[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776884#action_12776884
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-2039:
--
This is a new feature already suggest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776879#action_12776879
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1260 at 11/12/09 7:12 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776879#action_12776879
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1260:
---
The 3.0 release will *not* break backwards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776878#action_12776878
]
Johan Kindgren commented on LUCENE-1260:
Haven't really thought about the back-com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776877#action_12776877
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2047:
--
After thumbing a bit through the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776868#action_12776868
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2047:
--
Without syncing on the writer, we run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776865#action_12776865
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2047:
--
I'd like to remove the syncing in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-2047:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2047.patch
I added deleting live for updateDocument.
TestNRTReaderWi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776823#action_12776823
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1526:
--
As far as the implementation of this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776804#action_12776804
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2047:
--
bq. likely hit seeks resolving the te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776781#action_12776781
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1260:
Performance looks good -- I teste
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776740#action_12776740
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2050:
--
Very nice Mike, I'll try this out wit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776739#action_12776739
]
John Wang commented on LUCENE-1526:
---
Correction: We are NOT using BalancedMergePolicy fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776718#action_12776718
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1526:
{quote}
bq. These sound serious -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776703#action_12776703
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1990:
-
bq. hope I am reinventing bycycle
I bel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776691#action_12776691
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2047:
We could very likely hit seeks re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2057.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 835090
Thanks Shai! As this is not a new bug, I added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Johan Kindgren updated LUCENE-1260:
---
Attachment: Lucene-1260-1.patch
Added 'final' modifier to the Similarity field where it was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776674#action_12776674
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2047:
--
{quote}I would think we do want to de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776672#action_12776672
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2057:
---
bq. It's strange ... I'd thought that if I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776668#action_12776668
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-2039:
Hi Yonik,
{quote}
This almost seems more of an i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2057:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> TopDocsCollector should have bounded generic
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776634#action_12776634
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2057:
It's strange ... I'd thought that if I declare PQ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2057:
--
Summary: TopDocsCollector should have bounded generic
(was: TopDocsCollector should not be d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2057:
--
Attachment: scoredoc.patch
The patch is already finished and ready to commit.
> TopDocsCollec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776618#action_12776618
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2057:
---
The generics should in all cases put on top
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776611#action_12776611
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2056:
Hmm not quite a ringing endorseme
TopDocsCollector should not be declared with generic
Key: LUCENE-2057
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Component
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776612#action_12776612
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2057:
Uwe, let me know if you'd like me to work on a pa
Hi Uwe, I can open an issue and fix it if it'll help you handle that huge
pile of issues you seem to be involved recently :)
Shai
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Can you open an issue, I am currently fixing it? This was a lapsus of
> myself to let the generification pat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776589#action_12776589
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1812:
---
I'll prepare a new patch - the reas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776588#action_12776588
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2056:
-
Will be interesting to see what you come up wit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776587#action_12776587
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2056:
--
I have an uncomfortable feeling that it will
Should NIOFSDir use direct ByteBuffers?
---
Key: LUCENE-2056
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2056
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Store
Re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776576#action_12776576
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1574:
--
A likely optimization for this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776568#action_12776568
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-1526:
-
bq. These sound serious - if you can provide an
Can you open an issue, I am currently fixing it? This was a lapsus of myself
to let the generification patch let in that way. Indeed
FieldValueHitQueue.Entry should extend ScoreDoc and then all looks better. I
have to check for 2.9 backwards breaks if I change this.
This is one example why typ
Thanks for the hint, there is indeed something wrong!
I'll check it!
-
UWE SCHINDLER
Webserver/Middleware Development
PANGAEA - Publishing Network for Geoscientific and Environmental Data
MARUM - University of Bremen
Room 2500, Leobener Str., D-28359 Bremen
Tel.: +49 421 218 65595
Fax:
Hi
TopDocsCollector was changed to be TopDocsCollector. However it has
methods which specifically assume the PQ stores ScoreDoc. So I think that if
I extend it and pass in a NotAtAllScoreDoc object, things will break?
I think we shouldn't put on TopDocsCollector at all, but rather change
its cto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776503#action_12776503
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2055:
-
One thing I would like to fix: these packages h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776502#action_12776502
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2039:
--
bq. I think one problem lucene has today, is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776496#action_12776496
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1909:
-
Whats the use case?
If if the default was diff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776497#action_12776497
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1909:
-
Okay - 2v1 I guess - but I think you guys have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776494#action_12776494
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1909:
---
+1, I have the same opinion
> Make IndexRe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776492#action_12776492
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1909:
-
Because it's nice to know what the defa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776491#action_12776491
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2055:
-
+1 - lets lose it.
> Remove duplicate analysis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776490#action_12776490
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1909:
-
umm ... call me crazy, but why are we making th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776489#action_12776489
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1909:
---
Simon: Should I take & commit it?
> Make I
Remove duplicate analysis functionality
---
Key: LUCENE-2055
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2055
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: contrib/analyzers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776479#action_12776479
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1812:
---
Code seems to be Java 1.5, which is good, b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776472#action_12776472
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1812:
-
bq. Default threshold of what?
What was confus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776464#action_12776464
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1526:
--
bq. if you're indexing 300 documents a second
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776450#action_12776450
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on LUCENE-1812:
---
Default threshold of what? When usi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776430#action_12776430
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1257:
---
Committed:
LUCENE-1257_heavy.patch 2009-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1257:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1257_heavy.patch
I removed also the suppresswarnings and generified TermsHa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-1909:
---
Assignee: (was: Grant Ingersoll)
> Make IndexReader.DEFAULT_TERMS_INDEX_DIVISOR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2054.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
The file was no longer used. I also updated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776415#action_12776415
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1526:
{quote}
1) file handle leak - Our
Remove "System Properties" page from release specific docs
--
Key: LUCENE-2054
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2054
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
C
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2038:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Systemrequirements should say 1.5 instead of 1.4
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2038.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 834833
In general, this should be fixed in a version-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776402#action_12776402
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2045:
Thanks Uwe!
> FNFE hit when crea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2045.
---
Resolution: Fixed
To get rid of this issue (marked as fix for 3.0) -- merge this to 2.9 in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776397#action_12776397
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1909:
-
@Grant: can somebody else take this?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776394#action_12776394
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1909:
+1 for 3.0
> Make IndexReader.DE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776382#action_12776382
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1973 at 11/11/09 9:41 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1973.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed MultiValueSource removal in revision: 834812
Now we are finishe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12765093#action_12765093
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1973 at 11/11/09 9:14 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1257:
Attachment: LUCENE-1257_heavy.patch
I replace my previous patch with this much larger patch.
some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1257:
Attachment: (was:
LUCENE-1257_bench_queries_regex_spellecherk_spatial_snowball.patch)
> Port
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1909:
Attachment: LUCENE_1909.patch
patch with Javadoc
> Make IndexReader.DEFAULT_TERMS_INDEX_D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12776359#action_12776359
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1909:
---
I think, we should have this in 3.0, it's n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1909:
Attachment: (was: LUCENE_1909.patch)
> Make IndexReader.DEFAULT_TERMS_INDEX_DIVISOR pu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1909?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-1909:
Attachment: LUCENE_1909.patch
Grant, are you going to change this for 3.0? If not we shoul
74 matches
Mail list logo
