ServoKvd commented on issue #2911: Proposal to to reorganize core/ and
root(openwhisk/) folders to reflect existing architecture better
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/2911#issuecomment-347839797
I guess Carol's main concern was with "sticking to ansible scripts"
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897872
@rabbah The failure of the wskdeploy build is from the deploy and
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897872
@rabbah The failure of the wskdeploy build is from the deploy and
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897872
@rabbah The failure of the wskdeploy build is from the deploy and
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897872
@rabbah The failure of the wskdeploy build is from the deploy and
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347901169
Also, if this is a client-side/user strategy for this failure that is
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #82: add configuration of Ingress
and restructure docs accordingly
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/82#discussion_r153826080
##
File path: kubernetes/nginx/README.md
##
@@ -96,6 +107,13 @@
rabbah closed pull request #82: add configuration of Ingress and restructure
docs accordingly
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/82
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the
rabbah commented on issue #3024: Action using dockerfile without going through
dockerhub
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3024#issuecomment-347908771
Related to
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/1362#issuecomment-337943114.
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347879836
wskdeploy travis build works fine before this commit.
When I pin the openwhisk version to this commit, the travis failed:
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897189
@rabbah enhancement to return behavior to its previous state?
rabbah commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897132
Re-titled and re-labelled accordingly.
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897872
@rabbah The failure of the wskdeploy build is from just the deploy
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347898984
@houshengbo in the meantime we likely need to disable all undeploys in
dgrove-oss commented on issue #92: Error when list action
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/92#issuecomment-347901042
Hi Terry, I will take a look today. We had some hiccups in the CI/CD
infrastructure so things are a little bit less stable than usual
rabbah commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347898952
This is a new feature - the client didn't observe this before because
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347886549
@houshengbo thanks for working to "pin" commits in our Travis to isolate
where this issue was introduced.
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347891412
@rabbah Jeremias indicated he saw this once after merge, but could not
recreate it.
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347891214
@houshengbo @rabbah so I was informed by Dave Grove that we discovered that
we were not publishing Docker images for perhaps 2
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347895825
@rabbah actually MS Azure adapts at the server (server-side API retry 3x) on
all APIs...
drcariel opened a new pull request #3025: allow open ansible to install catalog
dynamically
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3025
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897872
@rabbah The failure of the wskdeploy build is from just the deploy
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347895825
@rabbah actually MS Azure adapts at the server (server-side API retry 3x) on
all APIs... even with eventual consistency within
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347898984
@houshengbo in the meantime we likely need to disable all undeploys in
rabbah closed pull request #94: travis changes: use minikube and adjust sleep
times
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/94
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of
houshengbo commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347897872
@rabbah The failure of the wskdeploy build is from just the deploy
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #82: add configuration of Ingress
and restructure docs accordingly
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/pull/82#discussion_r153827604
##
File path: kubernetes/nginx/README.md
##
@@ -96,6 +107,13 @@
rabbah closed issue #2813: bug in invoker startup leads to too many stem cells?
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/2813
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347886171
@rabbah we are seeing "concurrency" errors when trying to "undeploy" or
delete resources. We have a series of integration tests
rabbah commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347887291
Kafka is not part of the CRUD operations. So I suspect it?s a red herring.
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347938756
@houshengbo @pritidesai
I am going to start removing failing
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347938756
@houshengbo @pritidesai
I am going to start removing failing
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347938756
@houshengbo @pritidesai
I am going to start removing failing
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347938756
@houshengbo @pritidesai
I am going to start removing failing
drcariel opened a new pull request #5: Test fix
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-deploy/pull/5
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347918157
this is causing deja vu for me, saw this in MS Azure ~6 years ago
rabbah opened a new issue #3026: WskRestPackageTests 409 conflict related test
failure
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3026
Failed in this
[build](https://travis-ci.org/apache/incubator-openwhisk/builds/308993351)
following couchd cluster enablement
rabbah commented on issue #3020: Docs: mac group_vars folder not exist,
document need update
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3020#issuecomment-347914003
Thanks for finding this - do you intend to submit a pr to correct the doc?
We welcome contributions.
dgrove-oss opened a new issue #100: Docs: update to suggest using minikube
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/100
we can run OpenWhisk in minikube now. Update
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347918157
this is causing deja vu for me, saw this in MS Azure ~6 years ago
mdeuser commented on issue #3019: WIP: Trigger activation reduction
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3019#issuecomment-347939806
had a chat with @jasonpet. apparently many of the provider tests rely on
the current behavior (i.e. fire trigger that has no rule, look
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347654572
and now on a different test...
