Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2827
@bbende thanks Bryan I will review shortly
---
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2628
Spoke with @alopresto offline. He highlighted that is it important to
maintain control of location of secure-hash.key file in order to prevent
calling application from piping into a file
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2628
@alopresto ran through test cases and this works as expected. One question
for you is there a way to designate an output location for the secure-hash.key
file? Such as if I want to pipe
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2628
@alopresto thanks for addressing this, happy to review. It does look like
Travis is failing on a ratcheck related error in nifi-toolkit-encrypt-config
---
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1997#discussion_r166648706
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-simulator-bundle/nifi-simulator-processors/src/main/java/com/apache/nifi/processors/simulator
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2107
@markap14 thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2065
thank you @jtstorck !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2107
NIFI-4310 - added changes to support detection of reporting tasks andâ¦
⦠controller services during isEmpty flow check. Added testing scenarios
Recommend the following tests
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2065
spoke with @jtstorck offline and we discussed refactoring a bit to ensure
that the logic for determining acls are externalized and staged within the
CompletableFuture chain. Committing those
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2065#discussion_r132969031
--- Diff:
nifi-toolkit/nifi-toolkit-zookeeper-migrator/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/toolkit/zkmigrator/ZooKeeperMigrator.java
---
@@ -269,15 +269,23
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2065#discussion_r132821753
--- Diff:
nifi-toolkit/nifi-toolkit-zookeeper-migrator/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/toolkit/zkmigrator/ZooKeeperMigrator.java
---
@@ -269,15 +269,23
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2065
NIFI-4255 - added flag to allow migration of existing (source) acls
Testing Recommendations:
Using a secured Zookeeper instance with predefined paths/znodes use the ZK
Migrator
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2046
@bbende thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2019
@mcgilman with the latest commit I was able to add a new node and see the
users.xml file populated. The node started successfully and I was able to
access the cluster without issue
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2019
I've worked through 3 Ranger configuration scenarios that leveraged the
ldap user group provider, or the composite configurable user group provider
(pairing the ldap provider with the file
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2019
@mcgilman will take a look soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1938
@markap14 that now looks fixed. I was able to use the Confluence schema
write strategy without issue. All is working as expected.
+1
will merge in shortly
---
If your
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1938
@markap14 thanks will check it out
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1938
@markap14 Iâm not quite sure if I ran into a configuration problem on my
part or if this is truly an issue. Iâm testing the ConfluentSchemaRegistry
and do have it set up in NiFi with two
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1956
@bbende did add the change to order (couldn't recreate the issue).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1938
@markap14 I can try this out as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1956
@bbende sorry for the delay (was away on vacation). Not a picky request at
all; the weirdness I ran into was that the xsd could not resolve the property
value if classpath was just before
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1957
Ran tests using FileZilla on Windows 10 Server with flow containing GetFTP
-> UpdateAttributes (for filename append) -> PutFTP. Worked as expected with
the below use cases:
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1957
@mattyb149 will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1956
@bbende would appreciate if you could review. Thanks in advance!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1956
NIFI-4135 - added hadoop-client and enhanced Authorizers entity to suâ¦
â¦pport classpath for resources entry
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1889
@brosander I've added updates to documentation as well as additional
verbose information as recommended. please let me know if you see any
additional issues
---
If your project is set up
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1889#discussion_r120722963
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1317,6 +1318,82 @@ cluster if restarted and the flow for the cluster
has
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1889
NIFI-3696 - initial commit of ConfigMigration and FileManager tools
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1866
@bbende can you please review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1866
NIFI-3984 - upgraded version to 0.2.1
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1786
@apiri validated ssh command on remote host with with start/stop/restart.
All worked as expected, with NiFi starting appropriately and the IO stream for
ssh was closed. Also validated
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1748
@joewitt thanks switched to refer to 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1748
NIFI-3793 - switch to use project.version
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736
@thesolson did the merge but corrected one small thing, tick marks on
controller were still missing. hope is was ok to apply.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736
Thanks Sarah for the updates
+1
Will squash and merge this shortly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114452389
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,146 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114451504
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,146 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114451288
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,146 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114450875
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,146 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114450829
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,146 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114433000
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,148 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114432596
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,148 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736#discussion_r114432248
--- Diff: nifi-docs/src/main/asciidoc/administration-guide.adoc ---
@@ -1176,6 +1176,148 @@ Secure Prompt
If you prefer not to provide
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1736
@thesolson thanks will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686
@alopresto actually Andy just noticed there's a conflict. If you could
resolve, squash and push I'll be happy to continue with merging into master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686
@alopresto ran tests with the following corner cases:
-flow running with normal shutdown invoked. NiFi shutdown and started
without issue
-flow running with kill -9 on process invoked
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686
@alopresto moving to a separate ticket makes sense. I have one more test to
run (run out of disk space per @markap14 suggestion) and will provide any
feedback shortly.
