[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1890) Add note to docs that ReadFields annotations are currently not evaluated

2017-06-21 Thread Neelesh Srinivas Salian (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16058219#comment-16058219
 ] 

Neelesh Srinivas Salian commented on FLINK-1890:


[~fhueske], i can pick it up.

> Add note to docs that ReadFields annotations are currently not evaluated
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-1890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1890
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Wish
>  Components: DataSet API
>Reporter: Stefan Bunk
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: starter
>
> In the Scala API, you have the option to declare forwarded fields via the
> {{withForwardedFields}} method.
> It would be nice to have sth. similar for read fields, as otherwise one needs 
> to create a class, which I personally try to avoid for readability.
> Maybe grouping all annotations in one function and have a first parameter 
> indicating the type of annotation is also an option, if you plan on adding 
> more annotations and want to keep the interface smaller.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1890) Add note to docs that ReadFields annotations are currently not evaluated

2016-10-13 Thread Fabian Hueske (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15572810#comment-15572810
 ] 

Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-1890:
--

I'd keep the issue open. I'll add the starter tag to it. Maybe somebody picks 
it up.

> Add note to docs that ReadFields annotations are currently not evaluated
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-1890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1890
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Wish
>  Components: DataSet API
>Reporter: Stefan Bunk
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: starter
>
> In the Scala API, you have the option to declare forwarded fields via the
> {{withForwardedFields}} method.
> It would be nice to have sth. similar for read fields, as otherwise one needs 
> to create a class, which I personally try to avoid for readability.
> Maybe grouping all annotations in one function and have a first parameter 
> indicating the type of annotation is also an option, if you plan on adding 
> more annotations and want to keep the interface smaller.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-1890) Add note to docs that ReadFields annotations are currently not evaluated

2016-10-13 Thread Greg Hogan (JIRA) 

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15572633#comment-15572633
 ] 

Greg Hogan commented on FLINK-1890:
---

Do we still want this documented or can we close this issue?

> Add note to docs that ReadFields annotations are currently not evaluated
> 
>
> Key: FLINK-1890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1890
> Project: Flink
>  Issue Type: Wish
>  Components: DataSet API
>Reporter: Stefan Bunk
>Priority: Minor
>
> In the Scala API, you have the option to declare forwarded fields via the
> {{withForwardedFields}} method.
> It would be nice to have sth. similar for read fields, as otherwise one needs 
> to create a class, which I personally try to avoid for readability.
> Maybe grouping all annotations in one function and have a first parameter 
> indicating the type of annotation is also an option, if you plan on adding 
> more annotations and want to keep the interface smaller.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)