Hello,
I'm coping a question I've asked in the Users lists, but I think it requires
some patching effort, so maybe that list will be more suitable. The question
is as follow.
I'm using Lucene2.4. I'm developing a web application that using Lucene (via
compass) to do the searches.
I'm intending
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1887:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.9
> o.a.l.messages should be moved to core
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1887:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1887-javadocs-all.patch
> o.a.l.messages should be moved to core
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-1887:
---
Assignee: Mark Miller
One small thing:
The javadocs-all still list the messages package in
Well I'm ready - but I'm just going to wait till the morning - lot of
activity early in the morn (EST), so best to do it after that.
- Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1896:
Attachment: queryNormAlternate.patch
This is a tricky change I think, but shoudnt it be more like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1887:
Summary: o.a.l.messages should be moved to core (was: o.a.l.messages
should be moved to it's own
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753401#action_12753401
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1897:
-
this one I think we are going to live with - un
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753400#action_12753400
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1896:
-
I've committed for RC4 - I'll leave open in cas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1894.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Mark Miller
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1887.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
Thanks a million gu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753388#action_12753388
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1896 at 9/9/09 7:36 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753377#action_12753377
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1896 at 9/9/09 7:30 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753390#action_12753390
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
bq. I agree on the consistency front - Robert,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753389#action_12753389
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
I agree on the consistency front - Robert, I'll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1896:
Attachment: LUCENE-1896.patch
Finally, after all that hot air, an attempt at a patch to address th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753387#action_12753387
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
Luis, if we go with your patch, I think we shou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753386#action_12753386
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
bq. I just think it is ugly having to create a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753384#action_12753384
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1887:
I updated the my patch to remove the deprecated f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753383#action_12753383
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1896:
-
The real problem with this, is that while it wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luis Alves updated LUCENE-1887:
---
Attachment: lucene-1877-new-v2.patch
> o.a.l.messages should be moved to it's own contrib
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753381#action_12753381
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1887:
I agree with you on the compatibility, I'll remov
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753377#action_12753377
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1896 at 9/9/09 7:09 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753377#action_12753377
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1896:
-
Okay - think I was a tad off base -
Here is th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753373#action_12753373
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
Luis, yeah, the difference is your patch has th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753371#action_12753371
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1887:
I looked at Robert's patch it is very similar to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753369#action_12753369
]
Robert Muir edited comment on LUCENE-1887 at 9/9/09 6:38 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753369#action_12753369
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
Luis the only real difference from yours is i u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753367#action_12753367
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
Okay - just let me know which to go with
> o.a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753364#action_12753364
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1887:
I created a patch it should apply clean in main.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luis Alves updated LUCENE-1887:
---
Attachment: lucene-1877-new.patch
> o.a.l.messages should be moved to it's own contrib
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1887:
Attachment: LUCENE-1887.patch
first do:
{noformat}
svn move contrib/queryparser/src/java/org/apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753355#action_12753355
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1887:
--
Hi Mark,
{quote}
Can you do it right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1894:
Attachment: LUCENE-1894.patch
I guess I'll fix this one
> Spatial checks for a string in an int,d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753329#action_12753329
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1887:
-
Can you do it right now? So I can do rc4 tonigh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753328#action_12753328
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1887:
--
+1 to make it 1.4 compatible and move
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1905.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Instantiating SimpleFSLockFactory by its String param constructor throws an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753306#action_12753306
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1905:
-
No problem - I'll just push an rc4 tonight so w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753243#action_12753243
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1905:
---
I am so sorry, my fault. NativeFSLockFcator
Oh!
I am sorry, that's my fault :-( Hope we can fix it soon, its only one line.
Just copy this ctor from NativeFSLockFactory.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:mark
Instantiating SimpleFSLockFactory by its String param constructor throws an
IllegalStateException
-
Key: LUCENE-1905
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1905:
Attachment: LUCENE-1905.patch
> Instantiating SimpleFSLockFactory by its String param constructor
Yonik mentioned that RC3 broke Solr.
It looks like we are going to need an RC4.
