On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 03:16:33PM +0200, Fred Vos wrote:
> I'm experimenting with mbsync for my Google Mail account now.
>
this came up on this list just recently.
the google extensions need explicit support, which mbsync doesn't have.
i might do that as the next thing, but no promises - it will
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 02:20:27PM +, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> The branch 'async', previously at 2ef915e, has been rewound by 43
> revision(s) and subsequently fast-forwarded by 46 revision(s) to
> 780edb7.
>
this is pretty good now - no "funny" effects any more. i'm trusting it
my producti
The branch 'async', previously at 2ef915e, has been rewound by 43
revision(s) and subsequently fast-forwarded by 46 revision(s) to
780edb7.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways t
Hello,
I've been using offlineimap now for years. On one computer,
offlineimap always has had issues with consuming 100% CPU every now
and then. That's a hardware issue with Python. Recently offlineimap
cannot recover from suspend to RAM on any machine, and I've lost some
messages. Therefore I'm e
