On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:48:51PM -0500, Ryan McKinley wrote:
> The other thing i am curious about is flexible indexing" -- i have not
> really followed what that means, but somewhere in there i got the idea
> we could implement an rtree directly...
I've been flogging the idea of an RTree in
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Congrats Uwe! Welcome. Can't wait to see what kind of magic you can work
> with trie and local lucene! (if indeed there is magic to be worked there)
+1
-Yonik
-
To unsubscri
Welcome, Uwe!
-Michael
Michael McCandless wrote:
I am happy to announce the Lucene PMC has accepted Uwe Schindler as a
contrib committer!
We recently committed Uwe's excellent TrieRangeQuery to contrib and
Uwe has also been active on the lists and with many tricky Jira issues
recently.
Congra
another interesting geohash link:
http://labs.metacarta.com/blog/27.entry/geographic-queries-on-google-app-engine/
seems like that has a perfect match with TrieRangeQuery
On Dec 19, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
On Dec 18, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Who is this shady cha
On Dec 18, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Who is this shady character and can he be trusted? :)
+1.
LocalLucene is awesome. Anyone investigated Jason's idea of
integrating the trie range query stuff?
There will be lots of things to investigate!
The other thing i am curious about
Congrats Uwe! Welcome. Can't wait to see what kind of magic you can work
with trie and local lucene! (if indeed there is magic to be worked there)
- Mark
Michael McCandless wrote:
I am happy to announce the Lucene PMC has accepted Uwe Schindler as a
contrib committer!
We recently committed U
I am happy to announce the Lucene PMC has accepted Uwe Schindler as a
contrib committer!
We recently committed Uwe's excellent TrieRangeQuery to contrib and
Uwe has also been active on the lists and with many tricky Jira issues
recently.
Congrats Uwe, and welcome!
Mike
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Broadly speaking, what areas are we looking to create new APIs for in
2.9? How dramatic are we looking to go?
That's not really the question. We shouldn't rush to get big API
changes in. Rather we should continue to cautiously evolve the API.
Periodically, when larg
Michael McCandless wrote:
Are you saying we can deprecate these classes in 2.9, and all methods
whose signature involves one of these classes, without offering the
new classes?
No. Folks should be able to recompile w/o deprecation warnings against
2.9, then upgrade to 3.0. Features should no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658116#action_12658116
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
OK wanna post a new patch w/ all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658096#action_12658096
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Thanks. I've got a convert on demand version to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658092#action_12658092
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Another fix to do: in StringOrdVa
Move solr NumberUtils to lucene
---
Key: LUCENE-1496
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Ryan McKinley
Priority: Trivial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658089#action_12658089
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-1387:
---
Agree -- but these changes are best made in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658085#action_12658085
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Yeah, wow. I've actually fixed that (though I d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658083#action_12658083
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
One more small thing: StringOrdVa
On Dec 19, 2008, at 6:08 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I just don't see how we will ever get to 3.0 if we continue this
path. People don't seem interested in much beyond new features and
bug fixes, so if we're going to do this 2.9 to 3.0 thing, I think
we need to
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I just don't see how we will ever get to 3.0 if we continue this
path. People don't seem interested in much beyond new features and
bug fixes, so if we're going to do this 2.9 to 3.0 thing, I think we
need to go for it a bit more wholeheartedly and say that 2.9 trul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658062#action_12658062
]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-1387:
--
I've taken some quick peeks into the code, ru
I had not time for until now, but maybe this can be combined. We had some
discussion about Trie and LovcalLucene in this list, but until now, I had no
time to look into the code.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> From: M
20 matches
Mail list logo
