Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-11-12 Thread Larry K
Just wanted to follow up on this thread to let everyone know what became of this issue. First, I gave up on the 500 and returned it in exchange for another 250. So now, I have dual 250s. I installed one of the 250s and went through the motions of trying to validate the feed on /dev/video0

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-11 Thread Timothy McFadden
That step was specific to using a PVR-350 with TV Out ( under the heading Running X on the PVR-350's TV-Out ). -Tim On 10/10/05, Larry K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tim, I don't see that anywhere in Jarod's guide. Appreciate further info. On 10/10/05, Timothy McFadden [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Larry K
Tim, I don't see that anywhere in Jarod's guide. Appreciate further info.On 10/10/05, Timothy McFadden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Also check to see if you used Jarod's mkinit-rd patch to include the ivtv drivers.You need to re-make the initial ramdisk with the newdrivers

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Larry K
I now have the right version of the ivtv driver loading. To do this I had to upgrade to kernel 2.6-12-1.1378 in order to get atrpms to install the driver properly. I was using 2.6-10.x and there appears to be no prepackaged ivtv 0.3.x driver for this kernel. Now, having gotten the ivtv driver

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Larry K
One additional thing I fergot to mention. If I take out the 3 alias commands from modprobe.conf: alias tveeprom tveeprom-ivtv alias tuner tuner-ivtv alias msp3400 msp3400-ivtv The unknown module messages go away in the dmesg output. Then, the modprobe info looks the same as above. Any

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 10 October 2005 22:13, Larry K wrote: I now have the right version of the ivtv driver loading. To do this I had to upgrade to kernel 2.6-12-1.1378 in order to get atrpms to install the driver properly. I was using 2.6-10.x and there appears to be no prepackaged ivtv 0.3.x driver for

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Keith C
On Oct 10, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Larry K wrote: I now have the right version of the ivtv driver loading. To do this I had to upgrade to kernel 2.6-12-1.1378 in order to get atrpms to install the driver properly. I was using 2.6-10.x and there appears to be no prepackaged ivtv 0.3.x driver

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Larry K
On 10/10/05, Keith C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 10, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Larry K wrote: I now have the right version of the ivtv driver loading.To do this I had to upgrade to kernel 2.6-12-1.1378 in order to get atrpms to install the driver properly.I was using 2.6-10.x and there appears to be

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Larry K
I don't have the tveeprom.c anywhere on my system ( I searched for it like so: find / -name tveeprom.c). I suspect I am using the kernel version of tveeprom now. However, I still have the original issue that is the source of my angst: I get good audio and video on /video1, but nothing but static

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Tyler Trafford
Keith C wrote: On Oct 10, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Larry K wrote: I now have the right version of the ivtv driver loading. To do this I had to upgrade to kernel 2.6-12-1.1378 in order to get atrpms to install the driver properly. I was using 2.6-10.x and there appears to be no prepackaged ivtv

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Larry K
I can certainly install the card on my win2k machine as a test. What I'm doing now to test the card is to cat from /dev/video0 and /dev/video1, like so: # /usr/bin/ivtvctl -u 0x3000 -d /dev/video0 # /usr/bin/ivtvctl -p 6 -d /dev/video0 # /usr/bin/ivtvctl -f width=720,height=480 -d /dev/video0

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Adam Forsyth
This problem has come up on the list several times before. lirc_i2c sometimes pulls in the cx88xx module for some reason (doesn't happen to me any more, but did until fairly recently) and that conflicts with the ivtv version of tveeprom. For me, editing tveeprom.c did NOT fix the problem, I still

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Keith C
Why is cx88xx loading? You have another capture card in there somewhere? And if you do, this is a conflict where the kernel cx88xx module will not use the ivtv tveeprom. So you'll have to use the kernel version of tveeprom. I don't have anything installed except the PVR-500MCE. I have no

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Adam Forsyth
I don't have anything installed except the PVR-500MCE. I have no idea why cx88xx is loading. The machine has the pvr-500 and an nvidia video card. That's it. Then you should probably look into why bttv/cx88xx is loading. Thats not a good thing. Look through dmesg for more bttv and

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-10 Thread Adam Forsyth
On 10/10/05, Larry K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I'm using 0.3.8. Not 0.4.x. Ok. Well, I looked back at the thread and there were so many messages that I'm a bit confused. Do locate tveeprom.ko, then move any it finds to tveeprom.ko.HIDE. Repeat for tuner and tda9887. Then reboot. Since

[ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-09 Thread Larry K
I am trying to troubleshoot a new PVR-500 that only works at video1, while video0 produces black and white static (no audio). After pursuing numerous leads, I noticed somethin in my log that caught my eye. I thought I was running version 0.3.8 of the ivtv driver based on what I had installed

Re: [ivtv-devel] Noob question about ivtv driver version

2005-10-09 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005, Larry K wrote: Is something wrong here? Does 0.2.0 in this context mean that I'm not loading the 0.3.8 driver? Yes; see the very recent archives for the Cannot install new 0.4.0 ivtv drivers thread. Cheers, Phil ___ ivtv-devel