>
> Do you mean upgrading Jailhouse (and only that) from 0.9 to 0.11?
>
>
Yes
We refactored quite a bit between the two releases. Namely, 0.10 brought
> per-cpu page tables.
>
Page table might be the cause, but I am not sure.
I did noticed that my my process updating the page table during
Signed-off-by: Alex Largacha
---
inmates/demos/arm/pl-irq-demo.c | 170
inmates/demos/arm64/Makefile| 3 +-
2 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 inmates/demos/arm/pl-irq-demo.c
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Alex Largacha
---
Documentation/setup-on-zynqmp-ultrazed3eg.md | 128 +++
1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/setup-on-zynqmp-ultrazed3eg.md
diff --git a/Documentation/setup-on-zynqmp-ultrazed3eg.md
This patch series adds support for UltraZed SOM + UltraZed SOM + UltraZed-EG IO
Carrier Card
It adds also a demo to measure the lattency of a PL generated interrupt in a
baremetal inmate
Alex Largacha (3):
configs: arm64: add config files for UltraZed SOM + UltraZed carrier
IOCC
Signed-off-by: Alex Largacha
---
configs/arm64/ultrazed3eg-iocc-pl-gic-demo.c | 120 +
configs/arm64/ultrazed3eg-iocc.c | 154 +++
2 files changed, 274 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 configs/arm64/ultrazed3eg-iocc-pl-gic-demo.c
create
On 24.10.19 13:01, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
>
> On 24/10/19 4:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 24.10.19 12:09, Peng Fan wrote:
Subject: Re: kernel build failure
On 24.10.19 08:07, 'Lokesh Vutla' via Jailhouse wrote:
>
>
> On 23/10/19 3:47 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
On 24/10/19 4:28 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 24.10.19 12:09, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> Subject: Re: kernel build failure
>>>
>>> On 24.10.19 08:07, 'Lokesh Vutla' via Jailhouse wrote:
On 23/10/19 3:47 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> When MODVERSIONS and ASM_MODVERSIONS
On 24.10.19 12:09, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: kernel build failure
>>
>> On 24.10.19 08:07, 'Lokesh Vutla' via Jailhouse wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/10/19 3:47 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Jan,
When MODVERSIONS and ASM_MODVERSIONS defined, your
>> queue/jailhouse tree will have build
> Subject: Re: kernel build failure
>
> On 24.10.19 08:07, 'Lokesh Vutla' via Jailhouse wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 23/10/19 3:47 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Hi Jan,
> >>
> >> When MODVERSIONS and ASM_MODVERSIONS defined, your
> queue/jailhouse tree will have build failure for ARM64.
> >>
> >> MODPOST
On 24.10.19 10:17, Chung-Fan Yang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I observed that the interrupt latency raise from 20us to 50us (measures
> in an RTOS) after I upgraded from v0.9 to v1.1.
Do you mean upgrading Jailhouse (and only that) from 0.9 to 0.11?
>
> I am working on x86_64, so I am suspecting CPU bug
On 24.10.19 08:07, 'Lokesh Vutla' via Jailhouse wrote:
>
>
> On 23/10/19 3:47 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> When MODVERSIONS and ASM_MODVERSIONS defined, your queue/jailhouse tree will
>> have build failure for ARM64.
>>
>> MODPOST vmlinux.o
>> WARNING: EXPORT symbol "__hyp_stub_vectors"
Hello,
I observed that the interrupt latency raise from 20us to 50us (measures in
an RTOS) after I upgraded from v0.9 to v1.1.
I am working on x86_64, so I am suspecting CPU bug mitigations.
I would like to ask that are there any CPU bugs mitigations in effect?
However, I do find out that in
On 23/10/19 3:47 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> When MODVERSIONS and ASM_MODVERSIONS defined, your queue/jailhouse tree will
> have build failure for ARM64.
>
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> WARNING: EXPORT symbol "__hyp_stub_vectors" [vmlinux] version generation
> failed, symbol will not be
13 matches
Mail list logo