GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3193
NIFI-5854 Added TimeUnit enhancements (microseconds, decimal parsing)
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/445
You can also look at
[`CryptographicHashContent`](https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/148#discussion_r236898636
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-data-model/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/extension/ExtensionBundleVersionMetadata.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/148#discussion_r236860010
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-data-model/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/extension/ExtensionBundleVersionMetadata.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/148#discussion_r236860247
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-data-model/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/extension/ExtensionBundleVersionMetadata.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/148#discussion_r236859763
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-data-model/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/extension/ExtensionBundleVersionMetadata.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/148#discussion_r236840513
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-data-model/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/extension/ExtensionBundleVersionMetadata.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/148#discussion_r236840020
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-data-model/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/extension/ExtensionBundleVersionMetadata.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/148#discussion_r236839456
--- Diff:
nifi-registry-core/nifi-registry-data-model/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/registry/extension/ExtensionBundleVersionMetadata.java
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3180
NIFI-5833 Treat GetTwitter API properties as sensitive
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3137
Can you please add some explanation for why this change is submitted,
documentation, and at least one unit test? Thank you.
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3024
Verified by sending curl POST commands with a client certificate to upload
a template. With the `Origin` header set to a remote domain, the request is
blocked with the response "Invalid
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2936
There are definitely inconsistencies throughout the project as this wasn't
always a firm policy and there are many different contributors to the project.
As you noted, we have tried to tighten
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2936
Hi @lukepfarrar , we have a policy of not evaluating EL in password fields.
Here is [an example of that review
process](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712821
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2956#discussion_r221672221
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-neo4j-bundle/nifi-neo4j-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/neo4j/AbstractNeo4JCypherExecutor.java
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3032
@colindean the releases aren't on a set schedule and are decided by
discussion on the d...@nifi.apache.org mailing list, but I think you're right
in your feeling that a release is probably coming
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3035
NIFI-5628 Added content length check to OkHttpReplicationClient.
Added unit tests.
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2872
I think there should be a Maven module for the test harness which is
disabled by default and can be activated with a flag like `mvn clean test
-Ptest-harness`.
---
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2956#discussion_r219954907
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-neo4j-bundle/nifi-neo4j-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/neo4j/TestNeo4JCyperExecutor.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2956#discussion_r219953983
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-neo4j-bundle/nifi-neo4j-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/neo4j/AbstractNeo4JCypherExecutor.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2956#discussion_r219953428
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-neo4j-bundle/nifi-neo4j-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/neo4j/AbstractNeo4JCypherExecutor.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2956#discussion_r219953286
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-neo4j-bundle/nifi-neo4j-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/neo4j/AbstractNeo4JCypherExecutor.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2956#discussion_r219953129
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-neo4j-bundle/nifi-neo4j-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/neo4j/AbstractNeo4JCypherExecutor.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2956#discussion_r219952904
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-neo4j-bundle/nifi-neo4j-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/neo4j/AbstractNeo4JCypherExecutor.java
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3024
Reviewing...
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020
Thanks for your submission. I left some comments, specifically on the
`password` fields and a field containing a regex for attribute headers.
`GetHTTP` and `PostHTTP` are legacy processors
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219714056
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PostHTTP.java
---
@@ -726,7
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219714049
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PostHTTP.java
---
@@ -474,8
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219714033
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PostHTTP.java
---
@@ -183,26
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219714031
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/PostHTTP.java
---
@@ -211,25
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712932
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/InvokeHTTP.java
---
@@ -714,11
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712935
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/InvokeHTTP.java
---
@@ -947,11
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712916
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/InvokeHTTP.java
---
@@ -367,6
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712927
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/InvokeHTTP.java
---
@@ -632,7
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712894
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/InvokeHTTP.java
---
@@ -318,6
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712848
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/GetHTTP.java
---
@@ -438,8
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3020#discussion_r219712821
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/GetHTTP.java
---
@@ -177,19
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3018
I believe @joewitt backed out the OkHttp changes from
[NIFI-4806](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4806) (my previous note
in the Jira) and is instead doing them in
[NIFI-5623](https
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/3018
NIFI-5622 Updated test resource keystores and truststores with Subjecâ¦
â¦tAlternativeNames to be compliant with RFC 6125.
Refactored some test code to be clearer.
Renamed some
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-registry/pull/142
@kevdoran any reason you decided on 18.0 for guava? Looks like the most
recent release is 26.0 [Guava](https://github.com/google/guava).
---
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2991#discussion_r218868215
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/HandleHttpRequest.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983#discussion_r218132155
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/security/util/crypto/HashServiceTest.groovy
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/398
Thanks @phrocker . LGTM but my C++ is pretty rusty so I'm going to let
@apiri or @achristianson give the +1 if they can.
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2999
I looked at the code, and the documentation change is syntactically valid,
but I am not familiar enough with MongoDB to assert that the content is
correct. You will need a reviewer who is a MongoDB
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2999
Hi @josephxsxn I don't think we have to request that any more as GitHub
shows the consolidated diff in one view, and rebasing & force-pushing to a
branch that is used for a PR destroys his
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
Thanks. I may have published the wrong version of the template. I had a
process group with processors configured to work with the current behavior, as
well as one with the properties configured
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
@thenatog are you seeing behavior that conflicts with the description of
expected behavior for configuration 1 if you reproduce the test case Otto
described in his PR above?
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
Those attributes were added by @ottobackwards in the original PR for this
issue. My understanding of the scenarios is as follows:
**Flowfile A**
*username*: `alopresto`
*email
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
Based on @thenatog 's comment on [PR
2980](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980#issuecomment-419574743) which
captured a Java Big Endian Byte Order Mark (BOM) being inserted in UTF-16
strings
Github user alopresto closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980
Thanks for discovering this @thenatog . This is an excellent catch.
