[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18375) The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are deallocated while in pool because there is no reference to them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129978#comment-16129978 ] Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-18375: - What do you think ? :) > The pool chunks from

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129983#comment-16129983 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-18471: IMHO the first peek() that happens after

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18375) The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are deallocated while in pool because there is no reference to them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129987#comment-16129987 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-18375: I think we should add some Findbug Tags

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129985#comment-16129985 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-18471: [~chia7712] - Am just seeing your

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129998#comment-16129998 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-17617: Sorry for my lazy commit..:( > Backport HBASE-16731

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130008#comment-16130008 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18471: bq. the delete marker should always be read before any

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18375) The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are deallocated while in pool because there is no reference to them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anastasia Braginsky updated HBASE-18375: Attachment: HBASE-18375-V10.patch > The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129975#comment-16129975 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18471: bq. why a normal kv with empty column sorted before

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18375) The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are deallocated while in pool because there is no reference to them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129977#comment-16129977 ] Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-18375: - I saw the findbug. It is about volatile field

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pankaj Kumar updated HBASE-17617: - Comment: was deleted (was: ok...) > Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129991#comment-16129991 ] Pankaj Kumar commented on HBASE-17617: -- ok... > Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129992#comment-16129992 ] Pankaj Kumar commented on HBASE-17617: -- ok... > Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129992#comment-16129992 ] Pankaj Kumar edited comment on HBASE-17617 at 8/17/17 6:18 AM: --- ok...Raised

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130006#comment-16130006 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18471: bq. I really don't know if there is a better way to work

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Attachment: (was: FuzzyRowFilter_HBASE_18617.patch) > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Affects Version/s: 1.1.2 Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Attachment: FuzzyRowFilter_HBASE_18617.patch > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Attachment: FuzzyRowFilter_HBASE_18617.patch > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs >

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-18618) Backport HBASE-16729 (Define the behavior of (default) empty FilterList) to branch-1

Pankaj Kumar created HBASE-18618: Summary: Backport HBASE-16729 (Define the behavior of (default) empty FilterList) to branch-1 Key: HBASE-18618 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18618

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16129990#comment-16129990 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-18471: {quote} We compare the TS first, so normal kv with empty column

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130006#comment-16130006 ] Chia-Ping Tsai edited comment on HBASE-18471 at 8/17/17 6:36 AM: - bq. I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130009#comment-16130009 ] ramkrishna.s.vasudevan commented on HBASE-18471: IMHO in an ideal case there is always a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130072#comment-16130072 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18617: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18619) Should we add a postOpenDeployTasks after open splited or merged region?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130219#comment-16130219 ] Jingyun Tian commented on HBASE-18619: -- [~jxiang] pls check this out > Should we add a

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130241#comment-16130241 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18617: {quote} + Pair p = new Pair<>(); +

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-18619) Should we add a postOpenDeployTasks after open splited or merged region?

Jingyun Tian created HBASE-18619: Summary: Should we add a postOpenDeployTasks after open splited or merged region? Key: HBASE-18619 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18619 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18619) Should we add a postOpenDeployTasks after open splited or merged region?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jingyun Tian updated HBASE-18619: - Description: I have a question that why we skip postOpenDeployTasks() when we not using zk for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai updated HBASE-17617: --- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18375) The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are deallocated while in pool because there is no reference to them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130230#comment-16130230 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18375: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130233#comment-16130233 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-17617: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.3-JDK7 #239 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16731) Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130234#comment-16130234 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16731: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.3-JDK7 #239 (See

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai reassigned HBASE-18617: -- Assignee: vinisha > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130120#comment-16130120 ] Ted Yu commented on HBASE-18617: {code} 87if (p.getFirst().length != p.getSecond().length) {

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14498) Master stuck in infinite loop when all Zookeeper servers are unreachable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130134#comment-16130134 ] Pankaj Kumar commented on HBASE-14498: -- Attached the modified patch as .002. > Master stuck in

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18347) Implement a BufferedMutator for async client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-18347: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Implement a BufferedMutator for async client >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18347) Implement a BufferedMutator for async client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-18347: -- Attachment: HBASE-18347.patch Add a simple implementation. The most important thing here is to decide

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ted Yu updated HBASE-18617: --- Priority: Minor (was: Major) > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-14498) Master stuck in infinite loop when all Zookeeper servers are unreachable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pankaj Kumar updated HBASE-14498: - Attachment: HBASE-14498.master.002.patch > Master stuck in infinite loop when all Zookeeper

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pankaj Kumar updated HBASE-17617: - Attachment: HBASE-17617-branch-1-V2.patch HBASE-17617-branch-1.4-V2.patch

