Parallel incremental indexing

2009-08-29 Thread Michael Busch
Hi all, I just added a wiki page for a new feature I'd like to add to Lucene. Please take a look at the link. I will add more details and diagrams to the page, but for now it should give a rough idea about how to implement it: http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ParallelIncrementalIndexing Basic

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1862) duplicate package.html files in queryParser and analsysis.cn packages

2009-08-29 Thread Robert Muir (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749192#action_12749192 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1862: - just stating the obvious, but for the analysis.

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1872. Resolution: Fixed OK thanks Uwe! > Improve javadocs for Numeric* > --

RE: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler
I missed no commit mails the last days. Maybe they were declared as spam by your mail filter software? - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: George Aroush [mailto:geo...@aroush.net] > Sent: Satu

RE: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net

2009-08-29 Thread George Aroush
I have been watching SVN commits for about 2-3 weeks now (since the announcement that the trunk was going to be an RC) during this time, I have not received any email. It was emails from JIRA that hinted me at code checkin's. -- George -Original Message- From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749179#action_12749179 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- I think this is fine now! Thanks. > Improv

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1862) duplicate package.html files in queryParser and analsysis.cn packages

2009-08-29 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1862?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749171#action_12749171 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1862: - Anyone have any thoughts here? Any time I think

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1874) Further updates to the site scoring page

2009-08-29 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
Further updates to the site scoring page Key: LUCENE-1874 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1874 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Miller As

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1873) Update site lucene-sandbox page

2009-08-29 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
Update site lucene-sandbox page --- Key: LUCENE-1873 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1873 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Mark Miller Assignee: Mark Mille

Re: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net

2009-08-29 Thread Mark Miller
George Aroush wrote: >>> while I'm subscribed to SVN's commits mailing list, I'm not getting >>> all those commits! For example, a commit made this past Friday, I >>> never got an email for, while other commits I do. Any idea what >>> maybe going on? >>> >> There has been some flakin

RE: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net (was: RE: Lucene 2.9 RC2 now available for testing)

2009-08-29 Thread George Aroush
> > while I'm subscribed to SVN's commits mailing list, I'm not getting > > all those commits! For example, a commit made this past Friday, I > > never got an email for, while other commits I do. Any idea what > > maybe going on? > > There has been some flakiness with ASF servers, so maybe

Re: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net (was: RE: Lucene 2.9 RC2 now available for testing)

2009-08-29 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Aug 29, 2009, at 10:58 AM, George Aroush wrote: Hi Folks, I have been following the expected release of Lucene.Net 2.9 for some weeks now, and about 2 weeks ago, just before RC1 was released, I grabbed the code off the trunk and started my initial port. Today, I compared what I have

Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net (was: RE: Lucene 2.9 RC2 now available for testing)

2009-08-29 Thread George Aroush
Hi Folks, I have been following the expected release of Lucene.Net 2.9 for some weeks now, and about 2 weeks ago, just before RC1 was released, I grabbed the code off the trunk and started my initial port. Today, I compared what I have with what's in RC2, only 6 Java files changes -- this is g

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749148#action_12749148 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: bq. "Trie" is the whole "prefix t

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1872: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1872.patch State that precSteps is "bits", and trie is the entire

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749132#action_12749132 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1872 at 8/29/09 6:39 AM:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749132#action_12749132 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- One small thing (I found this also in the L

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749127#action_12749127 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- bq. As far as I can tell, I didn't lose any

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1872: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1872.patch New rev. As far as I can tell, I didn't lose any of t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749117#action_12749117 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: bq. Will we mark it as experiment

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749114#action_12749114 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- Maybe you could copy some of your explanati

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749113#action_12749113 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- Will we mark it as experimental or not? In

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1872: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1872.patch Only javadoc fixes, mostly for Numeric* but also some

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749111#action_12749111 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: bq. Thank you at all for looking

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749107#action_12749107 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- Thank you at all for looking after the docu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749106#action_12749106 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: bq. Because of the uninverter.

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749102#action_12749102 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- bq. I'm confused on why it's the "largest"

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749100#action_12749100 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: bq. About the second one: Sorting

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749097#action_12749097 ] Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1872 at 8/29/09 2:40 AM:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Uwe Schindler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749097#action_12749097 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1872: --- This is correct (first part), you can add a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749095#action_12749095 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872: Can someone confirm that this is

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1872) Improve javadocs for Numeric*

2009-08-29 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
Improve javadocs for Numeric* - Key: LUCENE-1872 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Michael McCandless Assignee: