Michael,
After I make the change, add the image, the digital signature says
it's invalid, so it's ok with the principles you listed. And says it's
invalid beacause of content change. I can handle that and it's ok
really. What I wanted is that the info of the original signature was
not lost or said
last version. I think is wrong, but they
probably have their reasons whatever they be. Maybe if they were just
as radical as I thought they were adobe would think is ok, who knows.
2009/4/16 rui fernandes :
> Ok Michael. For you to know, I saw it happened still in v9 It's
> not on
Ok Michael. For you to know, I saw it happened still in v9 It's
not on my project, but another one. They are more radical than me,
it's not just an image added, is a page replaced with a scaled image
of the original page, and an image added bellow. Then they end up
still on same issue even with
als Adobe softened its checks. Would it be
> possible for you to provide a sample document, maybe even sample code?
>
> Regards, Michael.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: rui fernandes [mailto:rjmfernan...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 3:26 PM
> To:
Ok Michael,
About the PDFStamper append mode, of course I do that. That's why it
works when I add the image to a different/new page at the end of the
document.
But the happy truth is that I just checked with the new version of
adobe reader 9, the same document and it works fine even when I add
th
sorry for the mess i made with my emails, but i was get confused
seeing i was not receiving the emails others write me back,
to see on the web that other's answers were not on my thread
and my answers didn't show up
i guess is not only my fault
Hi Michael,
Check the mail before on some comments on a similar old post. I will
put some code in here when I can and if no one finds the solution to
my problem.
The strange thing is that no binary corruption occurs on signature if
image is added to a new page, but it occurs if i add it to the sam
So, It's me again, I was passing through old related topics on the
mailing list and saw a very similar problem. (Look bellow.) My problem
with Paulo Soares answer is that it's not exactly right.
Since just as I said, if I add the image to a new page the signature
info just says the document has be
So, It's me again, I was passing through old related topics on the
mailing list and saw a very similar problem. (Look bellow.) My problem
with Paulo Soares answer is that it's not exactly right.
Since just as I said, if I add the image to a new page the signature
info just says the document has be
must make sure you change the document in append mode.
If you work in append mode and think your changes are allowed, please do throw
in some code and a sample pdf.
Regards, Michael.
2009/4/16 rui fernandes
>
> So, It's me again, I was passing thr
t;iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
The signature is there to show that the document was not changed. If you
change the document the signature becomes invalid. It's not rocket
science.
Paulo
2009/4/16 rui fernandes
> Hi,
>
> When I add an image to an already signe
Hi,
When I add an image to an already signed document, the final document gets
the old signature info corrupted. If I add the image to a new page on the
same document the problem doesn't happen. Both image adding and signing are
made with itext.
Does anyone knows this problem already or should I
12 matches
Mail list logo
