GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199
NIFI-3248: Improvement of GetSolr Processor
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user JohannesDaniel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2196
---
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2196
NIFI-3248
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145612359
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -126,6 +126,14
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145404225
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -172,157 +203,196
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145403415
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -66,42 +79,64
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145405902
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrProcessor.java
---
@@ -275,7
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145404160
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -138,10 +168,11
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145403786
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -66,42 +79,64
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145408461
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/test/resources/solr/testCollection/conf/schema.xml
---
@@ -16,6 +16,16
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145415068
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrProcessor.java
---
@@ -275,7
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145946147
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -66,42 +79,72
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199
I dont think that the timezone and the commit issues are still important.
GetSolr now takes the timestamp directly from the results. Commit delays wont
be a problem as the state is only
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285
NIFI-4583 Restructure nifi-solr-processors
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285
Restructured the methods as discussed in JIRA. Additionally, I improved the
unit tests for GetSolr
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285
(tested both processors in local build)
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285#discussion_r154523361
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,202
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2700
NIFI-5189 Schema name is not available for RecordSchema
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2700
@markap14 I wanted to fix this before finishing the XMLRecordSetWriter. I
especially expect beginners to use the schema access via the text property -
they should not run into this problem.
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2700
Discussion related to this ticket:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r186106245
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675
@markap14 implemented changes as discussed
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r187592686
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r187549020
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r187560805
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675
NIFI-5113 Add XMLRecordSetWriter
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675
Hi @markap14
here we go!
Initially, I planned to enable this writer also to write XML attributes,
but that would have required a complex workaround. Furthermore, it would
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r186106598
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2675#discussion_r186106245
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2736
NIFI-5223 Allow the usage of expression language for properties of Reâ¦
â¦cordSetWriters
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145712892
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -66,42 +79,72
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145719121
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -66,42 +79,72
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145720938
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -66,42 +79,72
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145721674
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -66,42 +79,72
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145727845
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
---
@@ -170,159 +210,213
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285#discussion_r159122676
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrProcessor.java
---
@@ -34,39
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285#discussion_r159122738
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrProcessor.java
---
@@ -34,39
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285#discussion_r159122745
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrProcessor.java
---
@@ -34,39
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285
I replaced the values by static imports
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285#discussion_r159123401
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrProcessor.java
---
@@ -34,39
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285
I made TestGetSolr a bit more simpler by adding a method for the generic
creation of TestRunners. I moved all remaining PropertyDescriptors from
SolrProcessor to SolrUtils
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285
@ijokarumawak not too important, but do you know why this commit is not
linked to my account? it is linked to "U-WOODMARK\johannes.peter"
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2285
Ah I see. Sorry for this. Will we leave it as it (for this commit) is or
can we fix this?
---
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2516
Nifi 4516
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2516
@ijokarumawak
To be aligned with processor GetSolr I implemented two options for the data
format of Solr results: Solr XML and record functions. However, facets and
stats are written
Github user JohannesDaniel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2516
---
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
NIFI-4516 FetchSolr Processor
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@ijokarumawak
To be aligned with processor GetSolr I implemented two options for the data
format of Solr results: Solr XML and record functions. However, facets and
stats are written
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517#discussion_r173530358
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/test/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/TestFetchSolr.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,380
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517#discussion_r173530516
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/FetchSolr.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,401
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
Tested the processor in a local build where it worked as expected.
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517#discussion_r173614856
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/FetchSolr.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,401
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
Refactored the treatment of flowfiles routed to relationship ORIGINAL. More
attributes are added to flowfiles for better descriptions of requests /
responses. Additionally, I adjusted some
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517#discussion_r173516051
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/SolrUtils.java
---
@@ -66,6 +67,15
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517#discussion_r173515717
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/FetchSolr.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,401
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517#discussion_r173516196
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/FetchSolr.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,401
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen Yeah, this time I looked at this, but haven't had time to fix
this. I think I have to merge master into the branch due to updates. Local
build worked. But thanks for the ping :)
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen omg. now there are commits of others in the branch?? maybe I
should simply close this PR and insert the code into a new branch.
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen or is this a normal thing that the commits of others are shown
here after the rebase?
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen rebased everything, build for solr processors works without
any problems. however, when I try to build the whole application, I receive the
following error:
[ERROR] Failed
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen done :)
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181213403
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181215801
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181217494
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181213473
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181215337
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
@markap14 thank you for the comprehensive review. I will start refactoring
the implementations with respect to the improvements that are clear.
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181218609
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181221789
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen Thank you for your help with Git!!
@bbende
- Solr core is a test dependency again (I actually had a reason to add this
as a non-test dependency, but it was not a good
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@ottobackwards deep paging should be done with scrolling using cursor marks
(as it is done in GetSolr). simple paging can be done by sucessively increasing
the offset (start parameter
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181218182
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517#discussion_r181483327
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/QuerySolr.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,584
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@ottobackwards you made my day!
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen There are two tests that test Solr result paging:
```
testRetrievalOfFullResults()
testRetrievalOfFullResults2()
```
What do you mean exactly? A test
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@ottobackwards When I try this I always run into the same problem:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project nifi-livy-processors: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen I'm still impeded, because my Maven does not download the
NIFI-SNAPSHOTS. It downloads all dependencies except the SNAPSHOTS. When I
follow the links (e. g.
https
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
(means in 5-6 hous)
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
hi @MikeThomsen I will upload the changes this evening.
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen
- added provenance receive notifications
- added tests for attributes
- added upper limit of solr start parameter (1)
- enhanced documentation for upper limit
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
@markap14 thank you for the response.
I will simply remove that record tag validation as there are indeed many
ways to do that before the data is processed by this reader
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181851731
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r181653767
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2650
@MikeThomsen Hi, just saw that GetSolr does not create receive provenance
events when data is retrieved and written into flowfiles. Added that.
---
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2650
NIFI-5106 Add provenance reporting to GetSolr
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
@markap14 thanks for the help with the patch file. I am fine with it :)
If you have not planned to do that yourself, I would start implementing a
XMLWriter as soon as this has been
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r183489279
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
@markap14
- Added EL for record format property
- Removed record tag validation
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
@markap14 @pvillard31
- I refactored some code as the cases (coerce==true && drop==false) and
(coerce==false && drop==true) in some cases showed an unexpected behavior
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen I will keep an eye on the CI tests in the future, thanks for
the advice. Actually, I did not take them into account as they frequently
appear to fail for no reason...
I tested
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r178470648
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/resources/docs
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r178470638
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/java/org/apache
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587#discussion_r178470625
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-services/nifi-record-serialization-services-bundle/nifi-record-serialization-services/src/main/resources/docs
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
Hi @pvillard31
thank you for your comments! I realized all your suggestions. I like your
news regarding the performance :-) Which kind of transformation did you test?
XML => Rec
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
Can you maybe post the XML that led to the empty record?
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
Hi @MikeThomsen
travic-ci test failed due to "The log length has exceeded the limit of 4 MB
(this usually means that the test suite is raising the same exception over and
GitHub user JohannesDaniel opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
NIFI-4185 Add XML Record Reader
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2587
@pvillard31 here we go :)
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
Oh, sorry. Done.
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen any news?
---
Github user JohannesDaniel commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2517
@MikeThomsen Any news?
---
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
