[SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Re: How to unsubscribe (was: [SPAM] Re: Why Jami?)

2020-05-24 Thread Ch G
Thank you ⁣-- Voice recognition : please forgive the presentation and spelling. Télécharger TypeApp pour Android ​ Le 22 mai 2020 à 21:05, à 21:05, Dmitry Alexandrov a écrit: >bill-auger wrote: >> ChG wrote: >>> Can someone tell me how to unsubscribe to this email list ? >> >> this is a

Re: Why Jami? Does ‘distributed messenger’ make sense?

2020-05-24 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Сергей Петров wrote: > Today any resource/site/service can be blacklisted by country government. Today, _you_ can be blacklisted by the government much more easily. > That's why i don't want to rely on some specific service Is there any other nameserver for Jami but ns.ring.cx available at the

Re: Public TURN servers. Why Jami?

2020-05-24 Thread Сергей Петров
>> and so on. >Namely? Today any resource/site/service can be blacklisted by country government. That's why i don't want to rely on some specific service or sip provider. I prefer distributed/decentralized messengers like Jami or Tox. > as for messaging — unfortunately, itʼs complicated. Iʼd

Re: How to unsubscribe (was: [SPAM] Re: Why Jami?)

2020-05-22 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
bill-auger wrote: > ChG wrote: >> Can someone tell me how to unsubscribe to this email list ? > > this is a standard "mailman" mailing list - the delivery controls are very > similar for most mailing lists that you will come across - you can subscribe > or unsubscribe, temporarily or

Re: Public TURN servers. Why Jami?

2020-05-22 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Сергей Петров wrote: >> what exactly have motivated you and your friend to experiment with Jami, >> instead of sticking with a standard, i. e. SIP-based, solution? > > Mostly it's because of privacy ‘Privacy’ is a buzzword, I suppose you mean end-to-end encryption. Using standard SIP in no way

Re: [SPAM] Re: Why Jami?

2020-05-22 Thread bill-auger
ChG - this is a standard "mailman" mailing list - the delivery controls are very similar for most mailing lists that you will come across - you can subscribe or unsubscribe, temporarily or permanently, at any time, using the same web page that you used to subscribe originally, in this case:

Re: Public TURN servers. Why Jami?

2020-05-22 Thread Greg Troxel
Сергей Петров writes: > I have found lists of public STUN servers ( > https://gist.github.com/mondain/b0ec1cf5f60ae726202e and > https://gist.github.com/sagivo/3a4b2f2c7ac6e1b5267c2f1f59ac6c6b), but only > a few TURN's. It seems a bit strange. With STUN, you basically send a small number of

Re: [SPAM] Re: Why Jami?

2020-05-22 Thread ChG
Hi, Can someone tell me how to unsubscribe to this email list ? Rgds. ChG NB: Saisie des accents omise, ou reconnaissance vocale approximative. Désolé. For a greener planet, please don't print this email unless necessary. On 22/05/2020 12:50, Sruli Saurymper wrote: Another thing is that it

Re: Public TURN servers. Why Jami? (was: communication issues + What does the STUN switch do?)

2020-05-22 Thread Сергей Петров
I have found lists of public STUN servers ( https://gist.github.com/mondain/b0ec1cf5f60ae726202e and https://gist.github.com/sagivo/3a4b2f2c7ac6e1b5267c2f1f59ac6c6b), but only a few TURN's. It seems a bit strange. > what exactly have motivated you and your friend to experiment with Jami, instead

Re: Why Jami?

2020-05-22 Thread Sruli Saurymper
> Another thing is that it at least earlier did not seem possible to start > up jami and use it without creating a jami address, and just do SIP. It > seems obvious that this should be possible if it "supports SIP". I > realize there is no great cost to creating an account, but someone might >

Re: Why Jami?

2020-05-22 Thread Greg Troxel
Dmitry Alexandrov writes: >> Server-based SIP is still fully supported. > > Unfortunately, itʼs not easy to find not even a good manual, but just > a brief overview of it: what exactly ‘fully supported’ means. > > Itʼs pretty reasonable for an end user to expect a full-blown SIP > client to

Re: Why Jami?

2020-05-21 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Iʼm glad to see you here, thus seeing that this m/l is not totally abandoned. Adrien Béraud wrote: > Dmitry Alexandrov wrote: >> bill-auger wrote: >>> FWIW, jami is also a SIP [soft-]phone >> >> Yes, but itʼs a legacy. > > SIP is not legacy and we commit to keep supporting it, Okay, itʼs not,

Re: Why Jami?

2020-05-21 Thread Adrien Béraud
À: "bill-auger" Cc: "jami" Envoyé: Jeudi 21 Mai 2020 12:56:49 Objet: Re: Why Jami? bill-auger wrote: > FWIW, jami is also a SIP [soft-]phone Yes, but itʼs a legacy.

Re: Why Jami?

2020-05-21 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
bill-auger wrote: > FWIW, jami is also a SIP [soft-]phone Yes, but itʼs a legacy. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Public TURN servers. Why Jami? (was: communication issues + What does the STUN switch do?)

2020-05-21 Thread bill-auger
FWIW, jami is also a SIP phone