If by changes you also mean deprecated features, then take a look at
LUCENE-1614 - if you have your own Scorers/DISIs, you might want to
implement the new methods, since the current ones are deprecated.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> We're aiming for a Solr release in the
We're aiming for a Solr release in the next few weeks (as usual, we're
6 months behind when we wanted to make the release).
The catch is that Solr depends on Lucene 2.9, and there have been a
*lot* of changes. We're currently on r779312 (upgraded topday).
I'll add a note to Solr to warn users fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713749#action_12713749
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1665:
-
+1. It doesnt work correctly with MultiSearcher
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713748#action_12713748
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. BS2.nextDoc is still needing to check if it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713732#action_12713732
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
{quote}
Regarding the nocommit in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713723#action_12713723
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
Regarding the nocommit in ConjunctionScorer's cto
Remove SortField.AUTO
-
Key: LUCENE-1665
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1665
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Reporter: Michael McCandless
So, here's a real, concrete example of the need for case by case back
compat. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1662
It's completely stupid that ExtendedFieldCache even exists. It is a
dumb workaround for a made up problem that has nothing to do with real
coders living in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-1662.
--
Resolution: Fixed
committed.
> consolidate FieldCache and ExtendedFieldCache instances
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713671#action_12713671
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
;) It's OK.
bq. Regarding Conju
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713668#action_12713668
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. Fixed "Shai Erera vs. Mike McCandless" -> "Sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1614:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1614.patch
Patch is looking good!
OK I attached new patch... no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713645#action_12713645
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
It's ok. I've been staring at this code for so lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713636#action_12713636
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
Well I don't want to have both of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-1664.
--
Resolution: Invalid
This is out of scope for Lucene.
> Apache Lucene crawler search implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713620#action_12713620
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
Did you seriously ask that? :)
Of course !
> Ad
Apache Lucene crawler search implementation
---
Key: LUCENE-1664
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1664
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: gnix infosoft
How
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713624#action_12713624
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1656:
+1 here as well (explicitness rules)
> When sort
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
gnix infosoft updated LUCENE-1664:
--
Remaining Estimate: 5h
Original Estimate: 5h
> Apache Lucene crawler search implementatio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713613#action_12713613
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1656:
-
bq. I'm actually wondering if we should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713608#action_12713608
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
Shai can I make some small tweaks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713606#action_12713606
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1656:
bq. Maybe state in CHANGES that I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713604#action_12713604
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
Much better -- I'll look at the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713600#action_12713600
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1656:
Maybe state in CHANGES that IndexSearcher.setDefa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1614:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1614.patch
Can you try now?
> Add next() and skipTo() variants to DocIdSetIterat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713588#action_12713588
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
I'm seeing some patch hunks faili
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1656:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1656.patch
Attached patch. I plan to commit in a day or two.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1614:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1614.patch
Patch includes the new docID on DISI as well as a bunch of improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller reassigned LUCENE-1653:
---
Assignee: Mark Miller
> Change DateTools to not create a Calendar in every call to dateToStr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1653:
Attachment: LUCENE-1653.patch
add changes.txt
> Change DateTools to not create a Calendar in ever
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713552#action_12713552
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1653:
-
Looks like a good change to me. Only downside I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713543#action_12713543
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. I prefer to defer DISI.start/
You can use Nutch (and Solr), see http://www.lucidimagination.com/blog/2009/03/09/nutch-solr/
for instructions
Please note, that the java-dev list is for discussion by Lucene
developers on the inner workings of Lucene. The java-user list is
better suited for questions of this nature.
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713529#action_12713529
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1614:
I prefer to defer DISI.start/finish until it's ac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713521#action_12713521
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1598:
We are also moving RMI/RemoteSear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1663:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Documentation bug. The 2.4.1 query parser synt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1663:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
> Documentation bug. The 2.4.1 query parser syntax wiki page say
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713499#action_12713499
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1663:
Good catch! I'll fix.
Does anyo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12713493#action_12713493
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1614:
bq. I added testEmptyBucketWithMo
How to implement crawler search in Apache Lucene,
>
> I am currently using FAST search engine in my project, which uses crawler
> facility
>
> How to implement this using Apache Lucene, I read somewhere that there is
> no
> direct functionality to this in Apache Lucene, but we can implement it
> u
40 matches
Mail list logo
