On 05/10/05, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I missing something on the versioning scheme of ivtv? I
downloaded the 0.3.9 tarball a week or so ago and managed a make a pvr-500
work with it.
Last night I downloaded 0.3.9 again, and it refused to compile
with
Hi,
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Am I missing something on the versioning scheme of ivtv? I
downloaded the 0.3.9 tarball a week or so ago and managed a make a
pvr-500 work with it.
Last night I downloaded 0.3.9 again, and it refused to compile
with errors:
Is a version number such as 0.3.9 actually a current svn snapshot?
If so, that's quite confusing. I suggest that a version be a version...
not to change. If it's a snapshot, version it with the date, e.g.
ivtv-20051005
or
ivtv-0.3.9-20051005
-Cory
If you've downloaded from
Hi,
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Am I missing something on the versioning scheme of ivtv? I
downloaded the 0.3.9 tarball a week or so ago and managed a make a
pvr-500 work with it.
Last night I downloaded 0.3.9 again, and it refused to compile
with errors:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 09:42:35AM -0400, Ross wrote:
On 10/5/05, Hans Verkuil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly is the purpose of this mirror? The latest svn source can
already be downloaded directly from
http://ivtvdriver.org/viewcvs/ivtv/trunk/.
Agreed. Is the tarball
The latest svn source can already be downloaded directly from
http://ivtvdriver.org/viewcvs/ivtv/trunk/. The ivtvdriver.org wiki needs
to be updated to clearly point to this but other than that I see no reason
for this mirrored archive (except for confusing people :-).
Since you're talking
On 10/6/05, Adam Forsyth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under development navigation section remove the Subversion link,
and change the Trac link to Trac Subversion Info or something
like that, since the info on the subversion repository is there. If
someone actually wants to browse the subversion