```
=== RUN
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347938756
@houshengbo @pritidesai
I am going to start removing failing
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347938756
@houshengbo @pritidesai
I am going to start removing failing
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347938756
@houshengbo @pritidesai
I am going to start removing failing
Terry-Shi commented on issue #92: Error when list action
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/92#issuecomment-347733238
I suggest use specific version for the docker image in yaml file instead of
"latest".
I understand "latest" is a easy choice since
rabbah commented on issue #3021: Concurrency issue brought in by commit
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/commit/21d37a1af329544e245d376ad613d1a603fc104c
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347739416
Can you clarify and add some details
rabbah opened a new issue #3022: services.KafkaConnectorTests.Kafka heisenbug
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3022
Observed one failure in jenkins:
```bash
services.KafkaConnectorTests.Kafka connector should send and receive a kafka
message even after
rabbah commented on issue #2911: Proposal to to reorganize core/ and
root(openwhisk/) folders to reflect existing architecture better
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/2911#issuecomment-347739972
Seems wrong to put a backend/server side deployment in a client repo.
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #3019: WIP: Trigger activation
reduction
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3019#discussion_r153685127
##
File path: core/controller/src/main/scala/whisk/core/controller/Triggers.scala
##
@@ -143,71
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347918157
this is causing deja vu for me, saw this in MS Azure 7 years ago
rabbah commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-347920792
A point to reiterate here is that the CRUD operations are round robin
rabbah opened a new issue #3027: ActivationsApiTests fails with no results from
list query
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3027
Observed in couple of Travis PR builds.
```
whisk.core.controller.test.ActivationsApiTests > Activations API should get
drcariel opened a new pull request #3028: More explicit executable call for
Mac/Unix users
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3028
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
cbickel closed pull request #2810: Add couchdb clustering
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2810
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a foreign pull
starpit opened a new issue #89: socket hangup issues due to slow connection open
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/89
we inherit needle's default connection-open timeout of 10 seconds. this
seems to result in socket hangup errors. i'm not sure what the
jessealva commented on issue #45: WIP: Adding support for path parameters for
api gateway
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-go/pull/45#issuecomment-347663320
@mdeuser Any other comments?
This is
rabbah closed issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on concurrent
modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021
This is an automated message from
rabbah commented on issue #3032: HA controller leads to fail some tests
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3032#issuecomment-348059813
Thanks @devbv for the cross link - I think having a sticky session to route
CRUD operations to the same controller will help
jasonpet commented on a change in pull request #6: import correction
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-deploy/pull/6#discussion_r154141645
##
File path: tools/travis/build.sh
##
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
#!/bin/bash
+set -e
+
# Build script for
jasonpet commented on a change in pull request #84: make travis more efficient
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-pushnotifications/pull/84#discussion_r154146118
##
File path: tools/travis/build.sh
##
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
SCRIPTDIR=$(cd $(dirname
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-347679613
3rd and 4th attempt:
```
==> Executing: wskdeploy undeploy -p
drcariel opened a new pull request #84: make travis more efficient
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-pushnotifications/pull/84
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
mrutkows opened a new issue #660: Message indicates "Deployment completed
successfully" when actually it failed...
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/660
Recently we have seen errors on "undeploy" (due to concurrency issues) in
Travis. In several cases,
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-348228770
@houshengbo @pritidesai
Apparently, we are printing:
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-348264538
@rabbah thanks Rodric for your analysis and 3032 reference. Also, will
houshengbo opened a new pull request #661: Remove unnecessary rule changes
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/pull/661
A rule is enabled when it is created. There is no need to activate it.
A rule is able to delete no matter it is active or inactive. This PR
mhenke1 opened a new issue #3034: Loglevel should be configurable via ansible
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3034
The default log level is set to INFO level in logback.xml
To make local debugging easier this level should be adaptable for each
environment via
jasonpet commented on a change in pull request #6: import correction
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-deploy/pull/6#discussion_r154131314
##
File path: tools/travis/build.sh
##
@@ -43,11 +46,11 @@ WSK_CLI=$WHISKDIR/bin/wsk
AUTH_KEY=$(cat
abaruni closed pull request #120: Support trigger update for feed triggers
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-cli/pull/120
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this
devbv opened a new issue #3032: HA controller leads to fail some tests
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3032
Since Nginx does proxy in Round-Robin way, some tests which were designed to
run sequentially in one controller are failed.
Let me explain one
abaruni opened a new pull request #120: Support trigger update for feed triggers
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-cli/pull/120
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
akrabat opened a new pull request #5: Fix mistakes in README
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/5
A couple of missed substitutions?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
rabbah commented on issue #1815: Concurrent updates: race can easily result in
"silent squash" failures
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/1815#issuecomment-277845535
1-3 are all invasive. 4 is potentially lowest hanging fruit as we already
have a lockable entry in
abaruni commented on issue #120: Support trigger update for feed triggers
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-cli/pull/120#issuecomment-348244538
@jessealva will you take a look at this, please?
