[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734433#action_12734433
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1749:
--
Hmmm... somehow i overlooked the fact that even after
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1749:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1749.patch
minor checkpoint: improved assert messages, and massaged TestRemoteSort so
contrib/memory: PatternAnalyzerTest is a very, very, VERY, bad unit test
Key: LUCENE-1756
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1644:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1644.patch
New patch attached w/ above fixes plus some javadoc fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734411#action_12734411
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1644:
bq. I was a little bit confused a
: LUCENE-1749 FieldCache introspection API Unassigned 16/Jul/09
:
: You have time to work on this Hoss?
i'd have more time if there weren't so many darn solr-user questions that
no one else answers.
The meat of the patch (adding an API to inspect the cache) could be
commited as is today --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734398#action_12734398
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
{quote}
I propose doing this using us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1609.
Resolution: Fixed
> Eliminate synchronization contention on initial index reading
OK done.
Mike
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> Yeah this was deprecated in LUCENE-1609; I guess we could keep the
> getter alive? I'll reopen it.
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jason
> Rutherglen wrote:
>> It's a get method but the UnsupportedOperationE
: Is the assistance restricted to people presenting and committers?
nope...
http://www.apache.org/travel/index.html
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
Hi Grant,
I'm locate in the Bay Area, so I don't need hotel or car and I could
drive to Oakland,
but I was not able to get my company to pay for a apachecon conference Pass.
I also wouldn't mind to do a presentation on the new QueryParser (JIRA
1567),
if I'm able to get to ApacheCon.
As you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-1609:
Reopening to un-deprecate getTermInfosIndexDivisor.
> Eliminate synchronization conte
Yeah this was deprecated in LUCENE-1609; I guess we could keep the
getter alive? I'll reopen it.
Mike
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Jason
Rutherglen wrote:
> It's a get method but the UnsupportedOperationException says "Please
> pass termInfosIndexDivisor up-front when opening IndexReader"?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734355#action_12734355
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
{quote}
query: '(john OR jonathon) smith~0.3
It's a get method but the UnsupportedOperationException says "Please
pass termInfosIndexDivisor up-front when opening IndexReader"? I did
pass it in. Writing a test case for Solr that checks it.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734349#action_12734349
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
{quote}for test checkMatches("\"(jo* -john) s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734337#action_12734337
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
bq. I think it's not a big deal, but I'm just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734333#action_12734333
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1486:
Sorry for all the emails,
I'm still new to JIRA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734323#action_12734323
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1486 at 7/22/09 2:24 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734323#action_12734323
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1486 at 7/22/09 2:22 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734323#action_12734323
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1486 at 7/22/09 2:21 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734323#action_12734323
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1486 at 7/22/09 2:19 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734323#action_12734323
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1486 at 7/22/09 2:13 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734323#action_12734323
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1486:
Mark H -
Question 1)
I also have a question ab
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734301#action_12734301
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1644 at 7/22/09 1:50 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734301#action_12734301
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1644 at 7/22/09 1:38 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734301#action_12734301
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1644:
---
Hi Mike,
patch looks good. I was a little
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734300#action_12734300
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1486:
Hi Mark H
I would like to propose 5,
5) Re-engin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reopened LUCENE-1486:
---
Reopening this issues; we haven't made a final decision on how we want to go
forward yet, but i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734296#action_12734296
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1486:
---
I think the best thing to do here is do exa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734292#action_12734292
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1448:
---
Cool, I will take this approach and submit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734291#action_12734291
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
OK, I think we're finally ready to commit h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734289#action_12734289
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
Thanks, Dave... I'll remove that unused all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734280#action_12734280
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1448:
This approach (adding end()) soun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734274#action_12734274
]
Dave Been commented on LUCENE-1693:
---
My first post to the list, it appears i should comm
>Part of the challenge here is what metric is really important.
Sure, depends who you ask :) Lucene is so popular, that you can find almost
every pattern we could come up with.
funny, I had to deal with similar situation. The simplest solution was to set
warm-up with constructed Queries (from
Another point: I originally didn't think the new parser was going to make 2.9.
Now that it looks like it might, we prob don't want to release a class that
extends the deprecated parser. Getting something similiar with the new parser
would be much preferable - even if it's a bit different.
-
Part of the challenge here is what metric is really important.
