[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732297#action_12732297
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1749 at 7/16/09 6:35 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732297#action_12732297
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1749:
-
We prob would want to provide an alternate toSt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1749:
Attachment: LUCENE-1749.patch
Here is a start towards guessing the fieldcache ram usage.
It proba
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1750:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1750.patch
Unit test illustrating the issue.
> LogByteSizeMergePolic
LogByteSizeMergePolicy doesn't keep segments under maxMergeMB
-
Key: LUCENE-1750
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1750
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732190#action_12732190
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
bq. :TODO: is the "int" sort type still needed? ... d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732166#action_12732166
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1749:
---
Looks good as a start, one question about a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732157#action_12732157
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1749:
+1 -- this'd be great to get into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1742:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1742.patch
* Reader pool isn't public anymore
* Left methods of read
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732123#action_12732123
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1749:
-
nice - would be great if it could estimate ram
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1749:
-
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Technically this isn't a bug,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1749:
-
Attachment: fieldcache-introspection.patch
Here's the start of a patch to provide this functionality --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732110#action_12732110
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
The motivation for this issue is all of the changes
FieldCache introspection API
Key: LUCENE-1749
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Reporter: Hoss Man
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1728:
Attachment: LUCENE-1728.txt
same patch, but this time i clicked ASF license... sorry!
> Move Smar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1728:
Attachment: LUCENE-1728.txt
Simon, I revised the patch. Here are the new instructions for the
ana
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732060#action_12732060
]
Steven Rowe edited comment on LUCENE-1683 at 7/16/09 11:12 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732060#action_12732060
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1683:
-
bq. ... why is RegexQuery treating the trailing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1566.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Simon!
> Large Lucene index can hit false OOM due to Sun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732051#action_12732051
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1566:
OK thanks Simon; I'll commit shor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732050#action_12732050
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1683:
Do you have a proposed fix for th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732042#action_12732042
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1742:
I don't think we should make Inde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12732000#action_12732000
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1566:
-
bq. Simon can you take a look?
I look
Of course - if you don't plan to push this DISI into "uncontrolled land",
you can use the previous solution as well. I.e., if you never rely on docId
to know whether to start the iteration, and don't pass this DISI to Lucene
somehow etc., there's no need to use act or "adhere completely" to the API
Agreed - that looks like the optimal solution.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> OK, that makes sense: So the example of Yonik should be interpreted like
> this (I think this is the optimal solution as it does not use an additional
> i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1505.
Resolution: Fixed
> Change contrib/spatial to use trie's NumericUtils, and remove
OK, that makes sense: So the example of Yonik should be interpreted like
this (I think this is the optimal solution as it does not use an additional
if-clause to check if the iteration has already started):
class SliceDocIdSetIterator extends DocIdSetIterator {
private int doc=-1,act,last;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731993#action_12731993
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1505:
bq. For completeness, shoudl we a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1566:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1566.patch
OK I reworked the patch some, tweaking javadocs, chang
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731979#action_12731979
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
Okay, so it says: Implementing classes that wan
Uwe / Yonik, DISI's class javadoc states this:
"Implementations of this class are expected to consider {...@link
Integer#MAX_VALUE} as an invalid value."
Therefore "last" cannot be set to MAX_VAL in the above example, if it wants
to be a DISI at least.
Phew ... that was a long issue. I was able
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731984#action_12731984
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
bq. the whole getPayloadSpans deal is a herecy.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731972#action_12731972
]
Earwin Burrfoot edited comment on LUCENE-1748 at 7/16/09 7:54 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731971#action_12731971
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
bq. From my perspective at least, backwards com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731972#action_12731972
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
I took a glance at the code, the whole
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731968#action_12731968
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
My response sent to mailing list:
>>bq. Should
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> I believe we debated allowing the DISI to return any docID less than
> its first real docID, not only -1, as you've done here, but I think
> Shai found something wrong with that IIRC... but I can't find this
> discussion. Shai do you rem
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> OK. At least I have seen a speed up during my tests :). I have the logs
> somewhere. Which tests were affected negative, then I can look into the
> before/after logs?
Sorry, not sure - it wasn't the slower tests that tipped me off, but
the "
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731949#action_12731949
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
bq. Favor to ask, when this is ready to com
OK. At least I have seen a speed up during my tests :). I have the logs
somewhere. Which tests were affected negative, then I can look into the
before/after logs?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1693.patch
New patch with some more work. First the phantastic news:
As Ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731947#action_12731947
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I forgot: I also implemented the final next
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:11 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Did you also test, that the speed was going back to normal with the latest
> fix in trunk (without modifying Solr code)?
I didn't - I was already part way through implementing advance() in Solr.
I'm sure the advance() fix in Lucene would have
>>bq. Shouldnt it throw a runtime exception (unsupported operation?) or
something?
>>What is the difference between adding an abstract method and adding a
method that throws exception in regards to jar drop in back compat?
>>In both cases when you drop your new jar in you get an exception, except
i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731940#action_12731940
]
Hugh Cayless edited comment on LUCENE-1748 at 7/16/09 6:43 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731940#action_12731940
]
Hugh Cayless commented on LUCENE-1748:
--
Ah. I figured it would be something like tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731939#action_12731939
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
bq. Shouldnt it throw a runtime excepti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731935#action_12731935
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1748:
-
The reason it has a default impl is so that it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hugh Cayless updated LUCENE-1748:
-
Summary: getPayloadSpans on org.apache.lucene.search.spans.SpanQuery should
be abstract (was: g
getPayloadSpans on org.apache.lucene.search.spans should be abstract
Key: LUCENE-1748
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1748
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Ty
Ack... Clicked on the wrong group. Sorry - I'll move it.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Search-in-non-linguistic-text-tp24515712p24515926.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Hi Jes,
This is a lucene developer mailing list meant (instead of java user
mailing list). Perhaps you should mail this to java user group.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 06:20:57PM +0530, JesL wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Are there any suggestions / best practices for using Lucene for searching
> non-linguist
Hello,
Are there any suggestions / best practices for using Lucene for searching
non-linguistic text? What I mean by non-linguistic is that it's not English
or any other language, but rather product codes. This is presenting some
interesting challenges. Among them are the need for pretty lax wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731896#action_12731896
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1693:
-
Favor to ask, when this is ready to com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731893#action_12731893
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Ok looks good. I think you will go to bed n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731888#action_12731888
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1567:
-
bq. I need an MD5/SHA1 hash
(http://in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731886#action_12731886
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1566:
-
bq. SimpleFSDirectory is missing from t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1566:
Attachment: LUCENE_1566_IndexInput_Changes.patch
added missing SimpleFSDirectory.
> Large
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731880#action_12731880
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1566:
SimpleFSDirectory is missing from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1567:
-
Attachment: lucene_trunk_FlexQueryParser_2009july16_v7.patch
Here are some updates for t
Contrib/Spatial needs code cleanup before release
-
Key: LUCENE-1747
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1747
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1566:
Attachment: LUCENE_1566_IndexInput_Changes.patch
* Set chunkSize to Integer.MAX_VALUE on 6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Attachment: lucene-1693.patch
This is basically your last patch with these changes:
- I remov
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12731859#action_12731859
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
I like the cleanup you did! Good that initi
64 matches
Mail list logo