This is an
abaruni commented on issue #120: Support trigger update for feed triggers
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-cli/pull/120#issuecomment-348254998
@csantanapr can you have a look and merge?
This is an automated
mrutkows opened a new issue #659: Add flag to suppress Warnings -warning false
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/659
my wish to "de-clutter" Travis build logs where we repeatedly report
warnings pulling API keys from "whisk.properties"...
```
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-348264538
@rabbah thanks Rodric for your analysis and 3032 reference
jasonpet commented on a change in pull request #84: make travis more efficient
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-pushnotifications/pull/84#discussion_r154157426
##
File path: .travis.yml
##
@@ -18,10 +18,7 @@ notifications:
install: true
dgrove-oss commented on issue #99: Enable pod/node affinity/anti-affinity in
the deployment
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/99#issuecomment-348244815
This makes sense. We will pick up some of these deployment policies when we
merge the daemon set
jasonpet commented on a change in pull request #84: make travis more efficient
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-pushnotifications/pull/84#discussion_r154146118
##
File path: tools/travis/build.sh
##
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
SCRIPTDIR=$(cd $(dirname
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-348228590
So... with the first 3 int. tests commented out above, we had 2
mrutkows commented on issue #3021: Consider automatic server-side retry on
concurrent modification of assets during CRUD operations
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3021#issuecomment-348264538
@rabbah thanks Rodric for your analysis and 3032 reference. Also, will
mrutkows commented on issue #651: Concurrency error: Error code: 153:
Concurrent modification to resource detected. (code 379)
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy/issues/651#issuecomment-348255470
Retry approach being address here in PR
style95 commented on issue #3029: couchdb clustering not working
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3029#issuecomment-348065868
@csantanapr Are you using dns name in db section of `hosts` file?
This is
style95 commented on issue #3029: couchdb clustering not working
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3029#issuecomment-348073217
I have discussed with @csantanapr.
Actually there is limitation in #2810.
With that change, we can't setup multiple couchdb nodes
style95 commented on issue #3029: couchdb clustering not working
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/3029#issuecomment-348073217
I have discussed with @csantanapr.
Actually there is limitation in #2810.
With that change, we can't setup multiple couchdb nodes
csantanapr closed pull request #3030: attempt to fix couchdb clustering
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3030
This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:
As this is a
csantanapr commented on issue #3030: attempt to fix couchdb clustering
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3030#issuecomment-348072256
Discussed with @style95 and couchdb clustering is not possible in single
machine
joelmarty commented on issue #2237: web action should not return 200 status on
action error
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/issues/2237#issuecomment-348113404
I can report my experience rather than make a suggestion:
I have a function, very simple, that returns a
jeremiaswerner opened a new pull request #3033: add some logs statements to the
test to hunt heisenbug #3022
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/3033
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
mhenke1 commented on a change in pull request #2990: Change log level
dynamically
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2990#discussion_r154031014
##
File path: common/scala/src/main/scala/whisk/common/Logging.scala
##
@@ -37,7 +37,11 @@ trait Logging {
abaruni commented on a change in pull request #229: verify trigger fire
responds with any successful status code
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-kafka/pull/229#discussion_r154183037
##
File path: provider/consumer.py
##
@@ -353,8 +353,12 @@ def
abaruni opened a new pull request #229: verify trigger fire responds with any
successful status code
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-package-kafka/pull/229
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #2832: Do not cache invalidate
when adding a DB attachment
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2832#discussion_r153965476
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/whisk/core/database/DocumentFactory.scala
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #2832: Do not cache invalidate
when adding a DB attachment
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2832#discussion_r153964961
##
File path:
common/scala/src/main/scala/whisk/core/database/DocumentFactory.scala
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #2832: Do not cache invalidate
when adding a DB attachment
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/2832#discussion_r153965091
##
File path: common/scala/src/main/scala/whisk/core/entity/WhiskAction.scala
##
@@
mrutkows commented on a change in pull request #46: Add retry support to every
request
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-go/pull/46#discussion_r154175005
##
File path: whisk/client.go
##
@@ -316,98 +319,118 @@ func BodyTruncator(body
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #46: Add retry support to every
request
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-go/pull/46#discussion_r154176550
##
File path: whisk/client.go
##
@@ -316,98 +319,118 @@ func BodyTruncator(body io.ReadCloser)
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #46: Add retry support to every
request
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-go/pull/46#discussion_r154176550
##
File path: whisk/client.go
##
@@ -316,98 +319,118 @@ func BodyTruncator(body io.ReadCloser)
701 - 800 of 28307 matches
Mail list logo
