Iʼm glad to see you here, thus seeing that this m/l is not totally abandoned.
Adrien Béraud <[email protected]> wrote: > Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]> wrote: >> bill-auger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> FWIW, jami is also a SIP [soft-]phone >> >> Yes, but itʼs a legacy. > > SIP is not legacy and we commit to keep supporting it, Okay, itʼs not, if you say so. > However but we currently focus on Jami accounts Yes, thanks, thatʼs what I meant to say. > Server-based SIP is still fully supported. Unfortunately, itʼs not easy to find not even a good manual, but just a brief overview of it: what exactly ‘fully supported’ means. Itʼs pretty reasonable for an end user to expect a full-blown SIP client to contain certain features, which are technically not parts of the SIP proper: such as end-to-end encryption of media stream, which means support of ZRTP. But Jami does not support ZRTP, does it?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
