Hi All,
There has been a lot of discussion about this on the list. IUP, CD and IM
have secondary libraries that use third party libraries.
The secondary libraries follow their third party libraries license terms
as described by the documentation in their respective pages. And this does
NOT
G'day all,
[Sorry for breaking the thread -- digest strikes again...]
Like RMS, I strongly dislike "Open Source" as an umbrella term, and strongly
prefer "Free (as in Freedom)" or "Libre" (e.g. LibreOffice): The underlying
concepts are massively, massively different.
Before I go any further,
Tysen,
On 2020-06-05 at 9:10 AM, "Moore, Tysen" wrote:
>Ranier,
>My reasoning for my initial email was not to cause a big fight in this list.
Everyone knows you didn't mean for that to happen. The "big fight" you are
seeing is just people who like to fight to have a reason to fight.
>I was
De: Moore, Tysen
Enviado: sexta-feira, 5 de junho de 2020 16:10
Para: IUP discussion list.
Assunto: Re: [Iup-users] Fw: IUP License Questions
>I'm not sure I entirely agree with your statement: "The point here is that IUP
>project have nothing to do with it all. >After all, who is possibly
Ranier,
I'm not sure I entirely agree with your statement: "The point here is that IUP
project have nothing to do with it all. After all, who is possibly violating
the GPL is the end user of the libraries (CD and IM). The IUP project only
provides, as a courtesy, the source code of the GPL
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> FFTW is GPL, and not can be use with commercial closed products.
> MiniLZO is
De: Richard Stallman
Enviado: sexta-feira, 5 de junho de 2020 03:17
Para: Ranier Vilela
Cc: arobinso...@cox.net; iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Assunto: Re: [Iup-users] Fw: IUP License Questions
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US
