Interesting idea... though one further piece of info in the mix is
that large segments are typically processed first, and tend to fill up
the priority queue. Conversion from one segment to another is only
done as needed... only the bottom slot is converted automatically when
the segment is switche
Hi guys:
Looking at the 2.9 sorting algorithm, and while trying to understand
FieldComparator class, I was wondering about the following optimization: (I
am using StringOrdValComparator as an example)
Currently we have 1 instance of per segment data structure, e.g. (ords,vals
etc.), and we kee
I will send the latest version of the draft to java-user in a few days
if nobody objects.
Michael
On 10/13/09 3:10 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
OK, I made the draft a bit "more neutral" by pointing out the
downsides clearer. However, I think we have to explain reasons for and
against the change,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1963.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed on 2.9.x. Thanks Robert!
> ArabicAnalyzer: Lowercase
Contrib committers do not have karma for branches - just the trunk
contrib area. I assume its just because of how the karma is granted -
not wildcard based eg */contrib/*.
Michael McCandless wrote:
> Ooh, I'll go commit that one (though it's kinda weird that you're not
> able to do so)...
>
> Any
Ooh, I'll go commit that one (though it's kinda weird that you're not
able to do so)...
Any others?
Mike
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> can someone take a look at LUCENE-1963? :)
> (there were no objections to back-porting the fix, but i do not have
> permission to do it
Lets cut a release with this scorer bug fix?
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I can cut the 2.9.1 release, but... should we wait a bit to see
> whether other issues come up? Or do it, now?
>
> If there are any issues you've already fixed on trunk but think should
> al
can someone take a look at LUCENE-1963? :)
(there were no objections to back-porting the fix, but i do not have
permission to do it)
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Michael McCandless <
luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> I can cut the 2.9.1 release, but... should we wait a bit to see
> whether
I can cut the 2.9.1 release, but... should we wait a bit to see
whether other issues come up? Or do it, now?
If there are any issues you've already fixed on trunk but think should
also be included in 2.9.1, please back-port them!
Mike
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1979.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 825288.
Thanks, Uwe!
> Remove remaining deprecations
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765753#action_12765753
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
do it!
> Remove remaining deprecations fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765752#action_12765752
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
Shall I commit it or are you going to, Uwe?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-1983.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Marking as duplicate of LUCENE-686
> IndexInput not closed by MultiLeve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765701#action_12765701
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
+1 all tests pass here, too!
> Remove rema
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765690#action_12765690
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
{quote}
Seems that in the bw branch one mor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765679#action_12765679
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1979 at 10/14/09 11:43 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765683#action_12765683
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
Seems that in the bw branch one more docCou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765679#action_12765679
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
Thanks!
Your patch for TermVectorAccessor i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1979-2-bw.patch
And the fix for the bw-branch.
Running all tests again now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1979:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1979-2.patch
Fixes the bug in TermVectorAccessor.
> Remove remaining depre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gui Forget updated LUCENE-1983:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1983.patch
Easy fix
> IndexInput not closed by MultiLevelSkipListReader
> --
IndexInput not closed by MultiLevelSkipListReader
-
Key: LUCENE-1983
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1983
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765611#action_12765611
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
This one fails in the bw-branch: org.apache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765610#action_12765610
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
I just ran all tests. test-contrib and test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765593#action_12765593
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
My patch has a bug in TestTermVectorAccesso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1963:
Attachment: LUCENE-1963_branch.patch
its been a few days, no one objected to applying this fix to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1976?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1976:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1976.patch
Attached patch. Now, for an NRT reader, isCurrent ret
Mark Miller wrote:
> Timo Nentwig wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Consider "abcd" and fuzzy factor 0.75: changing 1 character equals a
>> levensthein distance of exactly 0.75. So isn't it wrong to abandon
>> term > (1/(1-minSimilarity))
>>
>> ?
>>
>> Wouldn't >= be correct?
>>
>> ---
Timo Nentwig wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Consider "abcd" and fuzzy factor 0.75: changing 1 character equals a
> levensthein distance of exactly 0.75. So isn't it wrong to abandon
> term > (1/(1-minSimilarity))
>
> ?
>
> Wouldn't >= be correct?
>
>
Hi!
Consider "abcd" and fuzzy factor 0.75: changing 1 character equals a
levensthein distance of exactly 0.75. So isn't it wrong to abandon
term > (1/(1-minSimilarity))
?
Wouldn't >= be correct?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1974:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1974.patch
I've modified TestBoolean2 to show the bug (attached p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765544#action_12765544
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974:
As a test, to tease out more corn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765545#action_12765545
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1974:
bq. Though we have spent about a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-1756.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 825112.
> contrib/memory: PatternAnalyzerTest is a very, v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-1966.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 825110.
Thanks Basem!
> Arabic Analyzer: Stopwords list n
I think this is a good thing. Ultimately, we just need to decide, but
getting user feedback is also important.
-Grant
On Oct 13, 2009, at 6:10 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
OK, I made the draft a bit "more neutral" by pointing out the
downsides clearer. However, I think we have to explain reaso
I just tried this (I increased the numDeletedDocs by adding 1 to
the original counts), but it doesn't hit this bug, I believe because
all the deleted docs are created after the real docs.
It does provoke new failures, but they all seem to be false failures
[floating point precision issues], eg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765483#action_12765483
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1979 at 10/14/09 2:29 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1979:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1979-2-bw.patch
LUCENE-1979-2.patch
Here the patch for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765459#action_12765459
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
javac only shows a warning, if you override
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765454#action_12765454
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1979:
---
For now I fixed all those that the compiler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-1979:
---
I think there are some more deprecations (hidden). A search on deprecated finds
some more files
42 matches
Mail list logo