---
If your project
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1726
NIFI-3765 - Added a 'status' operation to Node Manager
The command for status is the following:
./node-manager.sh -d {nifi-installation-dir} -b {nifi-bootstrap-file} -o
status
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686
@alopresto Ran a test where I had an existing unencrypted provenance repo
and switched to the encrypted provider. The issues [you've
documented](https://github.com/alopresto/nifi/blob
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1686
@alopresto happy to do some functional testing of this as well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
Looks good to me, thanks @mcgilman !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
@mcgilman I addressed your comments above in the latest commit. Please let
me know if you have any additional questions or feedback.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
@mcgilman understood. It does makes sense to have more polite messaging
given this new case. I'll work on those changes and update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
@mcgilman and @brosander appreciate if you could take a look at this
enhancement.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1697
NIFI-3695 - added proxy dn flag to support providing authorized usernâ¦
â¦ame for secured environments
An updated version of documentation, with usage of the proxy flag is
attached
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669
@alopresto I addressed the comments to apply LdapName as well as other
minor corrections suggested
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669
@alopresto thanks so much for your feedback. I've made changes for your
review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669
@brosander I've chatted with @thesolson about documentation and she was
willing to help there. She will create a separate request in Jira for that
effort to add admin-toolkit info to the admin
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669
@brosander concerning the binaries they have a very small footprint so I
wasn't too concerned about including them (32K, 27K and 1K). I will work to
incorporate the cert generation test
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669#discussion_r112242565
--- Diff:
nifi-toolkit/nifi-toolkit-admin/src/main/groovy/org/apache/nifi/toolkit/admin/client/NiFiClientUtil.groovy
---
@@ -0,0 +1,156
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1678
@joewitt ran local test using smaller maxFileSize, maxHistory and
totalSizeCap settings. Created a flow that used LogAttribute heavily.
nifi-app.log appeared to rotate and was purged
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1678
@joewitt I will take a look, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669
@brosander thanks so much for reviewing! Concerning documentation I do have
a link attached. Will also look at the code changes you suggested.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669#discussion_r111814074
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-web-api/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/web
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1669
NIFI-3695 - created the nifi admin toolkit which includes shell scripâ¦
â¦ts and classes to support notification and basic node management in
standalone and clustered nifi
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1630
@markap14 reviewed and ran unit/performance tests with no issue.
+1
will merge shortly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1348
@scottyaslan @mcgilman @moranr would appreciate your input, especially on
recent styling changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1303
Re-tested with several combinations of empty values, system behaved as
expected, returning bad requests on invalid input and return 201 Created when
position values were available or position
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1303
Testing with a Rest Client API I was able to produce a null pointer
exception for the following case:
"position":{"x":null,"y":null}
"position":
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1303
@mcgilman reviewing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1319
Tested with 3 node cluster on Firefox, Safari and Chrome. Confirmed
existing in Firefox was resolved with patch.
+1
Will merge into master shortly.
---
If your project
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1348
NIFI-3010 - Incorporate Expression Language support for JoltTransformJSON
This PR contains several feature enhancements:
- Support of expression language within the specification
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1261
made it passed that issue however on subsequent test encoutered the
following (includes command executed):
HW11205:nifi-1.1.0 ydavis$
/Users/ydavis/dev/tools/nifi-1.1.0/toolkit/nifi
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1261
@alopresto I think I isolated part of the issue. Please confirm my use of
this command:
/Users/ydavis/dev/tools/nifi-1.1.0/toolkit/nifi-toolkit-1.1.0-pr-1261/bin/encrypt-config.sh
-b
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1261
was able to get more info I think on the problem in an attempt to recover
with migrating:
HW11205:nifi-1.1.0 ydavis$
/Users/ydavis/dev/tools/nifi-1.1.0/toolkit/nifi-toolkit-1.1.0-pr
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1261
Encountered issue while attempting the below test cases (3 node cluster):
#initial encryption
/Users/ydavis/dev/tools/nifi-1.1.0/toolkit/nifi-toolkit-1.1.0-pr-1261/bin/encrypt
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1261
@alopresto thanks Andy will confirm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1261
@alopresto reviewing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1221
@olegz I think @alopresto is taking over this PR and may create a new one,
per his comment
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1238
@alopresto was able to run tests both in IDE and Maven and reconfirmed test
scenarios worked as expected.
+1
Ready for merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1238
@alopresto agreed with fixing the test. I've actually logged the issue
here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-3060
Once that is addressed and you've updated your
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1238
@alopresto thanks for the update. Was able to retest with the following
scenarios:
encryption with fully commented file (as in the original template without
edits)
encryption
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1238
@alopresto just thought of a particular scenario. If a user defines a
provider with an identifier not equal to "ldap-provider" however has securable
properties like those found i
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1238
@alopresto actually correction, maven run of this test worked however
individual execution of test in my IDE does not so this may not be an issue,
probably a configuration problem on my end
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1238
@alopresto I rebased this with master and I have 7 tests are failing. I
believe this may be due to recent changes in logging for toolkit, since all
failed tests rely on assertions against
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1216
@alopresto I was able to test encrypt-config update with the following
scenarios:
tested encryption using new -l flag along with -n, - b, and -p flags (no
migration). nifi.properties
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1216
@alopresto will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1066
@brosander was able to run tests to generate certs with prefix and suffix
+1
Will merge into master shortly
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1066
@brosander will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1186
@alopresto re-ran the unit tests and scenarios looks good
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1186
@alopresto just to add clarity on unit test failures, I am specifically
receiving a problem when running the ConfigEncryptionToolTest. Several tests
are failing for me and the failure appears
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1186
@alopresto I also received problems running unit test but confirmed that I
could migrate keys using several scenarios:
raw key -> raw key
password -> password
password
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1186
@alopresto happy to review (understanding this is WIP)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1158
Was able to test toolkit successfully with following scenarios:
a) Run with both -F -f flags (allowing single file reference for
input/output) to ensure backwards compatibility
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1158
@brosander will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1068
@mcgilman was able to verify that both advanced UIs for UpdateAttributes
and JoltTransformProcessor were able to save configurations. Tests were
performed on standalone NiFi as well as cluster
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1068
will review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user YolandaMDavis commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1065
thx @mcgilman !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
GitHub user YolandaMDavis opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/1065
NIFI-2822 - Provide the JWT Authorization token
This change ensures that the JWT token used for authorization is added to
headers when using the $http service. Testing requires a secured
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
