-- Original message --
From: "Edward W. Rouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Ah. Ok, I think I understand. The full compression compresses both the
> stream data and the document structure, but the setCompressionLevel only
> compresses the stream data. So since the stream
onday, August 11, 2008 12:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Question on compression.
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:57:18 -0400
"Edward W. Rouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I am. I run the program once with no compression, file size 3
--- Original message --
From: "Edward W. Rouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Lol, it wasn't a complaint, it was a question. And it was a valid question.
> I would expect that if I used setCompressionLevel(9) that the resulting file
> should be smaller than using no compre
Hi,
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:57:18 -0400
"Edward W. Rouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes I am. I run the program once with no compression, file size 34.3K. I run
> again with compression level 9, file size 34.3K. No difference.
Hm, OK. I think in that case, there's just no compressable (is that
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Question on compression.
Hi,
Edward W. Rouse wrote:
> Lol, it wasn't a complaint, it was a question. And it was a valid
> question. I would expect that if I used setCompressionLevel(9) that
> the resulting file should be smaller than using no compression at
&
iText-questions] Question on compression.
Hi,
Edward W. Rouse wrote:
> Lol, it wasn't a complaint, it was a question. And it was a valid
> question. I would expect that if I used setCompressionLevel(9) that
> the resulting file should be smaller than using no compression at
> a
Hi,
Edward W. Rouse wrote:
> Lol, it wasn't a complaint, it was a question. And it was a valid
> question. I would expect that if I used setCompressionLevel(9) that
> the resulting file should be smaller than using no compression at
> all. It isn't.
Are you comparing an iText generated uncompres
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 1T3XT
info
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2008 3:22 AM
To: Post all your questions about iText here
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Question on compression.
Edward W. Rouse wrote:
> I already checked on that. Was told (not able to personally verify) that
>
Edward W. Rouse wrote:
> I already checked on that. Was told (not able to personally verify) that
> it is the newest version of GS for Solaris 10.
If you can open the PDF with Adobe Reader,
you should complain to the GS people,
not to the iText developers.
--
This answer is provided by 1T3XT BVB
iText here
Subject: Re: [iText-questions] Question on compression.
Or the fact that you have a VERY OLD version of Ghostscript - since "full
compression" was added to the PDF specification with version 1.5 (Acrobat
6), which is about 7+ years ago at this point.
Leonard
On A
Or the fact that you have a VERY OLD version of Ghostscript - since
"full compression" was added to the PDF specification with version 1.5
(Acrobat 6), which is about 7+ years ago at this point.
Leonard
On Aug 8, 2008, at 2:48 PM, Edward W. Rouse wrote:
Using version 2.1.3, PdfCopy. If I u
Using version 2.1.3, PdfCopy. If I use setFullCompression, the file gets
compressed, but Ghostscript can't read it. If I use setCompressionLevel,
Ghostscript is fine with it but it seems that it's because the file isn't
getting compressed at all. I updated to current version from 2.0.7 because
setC
12 matches
Mail list logo
