Hi David,
I did a quick program change.
I just extended the existing 6 standard pwm's to 12 and all compiles. In the
sample program I am using pwm 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 11 since that is what the
PIC16F1778 has on board so you may have changed the number for your PIC (that's
why I made it up to
Hi David,
When I took over the device file generation scripts of Rob Hamerling I also got
all his - hundreds - of PIC samples and because of that I do have a PIC16F1778
which is of the same family and has 6 PWM's (three 10-bit and three 16-bit) so
I could give it a try if I can extend the
The primary goal is to make the difference between a "normal" reset (POR,
MCLR, Reset instruction...) and an abnormal condition (Stack under or over
flow, Watchdog reset, brown out).
Going then more in details is useful for debugging. A BOR or a WDT will
need totally other ways of
To be honest, in my application, I need 6 PWM signals.
Since they must be equivalent to one another, I will use some 16-bits
modules but without those new features, and with a duty cycle defined with
only the 10 MSB
So, as far as I am concerned, there is no need for a specific 16-bit PWM
Option 3 is definitely to best one ! Thanks Rob !
Le jeudi 4 avril 2024 à 20:44:53 UTC+2, Rob CJ a écrit :
> Hi David,
>
> I added option 3) to the library. Not yet tested and not yet uploaded but
> can you give it a try.
>
> So define:
> const I2C_USER_BUS_SPEED = 50_000
>
> And give it a
Good day, I have finished a build of jallib-standard.
BUILD COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY
Click here to view the log.
Great job team Jallib!
Sincerely,
Jallib Build Server
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jallib" group.
To