[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16927335#comment-16927335
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-1925:
I rescheduled this issue to 0.13.0.
> Improve hive compatibil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1925:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Improve hive compatibil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-2187.
Resolution: Fixed
> Update KEY file and signatures of release artifa
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1055
+1
The patch looks good to me.
---
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1053
Thank you for your quick review.
---
Github user hyunsik closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1053
---
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1053
I already pushed this change to our web when I submitted this patch. But,
this change haven't been committed to our git repository.
---
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1054
Hi @jinossy,
LGTM +1
The patch looks straightforward.
---
GitHub user hyunsik opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1053
TAJO-2187: Update KEY file and signatures of release artifacts
This patch updates the signatures of download page.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user hyunsik closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1051
---
Hyunsik Choi created TAJO-2187:
--
Summary: Update KEY file and signatures of release artifacts
Key: TAJO-2187
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2187
Project: Tajo
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16343200#comment-16343200
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-1925:
I've assigned this issue to me. I'll continue to do this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi reassigned TAJO-1925:
--
Assignee: Hyunsik Choi (was: Jaehwa Jung)
> Improve hive compatibility with TIMEST
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1051
FYI, as Dongjin said, tajo-daemon.sh is an actual script to be executed at
each node. tajo-daemons is a script to call iteratively a given command in all
remote nodes.
---
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1050
+1 Ship it. The patch looks straightforward.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-2184.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 0.12.0
committed. Thank you for your contribution.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi reassigned TAJO-2184:
--
Assignee: Lee Dongjin
> Can not run Tajo with non-default $TAJO_CONF_
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1718:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Refine code for Parquet 1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-2185.
Resolution: Fixed
committed.
> Eliminate protoc binary depende
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16276279#comment-16276279
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-2186:
[~jhkim] Thank you for taking this issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi reopened TAJO-1952:
> Implement PartitionFileFragment
> ---
>
> Ke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-1952.
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Implement PartitionFileFragm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2132:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Implement Index operator to acc
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/853
Hi @blrunner,
It has been long time. IMO, This patch needs to be included in 0.12.0
release. If you are Ok, could your rebase it? Otherwise, I can do it.
---
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052
Thanks. I'll merge it.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-1938.
Resolution: Fixed
Done
> (Umbrella) Make APIs to be more Java 8 Stream frien
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16276186#comment-16276186
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-1945:
rescheduled it to 0.13.0 because it didn't have enough progress
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1945:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Implement ApplicationMaster for Tajo Y
Github user hyunsik closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/874
---
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/874
Close this issue because most of improvements are already included in
TAJO-2108.
---
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052#discussion_r154543606
--- Diff: tajo-core/pom.xml ---
@@ -93,33 +93,29 @@
-org.codehaus.mojo
-exec-maven-plugin
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052
@jihoonson Thanks for your quick review. I reflected your comments.
---
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052#discussion_r154542285
--- Diff: tajo-storage/tajo-storage-hbase/pom.xml ---
@@ -112,26 +112,28 @@
-org.codehaus.mojo
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052#discussion_r154542268
--- Diff: tajo-core/pom.xml ---
@@ -93,33 +93,29 @@
-org.codehaus.mojo
-exec-maven-plugin
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052#discussion_r154542177
--- Diff: tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-common/pom.xml ---
@@ -75,25 +75,27 @@
-org.codehaus.mojo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16276166#comment-16276166
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-1840:
Thank you for your work. I fixed it as resolved. It seems done
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1704:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Apply ComparableTuple to *AggregateE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-1840.
Resolution: Fixed
> Code migration for JDK 7
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16276161#comment-16276161
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-1905:
I rescheduled it to 0.13.0 because it seems not critical in main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1905:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Insert clause to partitioned table fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1363?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1363:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Nested record support in Avro Appen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1402:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> EvalNode should have TypeDesc inst
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-982:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Improve Fetcher to get multiple shuf
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-982?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16276160#comment-16276160
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-982:
---
I rescheduled it to 0.13.0 because it didn't start yet.
> Impr
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052
I found a new bug filed at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2186.
IMO, It seems not critical. So, I temporarily fixed this unit test issue.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2186:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> TestResultSet.testDateTimeType fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16276109#comment-16276109
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-2186:
Please see some part of testDateTimeType test
{code:title
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2186:
---
Environment: Linux, Mac OS X (was: export TZ=UTC)
> TestResultSet.testDateTimeType fails in
Hyunsik Choi created TAJO-2186:
--
Summary: TestResultSet.testDateTimeType fails in UTC timezone
Key: TAJO-2186
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2186
Project: Tajo
Issue Type: Bug
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052
There was travis build error because of the changed travis environment.
Travis seems to use busybox where ulimit is not an external command. So, I
changed travis.yml file too.
---
GitHub user hyunsik opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1052
[TAJO-2185] Eliminate protoc binary dependency
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2185.