I've added behavior to catch this, better documentation, and unit tests.
However, I added them on the branch
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
I added a `.keep` file in that directory.
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2989
Thanks for making the requested changes. In general, please try to avoid
rebasing in PRs as it loses the history of the interactions. The
reviewer/committer should handle that when merging
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2989#discussion_r215465715
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-jetty/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/server/JettyServer.java
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
@ottobackwards I've run this branch with the full build and all tests
enabled multiple times and I have not encountered that error (just did it again
from scratch with no `.m2` to be sure; 41:24
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2989
Verified that the header is present on responses.
Ran `contrib-check` and all tests pass. +1 if you re-order the
dependencies.
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2989
Reviewing...
---
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2989#discussion_r215092182
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-security/pom.xml
---
@@ -154,5 +154,20 @@
jettison
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2987
Thanks for reporting the context around that. If you're comfortable doing
it, you can open a Jira to resolve that problem
[here](https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2987#discussion_r215046005
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/JoltTransformJSON.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2987#discussion_r215021556
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/JoltTransformJSON.java
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2987
What errors are you encountering when building with tests?
---
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983#discussion_r214979973
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/HashAttribute.java
---
@@ -51,6
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980#discussion_r214979341
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/security/util/crypto/HashService.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980#discussion_r214979088
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/security/util/crypto/HashAlgorithm.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2984#discussion_r214774007
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/RouteText.java
---
@@ -655,14
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2984
NIFI-5569 Added keywords to Route* and ScanAttribute processors to imâ¦
â¦prove discoverability.
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
I created two templates that should help with testing the new behavior and
ensuring that upgrading a flow that uses the old components doesn't break it.
* [Hash Components
(Legacy)](https
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2983
NIFI-5566 Improve HashContent processor and standardize HashAttribute
processor
### This PR should not be merged before [PR
2980](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980)
This PR
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2977
Reviewing...
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2982
Verified that this sets the defaults to "JKS" for both keystore and
truststore on `StandardSSLContextService` and
`StandardRestrictedSSLContextService`.
Ran `contrib-check` and
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2836
I didn't capture every detail of the issue in the Jira because I planned on
writing it myself. However, some of the behavior (empty input should still
return a hash, etc.) was standard. Yes, please
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2982
Reviewing...
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2836
I started reviewing this PR but realized it did not implement many of the
behaviors I had needed in the original ticket. I opened [PR
2980](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980) which includes
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980#discussion_r214265868
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/security/util/crypto/HashAlgorithm.java
---
@@ -0,0
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980
This encapsulates the changes @ottobackwards made in [PR
2836](https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2836), but also:
* Adds the *SHA-224, SHA-512/224, SHA-512/256, SHA-3 (SHA3-224, SHA3-256
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2980
NIFI-5147 Implement CalculateAttributeHash processor
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2836#discussion_r214223024
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestCalculateAttributeHash.java
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2836#discussion_r214222959
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/TestCalculateAttributeHash.java
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2976
Ran `contrib-check` and all tests pass. +1, merging.
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2973
Thanks Pierre. Running a final check and will merge.
---
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2973#discussion_r214106940
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-bundle/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-task/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/reporting
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2976
Reviewing...
---
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2973#discussion_r213905518
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-bundle/nifi-site-to-site-reporting-task/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/reporting
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2973#discussion_r213905074
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-extension-utils/nifi-reporting-utils/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/reporting/util/provenance/ProvenanceEventConsumer.java
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2973
I created a flow which uses 3 `GenerateFlowFile` processors (named
_Component A_, _Component A_, and _Component A (B)_) to evaluate the new
filtering behavior. Each generates a flowfile
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2975
Ran `contrib-check` and all tests pass. +1, merging.
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2975
Reviewing...
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2972
Merging.
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2972
The issue that was encountered by some users was that the previous
mechanism for creating a test `NiFiProperties` instance was
`NiFiProperties.createBasicNiFiProperties(String filePath, Map
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2972
NIFI-5558 Fixed unit test to avoid contamination from System propertyâ¦
⦠"nifi.properties.file.path" when creating test NiFiProperties instance.
Thank you for submitting a co
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2960
Ran a flow with multiple `GenerateFlowFile` processors creating flowfiles
with a `0 sec` schedule and feeding to a `LogAttribute` processor. Was able to
process ~350k flowfiles in about a minute
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2960
Reviewing...
---
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2959
As discovered by @bbende , I introduced a bug in my commit
[f60585a](https://github.com/apache/nifi/commit/f60585a9b6df6b3b28be1eb80a0a60deac6c0493#diff-882d0904bb315ac8a455aec69e6d44d8)
as part
GitHub user alopresto opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2959
NIFI-5540 Provide default `nifi.sensitive.props.key` value if none provided
in cluster communications
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615
@MikeThomsen I would maybe put a comment in the `src/test/java/.gitignore`
file explaining why it's there so someone in the future doesn't see it as a
superfluous tooling artifact and remove
Github user alopresto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2615#discussion_r210029087
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-elasticsearch-bundle/nifi-elasticsearch-client-service/pom.xml
---
@@ -127,8 +133,113 @@
5.6.8
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2936
@danieljimenez correct, PRs merged now will be included in the next
release. Because our *bug fix* releases (`x.x.1`) do not include feature work,
this will be in the next *minor* release, which
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2919
I merged this but made two changes. First, the `nifi-web-utils` tests were
not running, because they are Groovy tests and there is nothing in
`src/test/java`. Without a file (even empty
Github user alopresto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2935
@pepov I've incorporated your PKCS #8 to PKCS #1 code and made some
refactorings. Thank you.
---
1 - 100 of 957 matches
Mail list logo