/**
* Instantiate using the provided directory name (String).
* @param lockDirName where lock files should be created.
*/
public SimpleFSLockFactory(String lockDirName) throws IOException {
lockDir =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753200#action_12753200
]
Chris Harris commented on LUCENE-1370:
--
Any ideas on whether it will ever make sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753190#action_12753190
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1887 at 9/9/09 11:06 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753181#action_12753181
]
Luis Alves edited comment on LUCENE-1887 at 9/9/09 11:04 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Harris updated LUCENE-1370:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1370.patch
Updating the patch to apply successfully against r813015, and hope
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753190#action_12753190
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1887:
{quote}
The window is closing on this one - the c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753181#action_12753181
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1887:
The original idea is to have messages and the new
+1 - I think thats great.
I'm going to build RC3 and put it up after this is resolved in case
anyone wants to bring something up first.
- Mark
Uwe Schindler wrote:
> How about that patch, this was my idea yesterday, but I didn't want to start
> a new changes.txt format addition like this additio
How about that patch, this was my idea yesterday, but I didn't want to start
a new changes.txt format addition like this additional sentence in the
entry?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: y
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Yes, but we discussed yesterday, that the involved persons developing the
> patches should get some credit... This is why I added this change to the
> log.
If it's for the purpose of credit only, CHANGES should state that it's
not an actual b
Yes, but we discussed yesterday, that the involved persons developing the
patches should get some credit... This is why I added this change to the
log.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: ysee
Yeah - Uwe mentioned that - and was going to do no entry for changes -
but I made a fuss about credit and he added it - this is that sticky/not
so sticky situation I've brought up. The guys should get a credit, but
Changes should be release to release -
personally I think they just get a dev credi
LUCENE-1901 wasn't a bug in any previous release, right?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Ah - thats why I was so confused - it said I had a conflict with your
> change, but I couldn't figure out what it was - it appeared there was no
Nevermind - I missread - I removed your changes entry - sorry!
Eclipse told me there was a conflict, but something was screwed up
because it showed the diff as just
my additions, and not that I was removing anything. Sorry about that -
I'll put your Changes back in.
- Mark
Mark Miller wrote:
> A
Ah - thats why I was so confused - it said I had a conflict with your
change, but I couldn't figure out what it was - it appeared there was no
conflict, so I resolved it and went ahead. Didn't possibly occur to me
that you would be doing the same thing.
What is out of whack with it now? I'll take
Why did you remove LUCENE-1901 again? I committed this short time ago.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: markrmil...@apache.org [mailto:markrmil...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753109#action_12753109
]
Bill Bell commented on LUCENE-1781:
---
I added the test cases that both fail.
> Large dis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: TestCartesian.java
In case you cannot figure out the SVN diff.
> Large distances in Spati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: TestCases.diff
New test cases to test Prime and Anti Meridien. Both fail
> Large distanc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1902.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
r812734
> Changes.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1900.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New])
thanks all
> Confu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753048#action_12753048
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1899:
---
I wanted to add just one comment:
For nomal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1899.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Nadav!
> Inefficient growth of OpenBitSet
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753019#action_12753019
]
Nadav Har'El commented on LUCENE-1899:
--
Yes, you're right, 12.5%. Or actually, 11%=0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1899:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1899.patch
Attached trivial patch. I plan to commit soon...
> I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1899:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
> Inefficient growth of OpenBitSet
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752994#action_12752994
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1899:
bq. This formula ensures that at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1899:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Inefficient growth of OpenBitSet
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752964#action_12752964
]
Bill Bell edited comment on LUCENE-1890 at 9/9/09 12:37 AM:
Ur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752964#action_12752964
]
Bill Bell commented on LUCENE-1890:
---
Url for the solr.war: http://ams.kaango.com.s3.amaz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1890:
--
Attachment: lucene-spatial-2.9-dev.jar
localsolr.jar
SOLR WAR
> auto-warming from Apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752961#action_12752961
]
Bill Bell commented on LUCENE-1890:
---
I get several of these errors. I am using SOLR with
74 matches
Mail list logo
