Thanks for the confirmation Oswald. I can now use mbsync with a local
file system. I might be on the outer fringes with a very nfs intensive
environment. Some of our nfs is managed by administrators outside of my
control leaving me no alternative but the local file system.
I will try mbsync no
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 09:29:21AM -0400, John Eismeier wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> > is your home by any chance on nfs?
>
> Yes, is that the cause of the issue?
>
yes
> Should I use a local file system for mbsync ?
>
as a workaround, yes.
you can also mount the volume with -o local_lo
Yes, is that the cause of the issue? Should I use a local file system
for mbsync ?
Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 07:54:34PM -0400, John Eismeier wrote:
>> open("/home/eismej/email/mbsyncmail/INBOX/.uidvalidity", O_RDWR) = 4
>> flock(4, LOCK_EX) = 0
>
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 07:54:34PM -0400, John Eismeier wrote:
> open("/home/eismej/email/mbsyncmail/INBOX/.uidvalidity", O_RDWR) = 4
> flock(4, LOCK_EX) = 0
> fcntl(4, F_SETLKW, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0, len=0}
>
is your home by any chance on nfs?
---
understood the strace request Reimar, I just wanted to sanitize the
IP/password details before sending. I hope the details below will help
resolve where I am stuck ?
Thank you.
-- John
strace mbsync -a
execve("/usr/local/bin/mbsync", ["mbsync", "-a"], [/* 40 vars */]) = 0
brk(0)
On 18.09.2015, at 15:00, John Eismeier wrote:
> eismej@eismej-u14:~$ sudo strace -p 28132
> Process 28132 attached
> fcntl(4, F_SETLKW, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0, len=0} C-c
> C-cProcess 28132 detached
He meant running "strace mbsync -a" instead of attaching it afterwards.
Note th
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:00:53AM -0400, John Eismeier wrote:
> Is this enough detail to show only one mbsync in the background on the
> fcntl call that is stuck ???
>
yes
> eismej@eismej-u14:~$ mbsync -a
> C: 0/1 B: 0/44 M: +0/0 *0/0 #0/0 S: +0/0 *0/0 #0/0 C-c C-z
> [1]+ Stopped
Op 18-09-15 om 12:53 schreef Oswald Buddenhagen:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:20:13PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> I had to use something like this before it worked on a Cyrus IMAP server
>> (both of my servers are Cyrus IMAP):
>>
>>
>> Channel transfer
>> Master :originalstore:INBOX
>>
Thank you Oswald,
Is this enough detail to show only one mbsync in the background on the
fcntl call that is stuck ???
eismej@eismej-u14:~$ mbsync -a
C: 0/1 B: 0/44 M: +0/0 *0/0 #0/0 S: +0/0 *0/0 #0/0 C-c C-z
[1]+ Stopped mbsync -a
eismej@eismej-u14:~$ bg
eismej@eismej-u14:
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 02:55:46PM -0400, John Eismeier wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response Oswald. I did not find any additional
> mbsync in the background. How would I be able to demonstrate that ?
>
ps fux
> Does the config (.mbsyncrc) look OK? The connection does list the MS
> exchange
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:20:13PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> I had to use something like this before it worked on a Cyrus IMAP server
> (both of my servers are Cyrus IMAP):
>
>
> Channel transfer
> Master :originalstore:INBOX
> Slave :targetstore:INBOX
> Patterns *
> Create Slave
> Sy
Op 17-09-15 om 20:55 schreef John Eismeier:
>
> Thanks for your quick response Oswald. I did not find any additional
> mbsync in the background. How would I be able to demonstrate that ?
>
> Does the config (.mbsyncrc) look OK? The connection does list the MS
> exchange boxes/folders without i
Thanks for your quick response Oswald. I did not find any additional
mbsync in the background. How would I be able to demonstrate that ?
Does the config (.mbsyncrc) look OK? The connection does list the MS
exchange boxes/folders without issue ???
Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> On Thu, Sep 17,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:13:53AM -0400, John Eismeier wrote:
> fcntl(4, F_SETLKW, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0, len=0}
>
that isn't helpful without context (knowing what fd 4 belongs to).
my best bet is that you have a hanging mbsync process somewhere in the
background.
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
