Re: WSDL 2.0 for mobiles

2010-04-02 Thread Demetris
Hi Martin, actually with Java 1.6 I don't see issues - just the examples were not 100% compatible with the current state of Woden. My issue is running it under J2ME (based on Java 1.4). As others pointed out most likely I will need to do the parsing myself on mobile devices. Thanks again M

Re: Axis2/Spring new module or new sub project

2010-04-02 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 14:09, Samisa Abeysinghe > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Sagara Gunathunga > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all , > >> > >> During our discussion we got several ideas about the location of this > >> proje

RE: WSDL 2.0 for mobiles

2010-04-02 Thread Martin Gainty
demetris- i'm running woden-dom-1.0M8 under JVM 1.6.0_16 and have not experienced any anomalies (thus far) what types of issues are you running into? thanks, Martin Gainty __ Verzicht und Vertraulichkeitanmerkung/Note de déni et de confidential

RE: Axis2-Spring integration

2010-04-02 Thread Martin Gainty
thanks to andre for this essential howto on spring integration! i ran a quick test (using pojoguidespring/META-INF/services.xml) for WeatherSpringService (here is the descriptor) Weather Spring POJO Axis2 AAR deployment sample.spring.service.WeatherSpringService

Re: Axis2/Spring new module or new sub project

2010-04-02 Thread Andreas Veithen
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 14:09, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Sagara Gunathunga > wrote: >> >> Hi all , >> >> During our discussion we got several ideas about the location of this >> project . >> >> 1.) Integrate into the existing axis2-spring module. >> 2.) Create

Re: Axis2/Spring new module or new sub project

2010-04-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Sagara Gunathunga < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all , > > During our discussion we got several ideas about the location of this > project . > > 1.) Integrate into the existing axis2-spring module. > 2.) Create a new Spring module within the Spring core

Re: [Axis2-Spring] Let's get started: servlet + axis2.xml + JSR-181

2010-04-02 Thread Samisa Abeysinghe
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Andreas Veithen wrote: > I think that it helps to keep the discussions more focused if we > actually start to have some code. Sounds good. Where would we have the code? Samisa... -- blog: http://samisa-abeysinghe.blogspot.com/

Axis2/Spring new module or new sub project

2010-04-02 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
Hi all , During our discussion we got several ideas about the location of this project . 1.) Integrate into the existing axis2-spring module. 2.) Create a new Spring module within the Spring core project. 3.) Create new sub project like Rampart or Axis Transport 4.) Anything else Among above op

Re: [Axis2-Spring] Let's get started: servlet + axis2.xml + JSR-181

2010-04-02 Thread Andreas Veithen
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 09:40, van Hugten, Stephan wrote: > I agree with this approach, but want to add that I already added some code > for component-scanning to [1] so it's doesn't hurt to add it to the start. That is a very valuable contribution, but let's first start with the most basic stuff

Re: [Axis2-Spring] Let's get started: servlet + axis2.xml + JSR-181

2010-04-02 Thread Andreas Veithen
I think that it helps to keep the discussions more focused if we actually start to have some code. Even if the discussion about the overall goals is still ongoing, I think that there is a consensus around the following points: - Start from scratch (and select the best parts from the existing frame

Re: Axis2-Spring integration

2010-04-02 Thread Andreas Veithen
IBM uses Axis2 as the JAX-WS implementation in WebSphere 7 and they seem to be actively contributing fixes back to the Axis2 codebase. So the JAX-WS implementation should be very complete and stable. Andreas On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 05:04, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > So this thread mentions JAX-WS

Re: Axis2-Spring integration

2010-04-02 Thread Andreas Veithen
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 06:29, indika kumara wrote: > Please forgive me if I am asking an idiot question.  I do not have > good knowledge about spring.. > > I just want to get to know. > > Does this spring integration support to obtain any qualities offered > by the Spring  (runtime system quality

Re: Axis2-Spring integration

2010-04-02 Thread Andreas Veithen
In my blog post I noted the following as a prerequisite for any Axis2-Spring integration (but I didn't add that yet to the Wiki page): "Support for dependency injection and proxying for all user supplied objects: services, handlers, modules, password callbacks, etc." Here "proxying" meant AOP suppo

Re: Axis2-Spring integration

2010-04-02 Thread Andreas Veithen
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 08:42, Amila Suriarachchi wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Andreas Veithen > wrote: >> >> One last message with java-user in copy: I've created a page on our >> brand new Wiki: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/axis/Axis2Spring >> >> Please feel free to edit and add

Re: Axis2-Spring integration

2010-04-02 Thread Sagara Gunathunga
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Amila Suriarachchi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Andreas Veithen > wrote: > >> One last message with java-user in copy: I've created a page on our >> brand new Wiki: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/axis/Axis2Spring >> >>

Re: [Axis2-Spring] Let's get started: servlet + axis2.xml + JSR-181

2010-04-02 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Andreas Veithen wrote: > Devs, > > In order to get the Axis2-Spring thing started without getting lost in > endless discussions, I propose a very simple thing as a starter: > I think we agreed to discuss and come to agreement of the overall objective of the project

RE: [Axis2-Spring] Let's get started: servlet + axis2.xml + JSR-181

2010-04-02 Thread van Hugten, Stephan
I agree with this approach, but want to add that I already added some code for component-scanning to [1] so it's doesn't hurt to add it to the start. If I understand your last point correctly, I don't think this is much of an implication. In my vision we should make convention leading anyway and