https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #22 from jg ---
And also, save" without the "as." Even less exciting.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #21 from jg ---
And I know it's happened at least 3 times. So you're plain wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #20 from jg ---
You assume they are the same. The prudent thing would be to actually check
them. The "steps" I took are "save as." Not very exciting.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #19 from Keith N. McKenna ---
(In reply to jg from comment #18)
> "or you cannot provide us with more details "
>
> The other details are the Open Office files sitting on my system. The ones
> you aren't interested
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #18 from jg ---
"or you cannot provide us with more details "
The other details are the Open Office files sitting on my system. The ones you
aren't interested in. Are you new to this? Because you aren't
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #17 from Marcus ---
(In reply to jg from comment #15)
> Your problem is shortsightedness.
right, but my glasses are fixing my problem.
> Obviously the problem happened. You aren't concerned about the software that
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #16 from Keith N. McKenna ---
(In reply to jg from comment #13)
> Your program did it. Just saying it's not reproducible on your system is not
> a legitimate determination. It happens repeatedly on my system.
>
> Is
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #15 from jg ---
Your problem is shortsightedness. Obviously the problem happened. You aren't
concerned about the software that produced it. The software sitting here on my
system. Do you want one of YOUR films to
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #14 from Marcus ---
Sorry but as long as nobody can reproduce the reported problem we cannot
provide any help.
As I can understand your situation at the moment, I hope that you can
understand our position, too.
--
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #13 from jg ---
Your program did it. Just saying it's not reproducible on your system is not a
legitimate determination. It happens repeatedly on my system.
Is my system hacked?
The problem is obviously with
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
Keith N. McKenna changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Windows 10
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127440
Marcus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #11 from jg ---
And since ALL they hyperlinks disappear, it must relate to how they are stored,
some kind of data structure.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #10 from jg ---
And you can change it to "CONFIRMED" now. It's happened multiple times. And you
have the document right there. The doc shouldn't have blue underlined
hyperllinks with no addresses.
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #9 from jg ---
It's Windows 10.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
Keith N. McKenna changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||k...@apache.org
---
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #7 from jg ---
Created attachment 86144
--> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=86144=edit
original
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127440
Marcus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOT_AN_ISSUE
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127440
Issue ID: 127440
Issue Type: DEFECT
Summary: Run any componet fail under ARCANOAOS 5.0
Product: General
Version: 4.2.0-dev
Hardware: All
OS: OS/2
Status:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=36259
Marcus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
Marcus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|HYPERLINKS DISAPPEAR|Hyperlinks disappear after
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125006
--- Comment #18 from tldworks ---
I keep seeing reports of this problem that I also had continuously two years
ago after upgrading to 4.1. I reloaded 4.0.1 and have not had the problem since
but have avoided upgrading to later
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=36259
oooforum (fr) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ooofo...@free.fr
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127439
--- Comment #6 from oooforum (fr) ---
DOC is the result, we will need the root.
Provide ODT document.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121930
--- Comment #132 from John ---
Thank you.
hanya describes his analysis of the problem and the rationale for his script in
Comment 103 which I have copied below. (NB. hanya's reference to
registrymodifications.xcu is in
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121930
--- Comment #131 from Peter ---
Thank you John. This sounded differently on the mailing list.
So I thought maybe no actions are needed, but you have convinced me otherwise.
I agree with you. Adding the "Beta - Script" sounds
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121930
--- Comment #130 from John ---
(In reply to Peter from comment #129)
> I have checked with the community.
> The usual root case of spell checking stopped working is that users do not
> shut down their systems probably.
Peter
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121930
--- Comment #129 from Peter ---
I have checked with the community.
The usual root case of spell checking stopped working is that users do not shut
down their systems probably. I check now if we want to harden open office
against
28 matches
Mail list logo