version`. This means you have to, first of all, count

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-01-13 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 @binduk We have modify the maven coordinates to `groupId:artifactId:packaging:classifier:version`, see the docs: https://maven.apache.org/pom.html#Maven_Coordinates Basically,

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-01-12 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 I don't want you to remove code. I will try to explain in code. ---

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-01-12 Thread bindul
Github user bindul commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 @Tibor17 Thank you for your review. I agree with you that `version` check is not really useful in this use case, I put it in there as the JIRA ticket called for GAVT support and also

[GitHub] maven-surefire issue #173: [SUREFIRE-1004] Support full gavtc format for dep...

2018-01-12 Thread Tibor17
Github user Tibor17 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/173 The comments like this `// Check version` are not needed because it's obvious from code. You may remove them or extract that part to private static methods. It's up to you. If you