[jira] [Assigned] (HBASE-18347) Implement a BufferedMutator for async client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang reassigned HBASE-18347: - Assignee: Duo Zhang > Implement a BufferedMutator for async client >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18347) Implement a BufferedMutator for async client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-18347: -- Affects Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha-2 3.0.0 Fix Version/s: 2.0.0-alpha-3

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18448) Added support for refreshing HFiles through API and shell

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130322#comment-16130322 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18448: RefreshHFilesEndpoint is added in server module as in

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130246#comment-16130246 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-17617: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.2-JDK7 #196 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16731) Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130247#comment-16130247 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16731: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.2-JDK7 #196 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18471) The DeleteFamily cell is skipped when StoreScanner seeks to next column

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130260#comment-16130260 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18471: [~ram_krish] Thanks for the great case. Any more

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16731) Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130258#comment-16130258 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16731: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.3-IT #172 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130257#comment-16130257 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-17617: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.3-IT #172 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130293#comment-16130293 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-17617: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130255#comment-16130255 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-17617: SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.2-IT #932 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16731) Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130256#comment-16130256 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16731: SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.2-IT #932 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18546) Always overwrite the TS for Append/Increment unless no existing cells are found

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130278#comment-16130278 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18546: Ping for reviews~ > Always overwrite the TS for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18375) The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are deallocated while in pool because there is no reference to them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anastasia Braginsky updated HBASE-18375: Attachment: HBASE-18375-V11.patch > The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18375) The pool chunks from ChunkCreator are deallocated while in pool because there is no reference to them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130305#comment-16130305 ] Anastasia Braginsky commented on HBASE-18375: - Have added the findbug suppressing comment,

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10944) Remove all kv.getBuffer() and kv.getRow() references existing in the code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130324#comment-16130324 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-10944: Ya we no longer use KV directly in the code path. All

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18572) Delete#addColumn can't remove the cell which has no visibility label

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130333#comment-16130333 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18572: Seems all cases are handled now. +1. Thanks for the

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18347) Implement a BufferedMutator for async client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130341#comment-16130341 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18347: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16731) Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130348#comment-16130348 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16731: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.4 #867 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130347#comment-16130347 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-17617: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.4 #867 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16731) Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130353#comment-16130353 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-16731: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.5 #14 (See

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-17617) Backport HBASE-16731 (Inconsistent results from the Get/Scan if we use the empty FilterList) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-17617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130352#comment-16130352 ] Hudson commented on HBASE-17617: FAILURE: Integrated in Jenkins build HBase-1.5 #14 (See

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18572) Delete can't remove the cell which has no visibility label

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai updated HBASE-18572: --- Summary: Delete can't remove the cell which has no visibility label (was: Delete#addColumn

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18572) Delete can't remove the cells which have no visibility label

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16130356#comment-16130356 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18572: Will commit it tomorrow if no objections. > Delete

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18572) Delete can't remove the cells which have no visibility label

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chia-Ping Tsai updated HBASE-18572: --- Summary: Delete can't remove the cells which have no visibility label (was: Delete can't

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18503) Change ***Util and Master to use TableDescriptor and ColumnFamilyDescriptor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131244#comment-16131244 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18503: bq. I was pretty sure that always called the object form

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18601) Remove Htrace 3.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18601?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131242#comment-16131242 ] Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-18601: - Regardless of the outcome for HTrace in HBase, it sounds like

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131378#comment-16131378 ] vinisha commented on HBASE-18617: - The test is failing with: {noformat} Error Message expected: but was:

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131378#comment-16131378 ] vinisha edited comment on HBASE-18617 at 8/17/17 10:14 PM: --- The test is failing

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-16231) Integration tests should support client keytab login for secure clusters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Helmling updated HBASE-16231: -- Release Note: Prior to this change, the integration test clients (IntegrationTest*) relied on

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18503) Change ***Util and Master to use TableDescriptor and ColumnFamilyDescriptor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131248#comment-16131248 ] Mike Drob commented on HBASE-18503: --- Oh, I think I posed my question backwards, then! I know we have to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131369#comment-16131369 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18617: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-16231) Integration tests should support client keytab login for secure clusters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131373#comment-16131373 ] Sean Busbey commented on HBASE-16231: - Thanks for the release note Gary, that's great. It sounds

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-18623) Frequent failed to parse at EOF warnings from WALEntryStream

Andrew Purtell created HBASE-18623: -- Summary: Frequent failed to parse at EOF warnings from WALEntryStream Key: HBASE-18623 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18623 Project: HBase

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Attachment: (was: FuzzyRowFilter_HBASE_18617.patch) > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Attachment: (was: TestFuzzyRowFilterEndToEnd_HBASE_18617.patch) > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18503) Change ***Util and Master to use TableDescriptor and ColumnFamilyDescriptor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131279#comment-16131279 ] Chia-Ping Tsai commented on HBASE-18503: bq. Leads to possibility of somebody making a silly but

