[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1539:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Changed the deletes to be random, cleaned up the code.
Mu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718660#action_12718660
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1685:
-
which reminds me, highlighter has no changes fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1685:
Fix Version/s: 2.9
> Make the Highlighter use SpanScorer by default
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718658#action_12718658
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1685:
-
Didn't even have the actual highlighter code in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718650#action_12718650
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1607:
--
bq. I still have a feeling we should expose a
+1
On 11 Jun 2009, at 21:32, Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718629
#action_12718629 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1685:
-
In Solr land we can quickly hack something together, spend some time
thinking about the external HTTP interface, and immediately make it
available to users (those using nightlies at least). It would be a
huge burden to say to Solr that anything of interest to the Lucene
community should be pulled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718632#action_12718632
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
Given the changes in LUCENE-1407, I don't think w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718629#action_12718629
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1685:
bq. Make the Highlighter use Span
> Yes please post feature requests to Sun ;)
I signed up for
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/nio-discuss
> But I think in the short term Lucene will have to drop to
native code to tell OS not to cache bytes read by segment
merging...
LUCENE-1121 uses transferTo which presumably doe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718626#action_12718626
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1676:
I agree we should decide.
I woul
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> In my opinion, solr and lucene should exchange technology much more. Solr
> should concentrate on the "search server" and lucene should provide the
> technology.
+1
> All additional implementations inside solr like faceting and so
> on, cou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718625#action_12718625
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1407:
bq. If you would implement Remotable in you remot
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Jason
Rutherglen wrote:
> Makes sense.
>
> Currently MMapDirectory doesn't write using mapped byte buffers,
> would the memory management of the OS behave differently if we
> were writing to the MMapped bytebuffers as opposed to writing to
> an RAF (like with FSDir)
Make the Highlighter use SpanScorer by default
--
Key: LUCENE-1685
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1685
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Mark M
Maybe we can put together our requested IO operations and submit them for
inclusion in NIO Java 7? http://openjdk.java.net/projects/nio/
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Makes sense.
>
> Currently MMapDirectory doesn't write using mapped b
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>> Really goes into Solr land... my pref for Lucene is to remain a core
>>> expert-level full-text search library and keep out things that are
>>> easy to do in an application or at another level.
>>
>> I think this must be the crux of our disa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1607?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-1607:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1607.patch
Latest patch attached with multi-threaded test.
Some quick perfor
Makes sense.
Currently MMapDirectory doesn't write using mapped byte buffers,
would the memory management of the OS behave differently if we
were writing to the MMapped bytebuffers as opposed to writing to
an RAF (like with FSDir)?
> it's blind LRU approach is often a poor policy (eg for terms
di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718584#action_12718584
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1676:
-
I think we should decide on one way or another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718581#action_12718581
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1676:
Yeah we have not been consistent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1674:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
Moving out.
> Add IndexReaderF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718579#action_12718579
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1466:
I'd like to get this in for 2.9.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1466:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> CharFilter - normalize characters before tokeni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718578#action_12718578
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
Right, I think deleteDocsByPercen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718575#action_12718575
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1539:
--
It would be good to get done, we need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718573#action_12718573
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
Perhaps "hacky" was too strong a word. I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718561#action_12718561
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1407:
Woops, sorry... "ant test-tag" ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718559#action_12718559
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1407:
-
What do you mean by:
If you can work ou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718550#action_12718550
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1407:
bq. the ant target "test-tag" wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718539#action_12718539
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-1466:
If I can vote for it, I want it to be par
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1407:
Attachment: LUCENE-1407.patch
Moved
- org.apache.lucene.search.RemoteSearchable.java
- org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1345:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
Since I don't think I'll get to providing a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718485#action_12718485
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1684:
-
+1
This approach addresses all of my c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1496.
Resolution: Won't Fix
OK, I'm resolving as "won't fix". It sounds like Lucene onl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718481#action_12718481
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1407:
-
Shai, you miss one little tricky thing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718476#action_12718476
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1496:
---
I think we can close this now. I originally
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-979.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I just removed them.
> Remove Deprecated Benchmarking Utilities fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1496?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718473#action_12718473
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1496:
Uwe, with trie now handling 32 bi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718472#action_12718472
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1407:
>From UnicastRemoteObject's documentation:
{quot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718466#action_12718466
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1407:
I did the following: removed the "extends Remote"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718463#action_12718463
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-979:
Yes.
