once
while scanning for viruses.
Vincenzo
-Original Message-
From: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: domenica 22 giugno 2003 10.23
To: James Users List
Subject: RE: Virus scanning (was RE: Matchers X Window)
This magic number topic is quite new to me
Try telling a Mac-user (or a Unix-user) that he *must* put a
file-extension on the filename ;-)
If there isn't an extension, then it doesn't need to match. :-)
As far as I know, only Windows and VMS require a file extension in the
filename.
Actually, that's part of the problem. Although
As graphic parts can't carry viruses, is it necessary to get the content at
all? Not doing so would circumvent the problem and speed things up too.
How do you know it is really a graphic? All you know is that the
mime-type description has been set to image/gif.
It might have a file-name that
As graphic parts can't carry viruses, is it necessary to get the content
at
all? Not doing so would circumvent the problem and speed things up too.
How do you know it is really a graphic? All you know is that the
mime-type description has been set to image/gif. It might have a
file-name
: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 June 2003 15:47
To: James Users List
Subject: RE: Matchers X Window
As graphic parts can't carry viruses, is it necessary to get
the content
at
all? Not doing so would circumvent the problem and speed
things up too.
How do
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:06:27AM +0200, Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
In 1.1.6 it is taken out.
Has just been installed.
Oki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on *nix.
d.
-Original Message-
From: Oki DZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 June 2003 02:29
To: James Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Matchers X Window
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 09:28:46AM +0100, Steve Brewin wrote:
Running on Solaris right?
I'm running Linux
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:19:46PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Looks like something not in the class loader's path. And I have no idea
why. I don't have X11 installed on any *nix system. Strictly headless
servers.
Neither I have.
But my guess is that the JVM saw that you have a
Oki,
What happened is that the matcher tried to get the content of an attached object (a
.gif) to write it decoded to a temp file to have the antivirus later scan it; the
javax.mail.internet.MimeBodyPart.getContent(MimeBodyPart), for doing that, tried a
path that for any reason threw an
for the next attachment.
Vincenzo
-Original Message-
From: Oki DZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: giovedi 19 giugno 2003 9.34
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: Matchers X Window
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:19:46PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Looks like something not in the class
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 09:51:27AM +0200, Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
javax.mail.internet.MimeBodyPart.getContent(MimeBodyPart), for doing
that, tried a path that for any reason threw an exception, which
could be ignored (a .gif is not a virus).
It happened twice today; I looked into the
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:01:53AM +0200, Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
java.io.UnsupportedEncodingException, that is always ignored in the
matcher, that simpy continues looking for the next attachment.
So, what is the quick fix? I have uncommented the mailet element that
has the matcher.
Vincenzo
You will not get the problem under Win2K, its Solaris specific.
Looking at the stack trace, its triggered when...
it.praxis.james.matchers.IsInfected.dumpPart(IsInfected.java:418)
invokes...
javax.mail.internet.MimeBodyPart.getContent(MimeBodyPart.java:564)
...while processing a
Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: giovedi 19 giugno 2003 12.02
To: 'James Users List'
Subject: RE: Matchers X Window
Vincenzo
You will not get the problem under Win2K, its Solaris specific.
Looking at the stack trace, its triggered when
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
Have you set scanAlways to true or false in your IsInfected invocation?
It is set to false.
When you get the exception, what happens to the mail message: is it
sent to destination or sent to the error processor?
The
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:01:40AM +0100, Steve Brewin wrote:
invokes...
javax.mail.internet.MimeBodyPart.getContent(MimeBodyPart.java:564)
...while processing a .gif part.
As graphic parts can't carry viruses, is it necessary to get the content at
all? Not doing so would circumvent the
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 02:12:49PM +0200, Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini wrote:
This to find also viruses hidden under wrong extensions. It could be
*optionally* changed to scan only known file extensions, and would be
a good thing to do.
It would be great if they (file extensions or scan them
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 09:28:46AM +0100, Steve Brewin wrote:
Running on Solaris right?
I'm running Linux.
The Solaris implementation of AWT requires a
display device and by default uses DISPLAY 0:0. According to Sun this is not
a bug and will not be fixed.
I see; so it's a feature. I have
If I have time to do a test build tonight, will you have time to test
it?
I'm currently going to install the following:
Specification-Version: 1.1.6
Implementation-Vendor-Id: it.praxis
That is Vincenzo's personal matcher, and not part of a James distribution.
I will update the James test
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:59:54PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm starting the build now. It should be online in about 30 minutes or so.
Downloading...
Look for a7.
OK.
Oki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:39:38PM -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Don't confuse James with Vincenzo's anti-virus code.
Hey, I have just recently been back to this list, slow down please.
Oki
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Hey, I have just recently been back to this list, slow down please.
:-)
To clarify, then. If you download it from here, it is part of James. If
you down it from Marco Tedone's Jamailet project, or Vincenzo's personal
collection of matchers/mailets, it isn't part of James. Which is not to say
BTW, here is the version of the JVM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ java -version
java version 1.4.1
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
Blackdown-1.4.1-01)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.4.1-01, mixed mode)
Oki
Looks like something not in the class loader's path. And I have no idea
why. I don't have X11 installed on any *nix system. Strictly headless
servers. But my guess is that the JVM saw that you have a DISPLAY, and
wanted to pop-up a dialog.
--- Noel
24 matches
Mail list logo
