Oswald, thanks for the detailed reply!
Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> i think the overall best configuration is one with a "shadow" imap
> server: an mbsync channel (partially) syncs the upstream with the
> shadow, while the clients then sync only with the shadow. whether the
> shadow runs on one of
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:42:01PM +0200, Christoph Groth wrote:
> This would give a triangular topology where both client1 and
> client2 sync with the server, and client1 syncs with client2. Is
> this a bad idea? If client1 and client2 both receive new mail
> from the server, and then sync be
Hello,
I have two machines (clients) that I sync with a central IMAP
server. Now I'd like to have some folders that are only present
on the clients and not on the server. I could setup mbsync to
sync directly between the two clients.
This would give a triangular topology where both client1