Eg, as extreme example, imagine a machine that does searching but also
does other things. The search is not heavily used; in fact people
only run searches from 9 to 5. So overnight, the OS notices the
search isn't using the RAM at al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734245#action_12734245
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1754:
OK patch looks good, thanks Shai!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734241#action_12734241
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
Hi Mark H.,
Thanks for the response,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1754:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1754.patch
My fault. After I created it, I manually edited the CHANGES section, w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734202#action_12734202
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1754:
For some reason I can't apply the
this should not be all that difficult to try. I accept it makes sense in some
cases ... but which ones?
Background: all my attempts to fight OS went bed :(
Let us think again what does it mean what Mike gave as an example?
You are explicitly deciding that Lucene should get bigger share of RAM.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1754:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1754.patch
* Added a test case to TestDocIdSet which returns a null DocIdSet and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734194#action_12734194
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1076:
bq. Feel free to take it, too
I don't mind to ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734190#action_12734190
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1076:
bq. Will wait for you to come bac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1076:
--
Assignee: (was: Michael McCandless)
Unassigning myself.
> Allow MergePoli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1644:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1644.patch
Attached patch: fixed some bugs in the last rev, updat
I think it's a neat idea!
But you are in fact fighting the OS so I'm not sure how well this'll
work in practice.
EG the OS will happily swap out pages from your process if it thinks
you're not using them, so it'd easily swap out your cache in favor of
its own IO cache (this is the "swappiness" co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734176#action_12734176
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1720:
--
bq. Hey Mark. Have you made any progress with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734174#action_12734174
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1076:
Oh. Thanks for correcting me. In that case, I tak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734169#action_12734169
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1076:
maxDoc() does reflect the number
imo, it is too low level to do it better than OSs. I agree, cache unloading
effect would be prevented with it, but I am not sure if it brings net-net
benefit, you would get this problem fixed, but probably OS would kill you
anyhow (you took valuable memory from OS) on queries that miss your inte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734168#action_12734168
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1754:
ok then I'll add a test case to the patch which u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734164#action_12734164
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1754:
I think we continue to allow scor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734156#action_12734156
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1720:
Hey Mark. Have you made any progress with that? W
That's an interesting idea.
I always wonder however how much exactly would we gain, vs. the effort spent
to develop, debug and maintain it. Just some thoughts that we should
consider regarding this:
* For very large indices, where we think this will generally be good for, I
believe it's reasonabl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734154#action_12734154
]
Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1754:
---
keeping null should be fine, as long as this is doc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734150#action_12734150
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1486:
-
My first thought is, if we can address some of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734149#action_12734149
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1754:
Any thoughts on that?
If we keep null, then I'll
In discussions of Lucene search performance, the importance of OS caching of
index data is frequently mentioned. The typical recommendation is to keep
plenty of unallocated RAM available (e.g. don't gobble it all up with your
JVM heap) and try to avoid large I/O operations that would purge the OS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734148#action_12734148
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
I'll try and catch up with some of the issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734146#action_12734146
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1076:
Thanks for the education everyone.
Mike - it fee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734015#action_12734015
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1486 at 7/22/09 7:57 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734141#action_12734141
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1486 at 7/22/09 7:55 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luis Alves updated LUCENE-1486:
---
Attachment: junit_complex_phrase_qp_07_22_2009.patch
I added 2 testcases that return doc 3, but do n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734097#action_12734097
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1460:
-
Michael, after 1728 I can take another look at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734096#action_12734096
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1644:
bq. The biggest problem is, that
The Travel Assistance Committee is taking in applications for those
wanting
to attend ApacheCon US 2009 (Oakland) which takes place between the
2nd and
6th November 2009.
The Travel Assistance Committee is looking for people who would like
to be
able to attend ApacheCon US 2009 who may nee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734070#action_12734070
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1644:
---
The biggest problem is, that this caching g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734067#action_12734067
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1644:
---
Sorry that I came back too late to this iss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734063#action_12734063
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1448 at 7/22/09 3:25 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734063#action_12734063
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1448:
---
This is not the only problem with multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Description:
This patch makes the following improvements to AttributeSource and
TokenStream/Fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1693:
--
Description:
This patch makes the following improvements to AttributeSource and
TokenStream/Fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734025#action_12734025
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1448:
---
Hmm another reason why I don't like two Tee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734023#action_12734023
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1448:
---
Hmm one thing I haven't done yet is changin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734024#action_12734024
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1460:
---
Cool! Thanks, Simon.
> Change all contrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12734022#action_12734022
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1448:
---
OK I think I have this basically working wi
79 matches
Mail list logo