> Remove Deprecated Benchmarking Uti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718452#action_12718452
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-979:
---
Oh ok, you mean o.a.l.benchmark.Benchmarker, Abstrac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718450#action_12718450
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-979:
bq. What are the "old benchmark" utilities
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>
> > Really goes into Solr land... my pref for Lucene is to remain a core
> > expert-level full-text search library and keep out things that are
> > easy to do in an application or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718447#action_12718447
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1676:
-
bq. Shouldn't the CHANGES entry in this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718443#action_12718443
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1676:
-
That has been minorly inconsistent in the past.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718442#action_12718442
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-979:
---
What are the "old benchmark" utilities?
> Remove De
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718440#action_12718440
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
Jason this patch seems close... a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718436#action_12718436
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
Over in LUCENE-1407 I made some comments about de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-979:
-
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Remove Deprecated Benchmarking Utilities from cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1642.
Resolution: Fixed
I added the test case & committed. Thanks Yasuhiro!
> IndexWri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718433#action_12718433
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1676:
Shouldn't the CHANGES entry in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1592.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 783747
> fix or deprecate TermsEnum.skipTo
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1536:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
Moving out.
> if a filter can
Hi
I apologize in advance that this email is not directly related to Lucene,
but I was wondering if someone else ran into the weird behavior I'm
experiencing.
I noticed that for just the issues I create, I get two emails for every
comment/update, regardless of who does it (me or someone else). Th
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Yonik Seeley
> wrote:
>
>> Really goes into Solr land... my pref for Lucene is to remain a core
>> expert-level full-text search library and keep out things that are
>> easy to do in an application or at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718428#action_12718428
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1407:
bq. Shai, I have looked at LUCENE-1630 but haven'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1644:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
I agree... moving out.
> Enabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718419#action_12718419
]
Billow Gao commented on LUCENE-1599:
Just uploaded the testcase TestSpanRegexBug.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Billow Gao updated LUCENE-1599:
---
Attachment: TestSpanRegexBug.java
Sorry, I should write the test case earlier.
Forgot to check my em
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1684:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1684.patch
> Add matchVersion to StandardAnalyzer
> -
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> The computer should handle that
>> for me. It really should be as easy
>> as saying, look I want the best new defaults, or I want the back compat
>> defaults. The computer should figure
>>
Add matchVersion to StandardAnalyzer
Key: LUCENE-1684
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1684
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Analysis
Repor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718403#action_12718403
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1407:
-
Shai, I have looked at LUCENE-1630 but
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Really goes into Solr land... my pref for Lucene is to remain a core
> expert-level full-text search library and keep out things that are
> easy to do in an application or at another level.
I think this must be the crux of our disagreement.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718398#action_12718398
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1407:
Hmm ... maybe that won't be that simple. As part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1599?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718396#action_12718396
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1599:
-
Hey Billow, do you have anything to add to help
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-772:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
3.1
> Index corruption can cause infinite spin loop
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-996:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
> Parsing mixed inclusive/exclusive range querie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1482:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
> Replace infoSteram by a logging framework (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1407:
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
2.9
Looks like we flip back for now in either cas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718379#action_12718379
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1407:
In LUCENE-1630 I'm going to do just that, as part
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Jason
Rutherglen wrote:
> I read over the LUCENE-1458 comments again. Interesting. I think
> the most compelling argument is that the various files we're
> normally loading into the heap are, after merging, in the IO
> cache. If we can simply reuse the IO cache rath
This was my first idea, when I read the subject. The solution is
FileSwitchDirectory.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Thu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1545?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1545:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
Mark, when we push, we should p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1167:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
I agree; moving out.
> add com
Could we use FileSwitchDirectory to achieve that?
Mike
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Jason
Rutherglen wrote:
> On the topic of MMaping files. Would a Directory implementation
> that transparently MMaps only certain files be interesting? It
> could MMap files that are accessed frequently (term
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718363#action_12718363
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1407:
I'd also like to see this in 2.9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1592:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
OK moving back to 2.9 & assignin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718360#action_12718360
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1407:
-
This bugs me for a while already. Just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718357#action_12718357
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1592:
---
I will do this and close this issue, it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1460:
Attachment: LUCENE-1460_contrib_partial.txt
LUCENE-1460_core.txt
split patch: core
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718342#action_12718342
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1460:
-
Robert, would you divide your patch int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1482?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718327#action_12718327
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1482:
I'm not even sure if this issue should be kept ar
85 matches
Mail list logo