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18503) Change ***Util and Master to use TableDescriptor and ColumnFamilyDescriptor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131357#comment-16131357 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18503: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Comment: was deleted (was: The test is failing with: {noformat} Error Message expected: but was:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18503) Change ***Util and Master to use TableDescriptor and ColumnFamilyDescriptor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131422#comment-16131422 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18503: --- | (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote ||

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18490) Modifying a table descriptor to enable replicas does not create replica regions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131420#comment-16131420 ] huaxiang sun commented on HBASE-18490: -- Hi [~ram_krish], which version did you check? I ran this

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18615) hbase-rest tests fail in hbase-2.0.0-alpha2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131427#comment-16131427 ] stack commented on HBASE-18615: --- It looked like this:

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-11466) HConnectionImplementation should not use ZK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131348#comment-16131348 ] Mikhail Antonov commented on HBASE-11466: - At the moment there's no work going on here...So I

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18617) FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] vinisha updated HBASE-18617: Attachment: FuzzyRowFilter_HBASE_18617_1.patch > FuzzyRowKeyFilter should not modify the filter pairs >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-14498) Master stuck in infinite loop when all Zookeeper servers are unreachable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-14498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131323#comment-16131323 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-14498: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18614) Setting BUCKET_CACHE_COMBINED_KEY to false disables stats on RS UI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131570#comment-16131570 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18614: Patch LGTM. So how it works when there is only L1 LRU

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18298) RegionServerServices Interface cleanup for CP expose

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131586#comment-16131586 ] Anoop Sam John commented on HBASE-18298: [~stack] You ok with this extended Interface ( for

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18298) RegionServerServices Interface cleanup for CP expose

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131606#comment-16131606 ] stack commented on HBASE-18298: --- [~anoop.hbase] Let me look again. I don't like the RSSInternal thing. Let

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-18489) Expose scan cursor in RawScanResultConsumer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang resolved HBASE-18489. --- Resolution: Fixed Pushed the addendum to master and branch-2. > Expose scan cursor in

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18489) Expose scan cursor in RawScanResultConsumer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang updated HBASE-18489: -- Attachment: HBASE-18489-addendum.patch > Expose scan cursor in RawScanResultConsumer >

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18358) Backport HBASE-18099 'FlushSnapshotSubprocedure should wait for concurrent Region#flush() to finish' to branch-1.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated HBASE-18358: Component/s: snapshots > Backport HBASE-18099 'FlushSnapshotSubprocedure should wait for

[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-18099) FlushSnapshotSubprocedure should wait for concurrent Region#flush() to finish

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Busbey updated HBASE-18099: Component/s: snapshots > FlushSnapshotSubprocedure should wait for concurrent Region#flush() to

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-15284) Make TimeRange constructors IA.Private and remove unused TimeRange constructors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-15284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131591#comment-16131591 ] Appy commented on HBASE-15284: -- It's weird. All constructor in are already marked deprecated in 2.0+.

[jira] [Reopened] (HBASE-18489) Expose scan cursor in RawScanResultConsumer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Duo Zhang reopened HBASE-18489: --- Revert some unnecessary changes... > Expose scan cursor in RawScanResultConsumer >

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18233) We shouldn't wait for readlock in doMiniBatchMutation in case of deadlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131662#comment-16131662 ] Allan Yang commented on HBASE-18233: {quote} Allan Yang Got notice from the user who was having

[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-18233) We shouldn't wait for readlock in doMiniBatchMutation in case of deadlock

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131662#comment-16131662 ] Allan Yang edited comment on HBASE-18233 at 8/18/17 3:25 AM: - {quote} Allan

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18518) Remove jersey1* dependencies from project and jersey1* jars from lib dir

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18518?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131743#comment-16131743 ] stack commented on HBASE-18518: --- Hmm. So this makes the tests pass but when I run the REST server apart, I

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18619) Should we add a postOpenDeployTasks after open splited or merged region?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131601#comment-16131601 ] Jingyun Tian commented on HBASE-18619: -- [~apurtell] Could you pls check this out? > Should we add a

[jira] [Created] (HBASE-18624) Added support for clearing BlockCache

Ajay Jadhav created HBASE-18624: --- Summary: Added support for clearing BlockCache Key: HBASE-18624 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18624 Project: HBase Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-9417) SecureBulkLoadEndpoint should be folded in core

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-9417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jerry He resolved HBASE-9417. - Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0-alpha-3) > SecureBulkLoadEndpoint should be

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18615) hbase-rest tests fail in hbase-2.0.0-alpha2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131715#comment-16131715 ] Samir Ahmic commented on HBASE-18615: - [~stack] please take look at HBASE-18518 i was replacing

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18552) Backport the server side change in HBASE-18489 to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16131713#comment-16131713 ] Hadoop QA commented on HBASE-18552: --- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem

  1   2   3   4   >