Evgeniy Berdnikov writes:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:00:17PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> What I just noticed is that the authenticate string that isync is
>> sending to dovecot:
>>
>> ZXJpY0BwYXBlci1yZXB1YmxpYy5vcmcAZXJpYwBQUndvcms=
>>
>> Which is being rejected, is the correct string *m
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:00:17PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> What I just noticed is that the authenticate string that isync is
> sending to dovecot:
>
> ZXJpY0BwYXBlci1yZXB1YmxpYy5vcmcAZXJpYwBQUndvcms=
>
> Which is being rejected, is the correct string *minus* the null
> characters. Ie isyn
Evgeniy Berdnikov writes:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 05:26:57PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>
>> Before I go pester someone else, my last question:
>>
>> For this example account, the AUTHENTICATE string should, as I
>> understand it, be derivable like this:
>>
>> $ pas=$(echo -en "\0e...@pa
Evgeniy Berdnikov writes:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 05:26:57PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>
>> Before I go pester someone else, my last question:
>>
>> For this example account, the AUTHENTICATE string should, as I
>> understand it, be derivable like this:
>>
>> $ pas=$(echo -en "\0e...@pa
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 05:26:57PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>
> Before I go pester someone else, my last question:
>
> For this example account, the AUTHENTICATE string should, as I
> understand it, be derivable like this:
>
> $ pas=$(echo -en "\[email protected]\0ThisIsMyPassword" |
Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:07:15PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> I set AuthMech to LOGIN, and mbsync connected, but then got a
>> UIDVALIDITY error for each mailbox.
>>
> this is seriously weird. the UIDVALIDITY can only change due to some
> server-side event. mayb
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 04:07:15PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I set AuthMech to LOGIN, and mbsync connected, but then got a
> UIDVALIDITY error for each mailbox.
>
this is seriously weird. the UIDVALIDITY can only change due to some
server-side event. maybe it is somehow bound to the configura
Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:04:50PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> I don't care that much about security on my local machine, so I'm using
>> the PLAIN auth mechanism. This worked fine until today's update.
>>
> well, no. it didn't, because isync didn't support PLAIN
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:04:50PM +0800, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> I don't care that much about security on my local machine, so I'm using
> the PLAIN auth mechanism. This worked fine until today's update.
>
well, no. it didn't, because isync didn't support PLAIN until now - it
used the legacy LOGI
