[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451817 ]
wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550:
-
All Lucene unit tests have been adapted to work with my alternate index.
Everything but proximity queries
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-709?page=all ]
Chuck Williams updated LUCENE-709:
--
Attachment: ramDirSizeManagement.patch
This one should be golden as it addresses all the issues that have been raised
and I believe the syncrhonization is
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451763 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550:
wolfgang hoschek [21/Nov/06 10:22 AM]
Other question: when running the driver in test mode (checking for equality
of
QueryParser support for MatchAllDocs
-
Key: LUCENE-723
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-723
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: QueryParser
Affects
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451768 ]
wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550:
-
Ok. That means a basic test passes. For some more exhaustive tests, run all the
queries in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-723?page=comments#action_12451849 ]
Chuck Williams commented on LUCENE-723:
---
+1
With this could also come negative-only queries, e.g.
-foo
as a shortcut for
*:* -foo
QueryParser support
IndexModifier does not support all APIs from IndexWriter/IndexReader
Key: LUCENE-719
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-719
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451777 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550:
diff=-0.024093388, query=term*, scoreII=0.024093388, scoreRAM=0.024093388
Actually, diff != 0 means the test fails,
: How about the nightly build, if we include this on the site? I'm not
: familiar with it enough to comment. Yonik and Doug will know if/how
: things can be set up there with EMMA jars, should we include this on the
: site.
To throw another twist onto things, it would appear that the ASF has a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-721?page=comments#action_12451721 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-721:
-
Nice. I think we can't include EMMA jars int he repository, though, so you'll
want to add the ability to
21 nov 2006 kl. 21.52 skrev wolfgang hoschek (JIRA):
For some more exhaustive tests, run all the queries
I'm at home now. Will continue tomorrow.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-709?page=all ]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-709.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Thanks for bearing with me though this Chuck!
[PATCH] Enable application-level management of IndexWriter.ramDirectory size
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Thanks for investigating this Ryan!
Could you open a JIRA bug and maybe provide a patch? (and a testcase
reproducing the problem would be great too).
Will do. I've been busy the last few days, but hopefully will get around
to it soon.
Ryan
-Yonik
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451780 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550:
wolfgang hoschek [21/Nov/06 12:50 PM]
Ok. That means a basic test passes. For some more exhaustive tests, run all
the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-721?page=comments#action_12451806 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-721:
-
Sounds like my previous comment was off - if we don't distribute EMMA jars and
just require the person to have
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451726 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550:
Here is what I just sent to Wolgang. I've adapted his bench test case to also
work with InstantiatedIndex. It is worth
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-721?page=comments#action_12451727 ]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-721:
--
Good idea, I could do that. But currently we don't fetch the JUnit jars either,
just give a hint where to download
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-722?page=comments#action_12451809 ]
Andi Vajda commented on LUCENE-722:
---
Yes, you fixed it in one place but this file is actually duplicated in the
Lucene source tree.
The bug I filed was about
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-722?page=all ]
Andi Vajda reopened LUCENE-722:
---
contrib/queries/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/similar/MoreLikeThis.java is
still wrong.
DEFAULT spelled DEFALT in MoreLikeThis.java
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451731 ]
wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550:
-
Other question: when running the driver in test mode (checking for equality of
query results against
: Nice. I think we can't include EMMA jars int he repository, though, so
: you'll want to add the ability to download the Jar on the fly, just like
: Grant did it for the benchmark stuff.
that's not strictly neccessary is it? ... coverage reports could just be
an optional part of the build that
: Does anyone know what is the likely performance impact is when *not*
: using this feature? It's not easy for me to tell at a glance.
Assuming we get rid of the createLocalizedTokenMap call in setLocale, it
should be relatively minor: one extra boolean test of
useLocalizedOperators on each TERM
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-662?page=all ]
Nicolas Lalevée updated LUCENE-662:
---
Attachment: generic-fieldIO-3.patch
Here is an update of the patch:
- merged with the last commit in trunk
- I have fixed the issue with stream cloning
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12451730 ]
wolfgang hoschek commented on LUCENE-550:
-
What's the benchmark configuration? For example, is throughput bounded by
indexing or querying? Measuring N
Unit tests TestBackwardsCompatibility and TestIndexFileDeleter might fail
depending on JVM
--
Key: LUCENE-720
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-720
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Nice. I think we can't include EMMA jars int he repository, though, so
: you'll want to add the ability to download the Jar on the fly, just like
: Grant did it for the benchmark stuff.
that's not strictly neccessary is it? ... coverage reports could just be
an
DEFAULT spelled DEFALT in MoreLikeThis.java
---
Key: LUCENE-722
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-722
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Search
Affects
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-722?page=comments#action_12451697 ]
Andi Vajda commented on LUCENE-722:
---
http://svn.osafoundation.org/pylucene/trunk/patches.lucene contains a patch
(among others) to fix this.
DEFAULT spelled
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-709?page=comments#action_12451433 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-709:
-
1. Re. Yonik's comment about my synchronization scenario. Synhronizing as
described does resolve the issue.
In your
29 matches
Mail list logo
