Re: mbsync ignores --dry-run

2025-03-26 Thread inwit
Update: it appears that the command line --pull flag is also ignored. :( ___ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel

mbsync ignores --dry-run

2025-03-26 Thread inwit
Hi, I'm observing a disturbing behaviour of mbsync, both in v1.5.0 and in v1.5.1. When I add the --dry-run flag, mbsync ignores it and does alter my mailboxes, both far and near. I've asked a colleague to try and they've confirmed this. I think this might be an important bug, with potentially h

Re: mbsync ignores --dry-run

2025-03-26 Thread inwit
On 26/03/2025, 11:49, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel wrote: > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 11:08:26AM +0100, inwit wrote: >>I'm observing a disturbing behaviour of mbsync, both in v1.5.0 and in >>v1.5.1. When I add the --dry-run flag, mbsync ignores it and does alter >>

Re: mbsync ignores --dry-run

2025-03-26 Thread inwit
On 26/03/2025, 12:30, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel wrote: > yes, due to the re-consolidation of the output format, there is now no > distinction between "would" and "did" in the output, as it's just > numbers. Understood. They're just numbers but there's no distinction between "would" and

Re: mbsync ignores --dry-run

2025-03-26 Thread inwit
On 26/03/2025, 12:45, Oswald Buddenhagen via isync-devel wrote: > i suppose i could have it print "dry run; no modifications will be > made." at the start. That'd be clearer, yes. ___ isync-devel mailing list isync-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://li