On Sun, Nov 16, 2025 at 07:12:20PM +, synflower--- via isync-devel wrote:
> Is the MaxMessages code so buggy or poorly tested
> that it's necessary, though?
When you're going to use a tool which is not designed for your task,
you take on a role of tester.
--
Eugene Berdnikov
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 12:33:32PM +0100, Philippe Bruhat (BooK) wrote:
isync's purpose is to keep both sides in sync. MaxMessages is a deviation
from that. when you push that number down to zero, that's _literally_
extreme, and you've gone from syncing to fetching.
Can't the requested workflow
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
What is so extreme about what I am doing?
isync's purpose is to keep both sides in sync. MaxMessages is a
deviation from that. when you push that number down to zero, that's
_literally_ extreme, and you've gon
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 10:05:09AM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 08:31:55AM +, [email protected] wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via
> > isync-devel wrote:
> > > shoehorning isync into doing something i
On Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 08:31:55AM +, [email protected] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
shoehorning isync into doing something it was not designed for
What is so extreme about what I am doing?
isync's purpose is to keep bot
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
shoehorning isync into doing something it was
not designed for
What is so extreme about what I am doing? Why is this such a difficult
task for isync?
___
isync-deve
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:15:55PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
why are you insisting on shoehorning isync into doing something it was
not designed for?
For one, I've been using isync for years and I have a lot of different
systems set up using it. Isync works great and I k
On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:27:01AM +, [email protected] wrote:
I tested it and it works. For data protection reasons, it would be very
useful if it was possible to set
MaxMessage 0
and have this result in zero messages being left on the server.
why are you insisting on shoehorn
On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 01:46:42PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 11:36:56AM +, [email protected] wrote:
If I configure
MaxMessages 1
ExpireUnread yes
ExpireSide Far
that will result in all emails staying locally archiv
On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 09:43:31PM +, synflower--- via isync-devel wrote:
Therefore I need to find a way to achieve POP3-like pull-and-delete
functionality on a server that only supports IMAP.
we have at least one known user who achieves something to that effect by
using MaxMessages coupled
On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 11:36:56AM +, [email protected] wrote:
If I configure
MaxMessages 1
ExpireUnread yes
ExpireSide Far
that will result in all emails staying locally archived, but only the
most recent message remaining on the server? (excluding flagged
messa
On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 01:46:42PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 11:36:56AM +, [email protected] wrote:
If I configure
MaxMessages 1
ExpireUnread yes
ExpireSide Far
that will result in all emails staying locally archiv
we have at least one known user who achieves something to that effect
by using MaxMessages coupled with "ExpireSide Far".
If I configure
MaxMessages 1
ExpireUnread yes
ExpireSide Far
that will result in all emails staying locally archived, but only the
most recent message
13 matches
Mail list logo
