[GitHub] trafficserver pull request #1623: Delete dead code
Github user zwoop closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1623 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] trafficserver pull request #1623: Delete dead code
Github user SolidWallOfCode commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1623#discussion_r109226190 --- Diff: proxy/logging/LogBuffer.cc --- @@ -112,14 +112,6 @@ LogBufferHeader::log_filename() return addr; } -/*- - LogBuffer::LogBuffer --- End diff -- I talked with @danobi about this and my view is a local comment should be minimal and the real meat in the Architecture section of the documentation. This commentary has obviously not been maintained and I don't see it being any different in the future. At least in the normal documentation there's some hope of it being updated. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] trafficserver pull request #1623: Delete dead code
Github user danobi commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1623#discussion_r109180096 --- Diff: proxy/logging/LogBuffer.cc --- @@ -112,14 +112,6 @@ LogBufferHeader::log_filename() return addr; } -/*- - LogBuffer::LogBuffer --- End diff -- IMO it wasn't saying anything informative or useful now that AbstractBuffer is gone. If I had to add a comment it would be about what LogBuffer does and I would prefer to do that in LogBuffer.h. I'm deep into the weeds of the logging system right now. Afterwards, I'll fix up and add more documentation. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] trafficserver pull request #1623: Delete dead code
Github user zwoop commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1623#discussion_r109090078 --- Diff: proxy/logging/LogBuffer.cc --- @@ -112,14 +112,6 @@ LogBufferHeader::log_filename() return addr; } -/*- - LogBuffer::LogBuffer --- End diff -- I don't think you should nuke the entire comment, just clean it up. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] trafficserver pull request #1623: Delete dead code
GitHub user danobi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1623 Delete dead code None of this code was being called or used elsewhere. Most likely some point before git history someone migrated off the abstract base class and never bothered to delete this stuff. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/danobi/trafficserver delete_abstract_buffer Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/pull/1623.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1623 commit 7241221cf3a73729786540c04fcb3fe7805d05ea Author: Daniel XuDate: 2017-03-30T22:28:34Z Delete dead code None of this code was being called or used elsewhere. Most likely some point before git history someone migrated off the abstract base class and never bothered to delete this stuff. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---