Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-24 Thread Rich Kadel
for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues On Saturday 24 February 2007 08:27, Rich Kadel wrote: So far it is working. I had trouble reusing the CentOS 4.3 (upgraded to kernel 2.6.18) from when I was using the AMD Opteron

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-23 Thread Stanley Merkx
-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:28:53 -0800 Rich Kadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have to do that, but I'll have to swap out the CPU as well (and maybe memory). Could be pricey, but I need the stability. If that's what

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-23 Thread Rich Kadel
Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues Replying to my own post to add more detail: According to the manual mine is a 945PL Neo (MS-7236). Cannot reboot now to have a look at the BIOS (doing 2 recordings and a playback at the moment ;-)). So

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues Replying to my own post to add more detail: According to the manual mine is a 945PL Neo (MS-7236). Cannot reboot now to have a look at the BIOS (doing 2

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-22 Thread Rich Kadel
Of Brad Barnett Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:54 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:28:53 -0800 Rich Kadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have to do

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-22 Thread Brad Barnett
of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:28:53 -0800 Rich Kadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I may have to do that, but I'll have to swap out the CPU as well (and maybe memory). Could be pricey, but I

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-22 Thread Mr. Myth
Brad Barnett wrote: On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:51:58 -0800 Rich Kadel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The real test would be if all 4 PVR 500's will work (stable) with a new motherboard, and I don't have a motherboard in my desktop machine with 4 PCI slots. On a whim, I've crossed my fingers and

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-21 Thread Rich Kadel
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:34 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues Rich, 4 PVR 500s is a heavy DMA load

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-21 Thread Brad Barnett
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:34 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues Rich, 4 PVR 500s is a heavy DMA load for any

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-21 Thread Rich Kadel
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:34 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:34 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-18 Thread Rich Kadel
, February 17, 2007 12:56 AM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues Hi, Rich Kadel: I got about 200,000 lines of these messages between 09:00:48 (local) and 09:07:38 That's a bit excessive

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-16 Thread Rich Kadel
driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues Hi Rich, Please check out the latest trunk from subversion. This bug is fixed. It was a subtle error resulting in these spurious errors. Thanks for reporting this, Hans On Friday 16

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-16 Thread Rich Kadel
Feb 16 09:07:35 server2 kernel: ivtv0: All encoder VBI stream buffers are full. Dropping data. Feb 16 09:07:35 server2 kernel: ivtv0: Cause: the application is not reading fast enough. Note that these messages are from different cards (ivtv0 and ivtv1)! Those were just examples. These

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-15 Thread Rich Kadel
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hans Verkuil Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:52 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues On Monday 12 February 2007 00:58, Rich Kadel wrote: Kernel

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-15 Thread Rich Kadel
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Kadel Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 8:43 AM To: 'Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver' Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues So far so good with 0.10.0rc1. At least

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-15 Thread Rich Kadel
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hans Verkuil Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 3:42 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues On Thursday 15 February 2007 17:42, Rich Kadel wrote

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-12 Thread Rich Kadel
Verkuil Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 10:52 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues On Monday 12 February 2007 00:58, Rich Kadel wrote: Kernel: 2.6.18.6 IVTV: 0.8.2 CPU: AMD Opteron

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-12 Thread Rich Kadel
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Barnett Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 5:34 PM To: Discussion list for development of the IVTV driver Subject: Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues Rich, 4 PVR 500s is a heavy DMA load for any system. What motherboard

[ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-11 Thread Rich Kadel
Kernel: 2.6.18.6 IVTV: 0.8.2 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 146 (Family: 15, Model: 39, Stepping: 1) I have a generic 4U AMD Opteron server that was running fine for long periods until I started using the IVTV driver. It's a CentOS 4.3 system. I was using the default 2.6.9 kernel, but ran into

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-11 Thread Brad Barnett
Rich, 4 PVR 500s is a heavy DMA load for any system. What motherboard does this system employ? What chipset does the motherboard have? VIA chipsets, for example, are particularly prone to DMA issues. A lockup due to a DMA issue can cause all sorts of issue, including your hard drive going

Re: [ivtv-devel] System (practically) non-responsive after several hours...no clues

2007-02-11 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 12 February 2007 00:58, Rich Kadel wrote: Kernel: 2.6.18.6 IVTV: 0.8.2 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 146 (Family: 15, Model: 39, Stepping: 1) I have a generic 4U AMD Opteron server that was running fine for long periods until I started using the IVTV driver. It's a CentOS 4.3