Building Tajo project depends on protoc binary installed on a local
machine. It is very
Hyunsik Choi created TAJO-2185:
--
Summary: Eliminate protoc binary dependency
Key: TAJO-2185
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2185
Project: Tajo
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1876:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> TaskImpl potentially may miss s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1996:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Too many index lookups during ra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1375:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.12.0)
0.13.0
> Staging directory should be removed w
Github user hyunsik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1040
+1 LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2165:
---
Summary: Add 'ALTER TABLE UNSET PROPERTY' statement to Tajo DDL (was: Add
'UNSET' statement to Tajo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2163:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.12.0
> No error message is showed when query execution fai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2163:
---
Assignee: Wonjun Hong
> No error message is showed when query execution fai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15297692#comment-15297692
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-2162:
Which JVM version do you use for Tajo cluster?
> Internal er
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15297605#comment-15297605
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-2162:
Thank you for sharing.
> Internal error is occured while runn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2162:
---
Fix Version/s: 0.11.4
> Internal error is occured while running query including 'or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15297594#comment-15297594
]
Hyunsik Choi commented on TAJO-2162:
Thank you for your report. Could you share your hadoop version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2162:
---
Description:
master log:
ERROR org.apache.tajo.master.QueryInProgress: q_1464008676790_0012 is stopped
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017#issuecomment-220865812
Thank you very much. I'll commit it soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017#issuecomment-220824035
fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#issuecomment-220732160
See http://tajo.apache.org/docs/devel/functions/hivefunc.html
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#issuecomment-220732091
I also updated the documentation. But, I missed 'close' tag in the commit
log. Could you close this ticket?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-2027.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.11.0)
0.12.0
committed
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017#issuecomment-220729545
thank you for your review. I fixed them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#issuecomment-220729472
+1 the patch looks good to me. I'll commit it soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#discussion_r64113791
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/functions/hivefunc.rst ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+##
+Hive Functions
+##
+
+Tajo
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017#discussion_r64004326
--- Diff: tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/type/Bit.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017#discussion_r63986923
--- Diff: tajo-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/type/Type.java ---
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
// No paramter types
public static final Any Any
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017#issuecomment-220191548
rebased. Thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/990#issuecomment-219886726
Could you explain the purpose of this patch?
See setDatabase() in the below. The variable 'database' already contains
'mapped_dbname'.
```
public
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#discussion_r63620568
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/functions/hivefunc.rst ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+##
+Hive Functions
+##
+
+Tajo
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#discussion_r63620353
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/functions/hivefunc.rst ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+##
+Hive Functions
+##
+
+Tajo
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#discussion_r63620183
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/functions/hivefunc.rst ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+##
+Hive Functions
+##
+
+Tajo
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1025#issuecomment-219880467
+1 LGTM! Ship it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/942#issuecomment-219878431
could you rebase it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/996#issuecomment-219878172
@jihoonson In this issue or in another issue?
@blrunner It seems to need rebase again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1015#issuecomment-219865160
+1
The patch looks good to me. It's a nice cleanup for the fragment and its
related ones. I left a trivial comment. If you agree, you can commit after
reflecting
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1015#discussion_r63609934
--- Diff:
tajo-storage/tajo-storage-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/storage/fragment/FragmentSerdeHelper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,54
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi resolved TAJO-2157.
Resolution: Fixed
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1018
committed.
> EvalNodeSeriali
GitHub user hyunsik opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1018
TAJO-2157: EvalNodeSerializer/Deserializer should use new Type
implementation.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/hyunsik/tajo
Hyunsik Choi created TAJO-2157:
--
Summary: EvalNodeSerializer/Deserializer should use new Type
implementation.
Key: TAJO-2157
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2157
Project: Tajo
GitHub user hyunsik opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1017
TAJO-2154: Refactor Datum to use new Type implementation.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/hyunsik/tajo TAJO-2154
Alternatively
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1007#issuecomment-219191558
It seems to need to rebase.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Hyunsik Choi created TAJO-2154:
--
Summary: Refactor Datum to use new Type implementation
Key: TAJO-2154
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2154
Project: Tajo
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2129?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2129:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: New Feature)
> Apply new type implementation to Schema and Cata
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1016#issuecomment-218951883
I reflected your comments. Thank you for the comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1016#discussion_r63133371
--- Diff:
tajo-algebra/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/algebra/DataTypeExpr.java ---
@@ -59,15 +68,34 @@ public String getTypeName
Github user hyunsik commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1016#issuecomment-218950443
Sure, I jut added ```@deprecated``` to SchemaLegacy and Column classes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1016#discussion_r63132708
--- Diff:
tajo-core-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/eval/TestEvalTree.java ---
@@ -385,4 +384,34 @@ private void assertCloneEqual(EvalNode eval
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1016#discussion_r63132603
--- Diff:
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/statistics/TableStats.java
---
@@ -85,13 +88,17 @@ public TableStats
Github user hyunsik commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1016#discussion_r63132236
--- Diff:
tajo-algebra/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/algebra/ColumnDefinition.java ---
@@ -51,6 +46,11 @@ public ColumnDefinition(String columnName
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2149:
---
Description: JsonLineDeserializer/JsonLineSerializer should support array
type. (was: JSON scanner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-2149:
---
Summary: Array type support in JSON format (was: Array support in JSON
format)
> Array type supp
Hyunsik Choi created TAJO-2149:
--
Summary: Array support in JSON format
Key: TAJO-2149
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-2149
Project: Tajo
Issue Type: Sub-task
1 - 100 of 3372 matches
Mail list logo
