[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656866#action_12656866
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Okay, I just full on did it inefficiently, and
Hi all,
(All examples below are using Lucene 2.2; if things have changed in
later versions please adjust accordingly, though a quick check of the
classes involved shows no major changes in trunk)
We have an interesting situation where we are effectively indexing two
'entities' in our system,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656852#action_12656852
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1484:
--
The patch is OK.
Found it "ant tes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656847#action_12656847
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Ugh -- that approach won't work,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656846#action_12656846
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. We should also test sorting by an enum fiel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656841#action_12656841
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1484:
Jason I didn't understand your co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656832#action_12656832
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
We should definitely try fallbac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Feak updated LUCENE-1491:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1491.patch
Patch includes test to highlight broken EgdeNGramTokenFilter and
NGramT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656783#action_12656783
]
Todd Feak commented on LUCENE-1491:
---
The NGramTokenFilter is affected by the same bug.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Todd Feak updated LUCENE-1491:
--
Affects Version/s: 3.0
2.9
2.4.1
> EdgeNGramTokenFilter
> I've only read through the jdoc of tier so far, but I'm guessing it's
> doing a dictionary search and splitting the the index readers position
> based on the result being less than or greater than upper / lower values.
> Which may be faster than a TermDocs seek, and certainly
> worth while invest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656770#action_12656770
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
I'm starting to think fall back to value wont b
Hi Uwe
True it's not a generic solution, but then again I wouldn't really
consider geo-search a generic ask.
The indexing format for locallucene uses something I call a tier
approach, similar to zoom levels in other mapping solutions.
Each tier has a separate set of projects or Cartesian id's
Hi Patrick,
very interesting approach. In my opinion to compare:
A standard RangeFilter is like using a standard relational database with
separate lat/lon fields, no index and operator "between". TrieRangeFilter is
the same like adding indexes to the lat/lon fields, which is for most cases
Hi Patrick,
very interesting approach. In my opinion to compare:
A standard RangeFilter is like using a standard relational database with
separate lat/lon fields, no index and operator "between". TrieRangeFilter is
the same like adding indexes to the lat/lon fields, which is for most cases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656741#action_12656741
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1482:
I haven't done any performance test since after f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1482:
Priority: Major (was: Minor)
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656739#action_12656739
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1482:
-
In the mail thread, Yonik said
(http:/
Hey Jason
o.a.l.s.trie looks interesting and has a lot of potential, locallucene
1.5+ release moved to a Cartesian tier system away from
the boundary box filter a while though.
A TierRange or RangeFilter as the one I used in v1.0 was a little
inefficient as you have to do a bit AND on 2 range
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656732#action_12656732
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Thanks Mike. Yup - that says enough for me. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656728#action_12656728
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
OK I ran an initial test, though
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656709#action_12656709
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
I just made a quick new test for what im doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656670#action_12656670
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Another thing I'll do is added another sort tes
About LocalLucene, it would benefit (be faster) by integrating with
TrieRangeQuery for the bounding box filter.
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> I'd also personally like to see 2.9 released sooner rather than later,
> maybe earliesh next ye
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656659#action_12656659
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. haven't tried to track it down yet...
I wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656654#action_12656654
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
There's something wrong w/ the So
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656653#action_12656653
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
BTW, one important difference w/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656610#action_12656610
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Some more quick comments:
the StringIndex valu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656608#action_12656608
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Thanks Mark. FWIW, when I genera
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1483:
Attachment: LUCENE-1483.patch
That actually had a system.out as well. Another patch that takes car
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
I have a bunch of file format changes to push through, and I'm
hoping to
implement them using pluggable modules. For instance, I'd like to
be able to
swap out bit-vector-based deletions for tombstone-based deletions,
just by
overriding a method or two.
I think Lu
31 matches
Mail list logo
